CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Quantum chaos in 2D gravity

Open access
Altland, Alexander, Post, Boris, Sonner, Julian, van der Heijden, Jeremy, Verlinde, Erik·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2204.07583arXiv 2204.07583
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We present a quantitative and fully non-perturbative description of the ergodic phase of quantum chaos in the setting of two-dimensional gravity. To this end we describe the doubly non-perturbative completion of semiclassical 2D gravity in terms of its associated universe field theory. The guiding principle of our analysis is a flavor-matrix theory (fMT) description of the ergodic phase of holographic gravity, which exhibits $\mathrm{U}(n|n)$ causal symmetry breaking and restoration. JT gravity and its 2D-gravity cousins alone do not realize an action principle with causal symmetry, however we demonstrate that their {\it universe field theory}, the Kodaira-Spencer (KS) theory of gravity, does. After directly deriving the fMT from brane-antibrane correlators in KS theory, we show that causal symmetry breaking and restoration can be understood geometrically in terms of different (topological) D-brane vacua. We interpret our results in terms of an open-closed string duality between holomorphic Chern-Simons theory and its closed-string equivalent, the KS theory of gravity. Emphasis will be put on relating these geometric principles to the characteristic spectral correlations of the quantum ergodic phase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2204.07583

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The flavor matrix theory resulting from the model with a fixed number of branes can be shown to describe universal chaotic dynamics.

    “The resulting flavor matrix theory can then be shown to describe universal chaotic dynamics (Altland et al. 2022).”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Altland et al. 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, J. High Energy Phys. 11, 014 (2015), doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)014. · DOI · Paper page
  2. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two- dimensional nearly anti-de Sitter space, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 12C104 (2016), doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw124. · DOI · Paper page
  3. P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.1903.11115. · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, Fine structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim quan- tum gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 066 (2019), doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2019)066. · DOI
  5. C. V. Johnson, Nonperturbative Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, Phys. Rev. D 101, 106023 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.106023. · DOI · Paper page
  6. D. Stanford and E. Witten, JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24, 1475 (2020), doi:10.4310/atmp.2020.v24.n6.a4. · DOI · Paper page
  7. C. V. Johnson, Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity, minimal strings, and matrix models, Phys. Rev. D 103, 046012 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.046012. · DOI
  8. K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, JT supergravity and Brezin-Gross-Witten tau-function, J. High Energy Phys. 10, 160 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2020)160. · DOI
  9. E. Witten, Matrix models and deformations of JT gravity, Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 476, 2244 (2020), doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0582. · DOI · Paper page
  10. H. Maxfield and G. J. Turiaci, The path integral of 3D gravity near extremality; or, JT gravity with defects as a matrix integral, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 118 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2021)118. · DOI · Paper page
  11. A. Blommaert and J. Kruthoff, Gravity without averaging, SciPost Phys. 12, 073 (2022), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.2.073. · DOI
  12. J. S. Cotler et al., Black holes and random matrices, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 118 (2017), doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)118. · DOI · Paper page
  13. P. Saad, Late time correlation functions, baby universes, and ETH in JT gravity, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.1910.10311. · DOI · Paper page
  14. J. McNamara and C. Vafa, Baby universes, holography, and the swampland, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.2004.06738. · DOI · Paper page
  15. B. Post, J. van der Heijden and E. Verlinde, A universe field theory for JT gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 118 (2022), doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)118. · DOI · Paper page
  16. T. Anous, J. Kruthoff and R. Mahajan, Density matrices in quantum gravity, SciPost Phys. 9, 045 (2020), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.4.045. · DOI
  17. K. Efetov, Supersymmetry and theory of disordered metals, Adv. Phys. 32, 53 (1983), doi:10.1080/00018738300101531. · DOI
  18. A. Altland and J. Sonner, Late time physics of holographic quantum chaos, SciPost Phys. 11, 034 (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.2.034. · DOI
  19. A. Altland, D. Bagrets, P. Nayak, J. Sonner and M. Vielma, From operator statistics to wormholes, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033259 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033259. · DOI
  20. F. Wegner, The mobility edge problem: Continuous symmetry and a conjecture, Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter Quanta 35, 207 (1979), doi:10.1007/BF01319839. · DOI
  21. J. J. M. Verbaarschot and M. R. Zirnbauer, Critique of the replica trick, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18, 1093 (1985), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/18/7/018. · DOI
  22. K. B. Efetov, Sypersymmetry in disorder and chaos, Cambridge University Press, UK, ISBN 9780521663823 (1996), doi:10.1017/CBO9780511573057. · DOI
  23. M. R. Zirnbauer, Riemannian symmetric superspaces and their origin in random-matrix theory, J. Math. Phys. 37, 4986 (1996), doi:10.1063/1.531675. · DOI
  24. A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142 (1997), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.55.1142. · DOI · Paper page
  25. D. Stanford and E. Witten, Fermionic localization of the schwarzian theory, J. High Energy Phys. 10, 008 (2017), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)008. · DOI · Paper page
  26. B. Eynard and N. Orantin, Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion, Com- mun. Number Theory Phys. 1, 347 (2007), doi:10.4310/CNTP.2007.v1.n2.a4. · DOI
  27. M. Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix airy func- tion, Commun. Math. Phys. 147, 1 (1992), doi:10.1007/BF02099526. · DOI · Paper page
  28. A. V. Andreev and B. L. Altshuler, Spectral statistics beyond random matrix theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 902 (1995), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.902. · DOI
  29. R. Dijkgraaf and C. Vafa, On geometry and matrix models, Nucl. Phys. B 644, 21 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00764-2. · DOI
  30. R. Dijkgraaf and C. Vafa, Matrix models, topological strings, and supersymmetric gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 644, 3 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00766-6. · DOI
  31. M. Aganagic, R. Dijkgraaf, A. Klemm, M. Mariño and C. Vafa, Topological strings and integrable hierarchies, Commun. Math. Phys. 261, 451 (2005), doi:10.1007/s00220-005- 1448-9. · DOI
  32. R. Dijkgraaf and C. Vafa, Two dimensional Kodaira-Spencer theory and three dimensional Chern-Simons gravity, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.0711.1932. · DOI · Paper page
  33. N. Seiberg and D. Shih, Branes, rings and matrix models in minimal (super)string theory, J. High Energy Phys. 02, 021 (2004), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/02/021. · DOI
  34. J. Maldacena, G. Moore, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, Exact vs. semiclassical target space of the minimal string, J. High Energy Phys. 10, 020 (2004), doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2004/10/020. · DOI
  35. A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, Eigenbranes in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 02, 168 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)168. · DOI
  36. A. Goel, L. V. Iliesiu, J. Kruthoff and Z. Yang, Classifying boundary conditions in JT gravity: From energy-branes to α-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 04, 069 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)069. · DOI
  37. C. Vafa, Brane/anti-brane systems and U(N |M ) supergroup, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0101218. · DOI
  38. T. Guhr, Arbitrary unitarily invariant random matrix ensembles and supersymmetry, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39, 13191 (2006), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/42/002. · DOI
  39. M. Kieburg, J. Grönqvist and T. Guhr, Arbitrary rotation invariant random matrix ensem- bles and supersymmetry: Orthogonal and unitary-symplectic case, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 275205 (2009), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/27/275205. · DOI
  40. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3339. · DOI · Paper page
  41. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.106002. · DOI · Paper page
  42. A. Altland and D. Bagrets, Quantum ergodicity in the SYK model, Nucl. Phys. B 930, 45 (2018), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.02.015. · DOI
  43. P. W. Brouwer, C. Mudry, B. D. Simons and A. Altland, Delocalization in coupled one- dimensional chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 862 (1998), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.862. · DOI
  44. M. R. Zirnbauer, The supersymmetry method of random matrix theory, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.math-ph/0404057. · DOI
  45. M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes, Commun. Math. Phys. 165, 311 (1994), doi:10.1007/BF02099774. · DOI
  46. M. Mirzakhani, Simple geodesics and Weil-Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of bordered Riemann surfaces, Invent. math. 167, 179 (2006), doi:10.1007/s00222-006-0013-2. · DOI
  47. M. Mirzakhani, Weil-Petersson volumes and intersection theory on the moduli space of curves, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20, 1 (2006), doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-06-00526-1. · DOI · Paper page
  48. B. Eynard, Topological expansion for the 1-hermitian matrix model correlation functions, J. High Energy Phys. 11, 031 (2004), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/031. · DOI · Paper page
  49. B. Eynard and N. Orantin, Algebraic methods in random matrices and enumerative geom- etry, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.0811.3531. · DOI
  50. B. Eynard and N. Orantin, Weil-Petersson volume of moduli spaces, Mirzakhani's recursion and matrix models, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.0705.3600. · DOI · Paper page
  51. M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Mariño and C. Vafa, The topological vertex, Commun. Math. Phys. 254, 425 (2004), doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1162-z. · DOI
  52. A.-K. Kashani-Poor, The wave function behavior of the open topological string partition function on the conifold, J. High Energy Phys. 04, 004 (2007), doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2007/04/004. · DOI
  53. T. Kimura, M. Panfil, Y. Sugimoto and P. Sułkowski, Branes, quivers and wave-functions, SciPost Phys. 10, 051 (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.2.051. · DOI
  54. B. Eynard and E. Garcia-Failde, From topological recursion to wave functions and PDEs quantizing hyperelliptic curves, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.1911.07795. · DOI
  55. A. Grassi, J. Källén and M. Mariño, The topological open string wavefunction, Commun. Math. Phys. 338, 533 (2015), doi:10.1007/s00220-015-2387-8. · DOI
  56. B. Eynard and N. Orantin, Topological expansion of mixed correlations in the Hermitian 2-matrix model and x-y symmetry of the F g algebraic invariants, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 015203 (2007), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/1/015203. · DOI
  57. B. Eynard and N. Orantin, About the x-y symmetry of the F g algebraic invariants, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.1311.4993. · DOI
  58. K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, JT gravity, KdV equations and macroscopic loop operators, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 156 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)156. · DOI · Paper page
  59. R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, Developments in topological gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1830029 (2018), doi:10.1142/S0217751X18300296. · DOI
  60. R. Pandharipande, J. P. Solomon and R. J. Tessler, Intersection theory on moduli of disks, open KdV and Virasoro, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.1409.2191. · DOI
  61. A. Buryak, Equivalence of the open KdV and the open Virasoro equations for the mod- uli space of Riemann surfaces with boundary, Lett. Math. Phys. 105, 1427 (2015), doi:10.1007/s11005-015-0789-3. · DOI
  62. J. Alfaro, R. Medina and L. F. Urrutia, The Itzykson-Zuber integral for U(m|n), J. Math. Phys. 36, 3085 (1995), doi:10.1063/1.531014. · DOI
  63. T. Guhr and T. Wettig, An Itzykson-Zuber-like integral and diffusion for complex ordinary and supermatrices, J. Math. Phys. 37, 6395 (1996), doi:10.1063/1.531784. · DOI
  64. C. Itzykson and J. -B. Zuber, The planar approximation. II, J. Math. Phys. 21, 411 (1980), doi:10.1063/1.524438. · DOI
  65. D. Gaiotto and L. Rastelli, A paradigm of open/closed duality Liouville D-branes and the Kontsevich model, J. High Energy Phys. 07, 053 (2005), doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2005/07/053. · DOI
  66. K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, FZZT branes in JT gravity and topological gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 191 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)191. · DOI
  67. E. Brézin and A. Zee, Universality of the correlations between eigenvalues of large random matrices, Nucl. Phys. B 402, 613 (1993), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90121-5. · DOI
  68. D. Bagrets, A. Altland and A. Kamenev, Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model as Liouville quantum mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B 911, 191 (2016), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.08.002. · DOI · Paper page
  69. A. Goel and H. Verlinde, Towards a string dual of SYK, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.2103.03187. · DOI
  70. E. Witten, Chern-Simons gauge theory as a string theory, in The Floer memorial volume, Birkhäuser Basel, Switzerland, ISBN 9783764350444 (1995), doi:10.1007/978-3-0348- 9217-9_28. · DOI
  71. M. Aganagic and C. Vafa, Mirror symmetry, D-branes and counting holomorphic discs, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0012041. · DOI
  72. G. Bonelli, L. Bonora and A. Ricco, Conifold geometries, topological strings, and multima- trix models, Phys. Rev. D 72, 086001 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.086001. · DOI
  73. T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD, Prog. Theor. Phys. 113, 843 (2005), doi:10.1143/PTP.113.843. · DOI
  74. M. Mariño, Les Houches lectures on matrix models and topological strings, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0410165. · DOI
  75. R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, On the gauge theory/geometry correspondence, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3, 1415 (1999), doi:10.4310/ATMP.1999.v3.n5.a5. · DOI
  76. H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Knot invariants and topological strings, Nucl. Phys. B 577, 419 (2000), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00118-8. · DOI
  77. C. V. Johnson, The microstate physics of JT Gravity and supergravity, (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.2201.11942. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Altland, A., Post, B., Sonner, J., van der Heijden, J., & Verlinde, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Volume
15
Issue
2
ISSN
2542-4653 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2204.07583
arXiv
2204.07583
OpenAlex
W4224293160
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • SciPost Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Centres of Competence in Research SwissMAP (NCCR51NF40-141869)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FP7/2007–2013, 277101999, TRR 183)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FP7/2007-2013, 51NF40, 182513, 141869, 200020)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FP7 2007-2013)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007 - 2013)
  • European Research Council (834878)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
quantum chaos, two-dimensional gravity, JT gravity, holographic gravity, open-closed string duality, holomorphic Chern-Simons theory, spectral correlation, quantum ergodicity, non-perturbative gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review