The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,001–3,100 of 4,692
Multiple Representation Transfer from Large Language Models to End-to-End ASR Systems
Udagawa, T., Suzuki, M., Kurata, G., Muraoka, M., & Saon, G. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10448022 · Cited by 5
Multi-Label Classification of CS Papers Using Natural Language Processing Models
Zhang, Z., Das, A. K., Rahgouy, M., Bao, Y., & Baskiyar, S. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla58977.2023.00289 · Cited by 3
Accelerating the Global Aggregation of Local Explanations
Mor, A., Belinkov, Y., & Kimelfeld, B. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29845 · Cited by 3
ShareBERT: Embeddings Are Capable of Learning Hidden Layers
Hu, J. C., Cavicchioli, R., Berardinelli, G., & Capotondi, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29781 · Cited by 3
Research on Personalized Recommendation Algorithms Based on User Profile
Hui, G., Chen, M., LiQing, Z., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2024.0150330 · Cited by 3
Cloudsuggest: Enhancing E-Commerce with Personalized Recommendations
Kumar, A., Mudgal, A., Yadav, A. L., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (IC2PCT) · doi:10.1109/ic2pct60090.2024.10486797 · Cited by 3
Javaheri, A. H., Motamednia, H., & Mahmoudi-Azanveh, A. (2024) · Iranian Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing · doi:10.1109/mvip62238.2024.10491148 · Cited by 4
Inference-Based No-Learning Approach on Pre-Trained BERT Model Retrieval
Pham, H.-L., Mibayashi, R., Yamamoto, T., Kato, M. P., Yamamoto, Y., Shoji, Y., & Ohshima, H. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) · doi:10.1109/bigcomp60711.2024.00044 · Cited by 3
Erlich, A., Jung, D. F., & Long, J. D. (2024) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393241247420 · Cited by 6
de Araújo, M., Almeida, G., & Nunes, J. L. (2022) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09660-6 · Cited by 5
Rahman, A., Mohammadi, E., & Alhoori, H. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100085 · Cited by 3
Identifying Disaster Regions in Images Through Attention Shifting With a Retarget Network
Thanyawet, N., Ratsamee, P., Uranishi, Y., Kobayashi, M., & Takemura, H. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3443130 · Cited by 3
T5-Based Named Entity Recognition for Social Media: A Case Study for Location Extraction
Dahlan, A. F., & Yuangyai, C. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Industry 4.0, Artificial Intelligence, and Communications Technology (IAICT) · doi:10.1109/iaict62357.2024.10617592 · Cited by 5
Anole: Adapting Diverse Compressed Models for Cross-Scene Prediction on Mobile Devices
Li, Y., Zhu, H., Deng, Z., Cheng, Y., Zhang, L., Chang, S., & Guo, M. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs60910.2024.00063 · Cited by 5
Bodenham, M., & Kung, J. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3420232 · Cited by 3
Leveraging Data-Driven Analytics for Mobile App Feature Extraction and Recommendations
Alam, K. A., Ali, R., Kamran, Z., et al. (2024) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW) · doi:10.1145/3691621.3694951 · Cited by 3
Together we can do it! A roadmap to effectively tackle propaganda-related tasks
Rodríguez-García, R., Centeno, R., & Rodrigo, Á. (2024) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-05-2024-0785 · Cited by 2
Enhancing Emotion Detection through ChatGPT-Augmented Text Transformation in Social Media Text
Lee, S. J., Lee, H. T., & Lee, K.-S. (2024) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731460 · Cited by 3
Tseng, L.-H., Chen, Z.-C., Chang, W.-S., et al. (2024) · IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) · doi:10.1109/slt61566.2024.10832290 · Cited by 3
Optimizing LLM Architectures for Real-Time Applications in Full-Stack Development
Kannadasan, T. (2024) · International Conference on Automation, Computing and Renewable Systems (ICACRS) · doi:10.1109/icacrs62842.2024.10841540 · Cited by 3
M-IRRA: A multilingual model for Text-based Person Search
Tran, H.-P., Phan, T.-H., Nguyen, T.-B., Do, T.-N.-D., Nguyen, H.-Q., Tran, T.-H., Duong, T. T., & Le, T. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) · doi:10.1109/apsipaasc63619.2025.10848834 · Cited by 3
NLU: An Adaptive, Small-Footprint, Low-Power Neural Learning Unit for Edge and IoT Applications
Rostami, A., Zeinolabedin, S. M. A., Guo, L., Kelber, F., Bauer, H., Dixius, A., Scholze, S., Berthel, M., Walter, D., Uhlig, J., et al. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/ojcas.2025.3546067 · Cited by 2
Descriptor: Open-Domain Long-Form Context-Aware Question-Answering Dataset (DragonVerseQA)
Lahiri, A. K., & Hu, Q. (2025) · IEEE data descriptions. · doi:10.1109/ieeedata.2025.3562173 · Cited by 3
A novel Data Extraction Framework Using Natural Language Processing (DEFNLP) techniques
Hussain, T., Akram, M. U., & Salam, A. A. (2025) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100149 · Cited by 4
Fine-Tuned Transformer Model for Sentiment Analysis
Liu, S., Shuai, P., Zhang, X., Chen, S., Li, L., & Liu, M. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55393-7_30 · Cited by 3
UPennHLP at WNUT-2020 Task 2 : Transformer models for classification of COVID19 posts on Twitter
Magge, A., Pimpalkhute, V., Rallapalli, D., Siguenza, D., & Gonzalez‐Hernandez, G. (2020) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.wnut-1.52 · Cited by 3
FASTMATCH: Accelerating the Inference of BERT-based Text Matching
Pang, S., Ma, J., Yan, Z., Zhang, Y., & Shen, J. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.568 · Cited by 3
LMML at SemEval-2020 Task 7: Siamese Transformers for Rating Humor in Edited News Headlines
Ballapuram, P. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.134 · Cited by 3
GBe at FinCausal 2020, Task 2: Span-based Causality Extraction for Financial Documents
Becquin, G. (2020) · Cited by 3
Olizarenko, S., & Radchenko, V. (2021) · Advanced Information Systems · doi:10.20998/2522-9052.2021.2.18 · Cited by 5
Detect Profane Language in Streaming Services to Protect Young Audiences
Chen, J., Wei, K., & Hao, X. (2021) · Workshop on e-Commerce and NLP (ECNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.ecnlp-1.15 · Cited by 3
Characterizing News Portrayal of Civil Unrest in Hong Kong, 1998–2020
Scharf, J. A., McCarthy, A. D., & Dore, G. M. D. (2021) · Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.case-1.7 · Cited by 3
Shared Task 1 System Description : Exploring different approaches for multilingual tasks
Kalyan, V., Tan, P., Tan, S., & Andrews, M. (2021) · Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.case-1.12 · Cited by 3
Sáenz, C. A. C., Dias, M., & Becker, K. E. (2021) · Journal of Information and Data Management · doi:10.5753/jidm.2021.1895 · Cited by 3
Abdelaziz, I., Dolby, J., McCusker, J. P., & Srinivas, K. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i4.20363 · Cited by 5
Assessment of Current Threats to Information Security Using Transformer Technology
", F. S. B. E. I. O. H. E., Vasilyev, V. V., Vulfin, A., et al. (2022) · Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti · doi:10.21681/2311-3456-2022-2-27-38 · Cited by 3
Narrative Detection and Feature Analysis in Online Health Communities
Ganti, A., Wilson, S., Ma, Z., Zhao, X., & Ma, R. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.wnu-1.7 · Cited by 3
Dataset Construction and Classification Based on Pre-trained Models for Opinion Holder Detection
Al-Mahmud, A.-M., & Shimada, K. (2022) · IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) · doi:10.1109/iiaiaai55812.2022.00023 · Cited by 3
Tian, K., Zhang, Z., & Chen, H. (2022) · Workshop on Financial Technology and Natural Language Processing (FinNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.finnlp-1.30 · Cited by 3
Teacher and Student Models of Offensive Language in Social Media
Ranasinghe, T., & Zampieri, M. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.241 · Cited by 3
Cross-lingual transfer for low-resource Arabic language understanding
Abboud, K., Golovneva, O., & DiPersio, C. (2022) · Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop (WANLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.wanlp-1.21 · Cited by 4
Towle, B., & Zhou, K. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.364 · Cited by 3
Neural Generation Meets Real People: Building a Social, Informative Open-Domain Dialogue Agent
Chi, E. A., Paranjape, A., See, A., Chiam, C., Chang, T., Kenealy, K., Lim, S. K., Hardy, A., Rastogi, C., Li, H., et al. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.sigdial-1.37 · Cited by 6
Dumitrescu, Ș. D., Avram, A.-M., & Pyysalo, S. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.387 · Cited by 13
EFSG: Evolutionary Fooling Sentences Generator
Giovanni, M. D., & Brambilla, M. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc50631.2021.00037 · Cited by 3
Andersen, J. B., Bertelsen, M. B., Schou, M. H., Ciosici, M. R., & Assent, I. (2020) · Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems (Eval4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.eval4nlp-1.12 · Cited by 3
Chanda, S., & Pal, S. (2020) · FIRE (Working Notes) · Cited by 3
Tackling the Infodemic: Analysis Using Transformer Based Models
Zutshi, A., & Raj, A. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73696-5_10 · Cited by 3
Memory-Assistant Collaborative Language Understanding for Artificial Intelligence of Things
Yan, M., Chen, C., Du, J., Peng, X., Zhou, J. T., & Zeng, Z. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3100397 · Cited by 3
Crowd-Powered Hybrid Classification Services: Calibration is all you need
Sayin, B., Krivosheev, E., Ramírez, J., Casati, F., Александровна, Т. Е., Маланина, В. А., & Yang, J. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) · doi:10.1109/icws53863.2021.00019 · Cited by 3
Matching The Statements: A Simple and Accurate Model for Key Point Analysis
Phan, H., Nguyen, L., Nguyen, L., & Doan, K. (2021) · Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.argmining-1.17 · Cited by 3
ChatCache: A Hierarchical Semantic Redundancy Cache System for Conversational Services at Edge
Xu, L., Iyengar, A., & Shi, W. (2021) · IEEE ... International Conference on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/cloud53861.2021.00022 · Cited by 3
Self-Attention Mechanism of RoBERTa to Improve QAS for e-health Education
Suwarningsih, W., Pratama, R. A., Rahadika, F. Y., & Purnomo, M. H. A. (2021) · International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE) · doi:10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649363 · Cited by 3
Ram, M., Suresh, G. V., & Biyyapu, N. S. (2022) · International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence) · doi:10.1109/confluence52989.2022.9734140 · Cited by 3
SAS: Self-Augmentation Strategy for Language Model Pre-training
Xu, Y., Zhang, J., Ru, H., Ge, L., Yang, C., Yang, C. H., & Wu, Y. N. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21412 · Cited by 6
Mahadevan, S., Benhur, S., Nayak, R., Subramanian, M., Shanmugavadivel, K., Sivanraju, K., & Chakravarthi, B. R. (2022) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.semeval-1.75 · Cited by 3
Reusable Toolkit for Natural Language Processing in an Ambient Intelligence Environment
Saeedi, S., Fong, A. C. M., Gupta, A. K., & Carr, S. (2022) · IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci51031.2022.10022225 · Cited by 3
Efficient Text Analysis with Pre-Trained Neural Network Models
Cui, J., Lu, H., Wang, W., Kang, S., He, L., Li, G., & Yu, D. (2023) · IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) · doi:10.1109/slt54892.2023.10022565 · Cited by 3
Exploring Language-Interfaced Fine-Tuning for COVID-19 Patient Survival Classification
Shorten, C., Cardenas, E., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Hashemi, J., Dalmida, S. G., Newman, D. M., Datta, D., Martinez, L. A., Sareli, C., & Eckard, P. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai56018.2022.00219 · Cited by 3
Argument Mining with Modular BERT and Transfer Learning
Mushtaq, U., & Cabessa, J. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191968 · Cited by 5
Tutoring Helps Students Learn Better: Improving Knowledge Distillation for BERT with Tutor Network
Kim, J., Park, J.-H., Lee, M., Mok, W.-L., Choi, J., & Lee, S. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.498 · Cited by 3
Learning Transferable Spatiotemporal Representations from Natural Script Knowledge
Zeng, Z., Ge, Y., Liu, X., Chen, B., Luo, P., Xia, S., & Ge, Y. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02210 · Cited by 3
Ausklasser - a classifier for German apprenticeship advertisements
Krüger, K. (2023) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2023f8078 · Cited by 3
MIPT, Karpov, D., & Konovalov, V. (2023) · Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies · doi:10.28995/2075-7182-2023-22-200-214 · Cited by 3
Markchom, T., Dhruva, B., Pravin, C., & Liang, H. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.52 · Cited by 3
Yuan, Z., Tyen, G., & Strohmaier, D. (2021) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.74 · Cited by 4
Semi-supervised Thai sentence segmentation using local and distant word representations
Saetia, C. (2020) · Chula Digiverse · doi:10.58837/chula.the.2020.136 · Cited by 3
WaLDORf: Wasteless Language-model Distillation On Reading-comprehensionPreprint
Tian, J. Y., Kreuzer, A. P., Chen, P.-H., & Will, H.-M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.06638 · Cited by 3
Distilling Knowledge from Pre-trained Language Models via Text SmoothingPreprint
Wu, X. C., Liu, Y., Zhou, X., & Yu, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.03848 · Cited by 5
Adding Recurrence to Pretrained Transformers for Improved Efficiency and Context SizePreprint
Yoshida, D., Ettinger, A., & Gimpel, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.07027 · Cited by 5
Semantic Product Search for Matching Structured Product Catalogs in E-CommercePreprint
Choi, J. I., Kallumadi, S. T., Mitra, B., Agichtein, E., & Javed, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.08180 · Cited by 3
HinglishNLP: Fine-tuned Language Models for Hinglish Sentiment DetectionPreprint
Bhange, M., & Kasliwal, N. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.09820 · Cited by 3
A little goes a long way: Improving toxic language classification despite data scarcityPreprint
Juuti, M., Gröndahl, T., Flanagan, A., & Asokan, N. (2020) · Findings · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.12344 · Cited by 30
UniCase -- Rethinking Casing in Language ModelsPreprint
Powalski, R., & Stanisławek, T. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11936 · Cited by 3
EasyTransfer -- A Simple and Scalable Deep Transfer Learning Platform for NLP ApplicationsPreprint
Qiu, M., Li, P., Wang, C., Pan, H., Wang, A., Chen, C., Jia, X., Li, Y., Huang, J., Cai, D., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.09463 · Cited by 3
Meta-KD: A Meta Knowledge Distillation Framework for Language Model Compression across DomainsPreprint
Fang, T., Wang, C., Qiu, M., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Huang, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.01266 · Cited by 3
Primer AI's Systems for Acronym Identification and DisambiguationPreprint
Egan, N., & Bohannon, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08013 · Cited by 3
Pre-trained language models as knowledge bases for Automotive Complaint AnalysisPreprint
Viellieber, V. D., & Aßenmacher, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.02558 · Cited by 5
Benchmarking Intent Detection for Task-Oriented Dialog Systems.Preprint
Qi, H., Pan, L., Sood, A., Shah, A., Kunc, L., & Potdar, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Automatically Matching Bug Reports With Related App ReviewsPreprint
Häring, M., Stanik, C., & Maalej, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.07134 · Cited by 3
YolactEdge: Real-time Instance Segmentation on the EdgePreprint
Liu, H., Soto, R. R., Xiao, F., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.12259 · Cited by 3
Vec2GC -- A Graph Based Clustering Method for Text RepresentationsPreprint
Rao, R. N., & Chakraborty, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.09439 · Cited by 6
Domain-specific Genetic Algorithm for Multi-tenant DNNAccelerator Scheduling.Preprint
Kao, S.-C., & Krishna, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Retraining DistilBERT for a Voice Shopping Assistant by Using Universal DependenciesPreprint
Jayarao, P., & Sharma, A. K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.15737 · Cited by 6
Classifying Long Clinical Documents with Pre-trained TransformersPreprint
Su, X., Miller, T., Ding, X., Afshar, M., & Dligach, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.06752 · Cited by 6
Hematialam, H., & Zadrozny, W. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-500521/v1 · Cited by 4
Accelerating BERT Inference for Sequence Labeling via Early-ExitPreprint
Li, X., Shao, Y., Sun, T., Yan, H. R., Qiu, X., & Huang, X. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.13878 · Cited by 3
Benchmarking Commercial Intent Detection Services with Practice-Driven EvaluationsPreprint
Qi, H., Pan, L., Sood, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.03929 · Cited by 3
Vinod, V., Agrawal, S., Gaurav, V., Pallavi, R., & Choudhary, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.01251 · Cited by 7
Greedy Layer Pruning: Decreasing Inference Time of Transformer ModelsPreprint
Peer, D., Stabinger, S., Engl, S., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. J. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3985429 · Cited by 3
Lin, B. Y., Lee, S., Qiao, X., & Ren, X. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.06937 · Cited by 3
SAS: Self-Augmented Strategy for Language Model Pre-trainingPreprint
Xu, Y., Zhang, J., He, R., Ge, L., Yang, C., Yang, C. H., & Wu, Y. N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
DCoM: A Deep Column Mapper for Semantic Data Type DetectionPreprint
Maji, S., Rout, S. S., & Choudhary, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.12871 · Cited by 3
Can Deep Neural Networks Predict Data Correlations from Column Names?Preprint
Trummer, I. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.04553 · Cited by 3
The state-of-the-art in text-based automatic personality predictionPreprint
Feizi-Derakhshi, A.-R., Feizi‐Derakhshi, M., Ramezani, M., Nikzad-Khasmakhi, N., Asgari-Chenaghlu, M., Akan, T., Ranjbar-Khadivi, M., Zafarani-Moattar, E., & Jahanbakhsh-Nagadeh, Z. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Deep Neural Compression Via Concurrent Pruning and Self-DistillationPreprint
Neill, J. O., Dutta, S., & Assem, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.15014 · Cited by 5
SuperShaper: Task-Agnostic Super Pre-training of BERT Models with Variable Hidden DimensionsPreprint
Ganesan, V., Ramesh, G., & Kumar, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.04711 · Cited by 9
Xu, L., Yang, B., Lv, X., Bi, T., Liu, D., & Zhang, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.01992 · Cited by 6
Li, L., Lin, Y., Chen, D., Ren, S., Li, P., Zhou, J., & Sun, X. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.14682 · Cited by 27
Zero-Shot Open-Book Question AnsweringPreprint
Gholami, S., & Noori, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.11520 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
