The DOI matches its DataCite record; 68 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?
Open accessAbstract
We present the largest and most comprehensive empirical study of pre-trained visual representations (PVRs) or visual 'foundation models' for Embodied AI. First, we curate CortexBench, consisting of 17 different tasks spanning locomotion, navigation, dexterous, and mobile manipulation. Next, we systematically evaluate existing PVRs and find that none are universally dominant. To study the effect of pre-training data size and diversity, we combine over 4,000 hours of egocentric videos from 7 different sources (over 4.3M images) and ImageNet to train different-sized vision transformers using Masked Auto-Encoding (MAE) on slices of this data. Contrary to inferences from prior work, we find that scaling dataset size and diversity does not improve performance universally (but does so on average). Our largest model, named VC-1, outperforms all prior PVRs on average but does not universally dominate either. Next, we show that task- or domain-specific adaptation of VC-1 leads to substantial gains, with VC-1 (adapted) achieving competitive or superior performance than the best known results on all of the benchmarks in CortexBench. Finally, we present real-world hardware experiments, in which VC-1 and VC-1 (adapted) outperform the strongest pre-existing PVR. Overall, this paper presents no new techniques but a rigorous systematic evaluation, a broad set of findings about PVRs (that in some cases, refute those made in narrow domains in prior work), and open-sourced code and models (that required over 10,000 GPU-hours to train) for the benefit of the research community.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“| Octo (Ours) | 70% | 75% | 50% | 60% | 100% | 80% | 72% |”
From Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333 · cited 7×
“We choose the number of epochs per run such that the number of model updates remain constant across all runs and match the number of model updates taken by MAE on the ImageNet dataset.”
MethodInfluentialAn Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 47,472 · cited 12×
“VC-1 is superior to the second-best model ( Ego4D+MN ViT-L, Table 4 row 9), which has an average rank of 3.1.”
MethodInfluentialMomentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation LearningPreprint
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. B. (2019) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.05722 · Cited by 16,250
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293 · cited 7×
“3 However, curiously, the kinds of PVRs that are locally-dominant in CORTEXBENCH differ significantly in the size and type of pre-training datasets: CLIP (Radford et al., 2021) was pretrained on 400M image-text pairs from the web; MVP (Radosavovic et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialA simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05709 · Cited by 10,857 · cited 1×
“These algorithms use contrastive [21, 22], distillation-based [19, 20], or reconstructive [18, 23] objectives for training.”
Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners
He, K., Chen, X., Xie, S., Li, Y., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01553 · Cited by 8,489 · cited 10×
“Since VC-1 was trained with MAE (He et al., 2021), it captures features that are generally useful for reconstructing images.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759 · cited 2×
“In this work, we ask the same question that Fukushima [1, 2] asked nearly 50 years ago – how do we design an artificial visual cortex , the module in a computational system that (together with a policy) enables an agent to convert camera input into actions?”
BackgroundEmerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers
Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jegou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., & Joulin, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00951 · Cited by 5,638 · cited 1×
“End-to-end (E2E) fine-tuning with a task-specific loss function can in-principle capture both of the aforementioned benefits of adaptation, and is widely used in computer vision literature (He et al., 2020; Caron et al., 2021; He et al., 2021; Baevski et al., 2022b).”
MethodChain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263 · cited 1×
“We use a broad definition of adaptation [55], which, in the context of large pre-trained foundation models, can take several forms from simple prompting [56], to selectively updating some or all weights of the backbone [5, 35, 57].”
MethodOn the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 330
Cross-View Action Consistency for Camera-Robust Vision-Language-Action Policies
Huang, B., Wei, B., Wang, X., Cai, Y.-K., & Wang, Z.-K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.06965 · Cited by 3
“Generic robot visual pretraining also improves down-stream manipulation [22, 23, 24, 25].”
SiMDex: Mining Similar Egocentric Videos for Cross-Embodiment Dexterous Manipulation
Lin, N., Ohkawa, T., Chen, S., Wen, R., Li, Z.-H., Huang, L.-Q., Zhu, Z.-M., Bao, Y.-M., Li, Y., Cai, M.-J., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.04196 · Cited by 3
LaST-HD: Learning Latent Physical Reasoning from Scalable Human Data for Robot Manipulation
Liu, J.-M., Wang, Y.-X., Gu, C.-Y., Qian, S.-Y., Mi, X.-J., Chen, H., Chen, J.-W., Wuwu, Q., Li, X.-Q., Han, N.-W., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.23685 · Cited by 3
“Early works mainly used egocentric corpora [47, 48] to learn robot visual representations [17, 49, 50].”
NavOL: Navigation Policy with Online Imitation Learning
Wei, X.-F., Gu, C., & Zhang, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.11762 · Cited by 3
“The field has progressed from traditional discrete mapping and planning (Chaplot et al., 2020; Campos et al., 2021; Labb´e & Michaud, 2018) toward approaches that integrate more expressive visual representations (Khandelwal et al., 2022; Majumdar et al., 2023).”
SpatialBoost: Enhancing Visual Representation through Language-Guided Reasoning
Jeon, B., Kim, D., Jang, H., Kim, I., & Shin, J.-W. (2026) · European Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.22057 · Cited by 3
Xu, H., Li, T.-F., Chen, W.-B., Liu, Y., Zuo, X., Song, Y., & Li, H.-A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.23937 · Cited by 3
“Beyond static images, researchers leverage large-scale video datasets [54], [55] and egocentric collections [56], [57] to train robust representations for robotic perception, exemplified by VIP [58] and VC-1 [59].”
Imitating What Works: Simulation-Filtered Modular Policy Learning from Human Videos
Zhai, A. J., Zeng, K.-H., Lu, J.-S., Farhadi, A., Wang, S.-L., & Ma, W.-C. (2026) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.13197 · Cited by 3
“Inspired by the notion of selective imitation in psychology studies Brody & Stoneman (1981), SILO Lee et al. (2020) proposes a reinforcement learning framework to learn which timesteps of a demonstration should be imitated.”
DynaRend: Learning 3D Dynamics via Masked Future Rendering for Robotic Manipulation
Tian, J.-Y., Wang, L., Zhou, S., Wang, S., Li, J.-Y., & Hua, G. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.24261 · Cited by 3
“One line of research [30, 23, 28, 33] directly adopts 2D vision paradigms such as contrastive learning and masked image modeling.”
InfluentialRethinking the Simulation vs. Rendering Dichotomy: No Free Lunch in Spatial World Modelling
Luo, D., Gao, Q.-Y., & Deng, H.-K. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.20835 · Cited by 3
“Integrating vision foundation models as perceptual modules within robotic learning pipelines has yielded dramatic performance gains—not only in basic manipulation tasks but also in long-horizon planning and generalization [Majumdar et al., 2023].”
HiMaCon: Discovering Hierarchical Manipulation Concepts from Unlabeled Multi-Modal Data
Liu, R.-Z., Zhou, P., Luo, Q., Sun, L., Cen, J., Song, Y., & Yang, Y.-C. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.11321 · Cited by 3
“Recent work integrates multiple modalities, combining vision with language [22, 36, 42, 50, 64], proprioception with vision [47, 62, 66], even richer [6, 53, 69].”
Pezzulo, G., Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2025) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/s44319-025-00549-8 · Cited by 4
“For example, “ arti fi cial visual cortices ” mimic some aspects of biological visual processing where the learned representations can later be used to train robotic controllers (Nair et al, 2022; Majumdar et al, 2023).”
Combining Pre-Trained Models for Enhanced Feature Representation in Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Piccoli, E., Li, M., Carfì, G., Lomonaco, V., & Bacciu, D. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.07197
“…representation from collected data by applying different self-supervised methodologies, which can also be fine-tuned during policy learning (Goel et al., 2018; Anand et al., 2019; Kulkarni et al., 2019; Schwarzer et al., 2021; Xiao et al., 2022; Montalvo et al., 2023; Majumdar et al., 2023).”
Generalization Capability for Imitation Learning
Wang, Y.-X. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.18538 · Cited by 3
“Many works [2, 6, 13] follow this framework.”
The Temporal Trap: Entanglement in Pre-Trained Visual Representations for Visuomotor Policy Learning
Tsagkas, N., Sochopoulos, A., Danier, D., Lu, C. X., & Aodha, O. M. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra57385.2026.11696856 · Cited by 3
“[31], LVD : LVD-142M [27], K : Kinetics [20], E4D : Ego4D [12], E4D+MNI [23].”
Yardi, Y., Biruduganti, S., & Ankile, L. (2025) · International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering Researches (ICECER) · doi:10.1109/icecer65523.2025.11401367 · Cited by 4
Reinforcement Learning from Wild Animal VideosPreprint
Chane-Sane, E., Roux, C., Stasse, O., & Mansard, N. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04273 · Cited by 2
“Leveraging large-scale human video datasets has been explored in robot learning to pretrain policies [77, 78, 79, 80, 8, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85] and augment RL [86, 87, 88].”
Learning Ensembles of Vision-based Safety Control Filters
Tabbara, I., & Sibai, H. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.02029 · Cited by 3
“…are: (1) CLIP (ViT-B/32 model) (Radford et al. (2021)), a model trained using contrastive learning on image-text pairs collected from the internet and (2) VC1 (ViT-B/32 model) (Majumdar et al. (2023)), a transformer-based encoder model pre-trained on data encompassing control and robotics tasks.”
Just Add Force for Contact-Rich Robot PoliciesPreprint
Xie, W., Caldararu, S., & Correll, N. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.13124 · Cited by 3
“Robot foundation models [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] leverage large-scale datasets spanning diverse objects, scenes, and embodiments to produce generalizable, cross-platform robot policies.”
BackgroundReLIC: A Recipe for 64k Steps of In-Context Reinforcement Learning for Embodied AIPreprint
Elawady, A., Chhablani, G., Ramrakhya, R., Yadav, K., Batra, D., Kira, Z., & Szot, A. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.02751 · Cited by 14
“We only update the parameters of the transformer and projection layers while freezing the visual encoder since prior work shows this is an effective strategy for embodied AI (Khandelwal et al., 2022; Majumdar et al., 2023).”
MethodSelf-citationKnowing More, Acting Better: Hierarchical Representation for Embodied Decision-Making
Zhang, C., Ouyang, Z.-Y., Diao, X., Liu, Z.-Y., & Vosoughi, S. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1042 · Cited by 3
RePo: Resilient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning by Regularizing Posterior Predictability
Zhu, C., Simchowitz, M., Gadipudi, S., & Gupta, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.00082 · Cited by 2
“There are a plethora of techniques for pretraining visual representations using unsupervised learning objectives [38, 34, 30, 32, 41, 49, 47, 13].”
BackgroundDecoupling Vision, Language, and Action for Efficient Multi-Task Robot Policies
Sun, X.-T., Liang, C., Zeng, Z.-Y., Wang, Q., Zhang, H.-Y., Sun, Y., Li, Q.-C., & Rakita, D. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.18374 · Cited by 2
“Their components dated from 2019: encoder-only language modeling saw little follow-up after RoBERTa [16], and no pretrained visual representation of the time worked across embodied tasks [17].”
CALIPER: Clean Scenes Cannot Rank Physical Inference in Pretrained Visual Representations
Mehta, A., & Baviskar, R. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.08250 · Cited by 2
“VC-1 [Majumdar et al., 2023], R3M [Nair et al., 2022], V-JEPA 2 [Assran et al., 2025], VideoMAE [Tong et al., 2022], and DINOv2 [Oquab et al., 2024] are compared by downstream control success, which mixes perception, physical inference, and policy optimisation into one number.”
Nguyen, L. X., Raha, A. D., Le, H. Q., Huh, E.-N., Niyato, D., & Hong, C. S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.13236 · Cited by 2
“The VC-1 study [103] systematically evaluates this SSL on CortexBench, a suite of 17 tasks covering locomotion, navigation, dexterous manipulation, and mobile manipulation.”
LeapBot-WA: World-Anchor Action Models via Predictive Latent Alignments
Liu, P., Zheng, N., Zhang, L., Peng, D.-J., Zhang, Y.-N., Kong, F., Feng, M.-Y., Liu, J., Wang, Y.-N., Chen, Q.-F., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.23969 · Cited by 2
“Moving from pixels to latent codes reduces the burden of reconstruction, but compactness alone does not guarantee semantic abstraction or alignment with action-relevant dynamics (Majumdar et al. 2023).”
GeoProp: Grounding Robot State in Vision for Generalist Manipulation
Zhao, G.-Y., Qian, Q.-H., Zhang, G.-J., Li, W.-H., Wang, J.-N., Lu, X.-W., Zhao, D.-L., & Xu, R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.07101 · Cited by 2
“Robotic manipulation has shifted from state-based reinforcement learning [19, 20], which often assumes compact low-dimensional states, to policies learned from high-dimensional visual observations [1, 4, 21, 22].”
Tac2Pix: Image-Space Visuo-Tactile Fusion for Dexterous ManipulationPreprint
Luo, S., Wu, K., Zhou, X., Li, W., Jiao, Z., & Xiao, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.08765 · Cited by 2
“Vision provides dense spatial observations and can leverage powerful pretrained representations for robotic control (Radosavovic et al., 2023; Majumdar et al., 2023).”
Robots Need More than VLA and World ModelsPreprint
Karcini, E., Mehrban, F., Nguyen, Q., Schwager, M., Ajoudani, A., Cadena, C., Peters, J., Hutter, M., & Ammar, H. B. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.06556 · Cited by 5
“…studies masked visual pretraining for robot manipulation, while VC-1 evaluates a range of pretrained visual representations across robotic tasks and argues for large-scale visual pretraining as a reusable perceptual substrate for embodied control [Radosavovic et al., 2023, Majumdar et al., 2023].”
Learning Structural Latent Points for Efficient Visual Representations in Robotic Manipulation
Jiang, Y.-C., Wang, J.-X., He, J.-H., Gan, Z.-S., Li, J.-H., Zhang, Q., Sun, J.-K., Cao, J.-H., Sun, M.-Y., Yue, X.-Y., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra57385.2026.11696212 · Cited by 2
“Additionally, following the evaluation protocol from VC-1 [35] and PCM [36], we report two aggregate metrics: Mean S.R. and Mean Rank.”
LACE: Latent Visual Representation for Cross-Embodiment LearningPreprint
Jang, Y. S., Ranasinghe, K., Mata, C., Zhang, Y., Mendez-Mendez, J., & Ryoo, M. S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.16743 · Cited by 1
“While robotics-specific self-supervised encoders exist [53, 54, 55, 56], their ability to quickly adapt to embodiments unseen during pretraining remains underexplored.”
Chapin, A., Machado, B., Dellandréa, E., & Chen, L.-M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.21416 · Cited by 2
“…setup allows us to test the practical effectiveness of object-centric representations under real-world embodiment constraints and visual noise. b) Pre-trained visual models: Based on recent state-of-the-art evaluations [2], [10], we selected 7 pre-trained visual models that we depict in Table I.”
InfluentialSTORM: Slot-based Task-aware Object-centric Representation for robotic Manipulation
Chapin, A., Dellandréa, E., & Chen, L.-M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20381 · Cited by 2
DIPOLE: Fusing Vision and Geometry for Robust Visuomotor Generalization
Tang, Y.-K., Geng, H.-R., Jia, J.-D., Hu, Y., Zang, S., Yang, J.-F., Abbeel, P., & Malik, J. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.22445 · Cited by 2
“…degrade when the test scene differs from training, and common remedies such as domain randomization [30], broader demonstration coverage [9], and visual pretraining [31, 32] narrow but rarely close this gap, since their effectiveness is bounded by what the observation encoder can represent [33].”
Self-citationMamba-3VL: Taming State Space Model for 3D Vision Language Learning
Wang, Y., Chen, Y.-X., Qi, Z.-A., Liu, L.-J., Jiao, J.-L., Feng, X.-T., Liang, Y., Ying, S., & Zhang, Z.-P. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.00592 · Cited by 2
Huang, J.-L., Yin, Z.-H., Hu, Y.-D., Wang, S., Lin, X., & Gao, Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra57385.2026.11697545 · Cited by 2
“In the second stage, we freeze the control policy and train only a lightweight visual bridge that maps real observations to the policy’s expected input space [10], [11], [12].”
InfluentialCui, W.-B., Zhao, C.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., Li, H.-R., Zhang, Z.-Z., Zhao, D., & Wang, H. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra57385.2026.11697454 · Cited by 2
“With the maturation of the pre-trained visual representation learning paradigm, many studies [4], [17], [18], [19] focus on enhancing visual representations in robotics using pre-training models.”
Slot-Level Robotic Placement via Visual Imitation from Single Human VideoPreprint
Shan, D., Mo, K., Yang, W., Chao, Y.-W., Fouhey, D., Fox, D., & Mousavian, A. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.01959 · Cited by 2
“These approaches include pre-training latent visual representations [14, 38, 44, 57], inferring action trajectories or plans [3, 31, 46, 70, 78], learn-2 ing value or reward functions [9, 37], reconstructing human hand or hand-object interaction [40, 50, 53, 59, 63], parsing interaction goals and…”
Train Robots in a JIF: Joint Inverse and Forward Dynamics with Human and Robot Demonstrations
Khandate, G., Wang, B.-X., Park, S., Ni, W.-Z., Palacious, J., Lampo, K., Wu, P., Ho, R., Chang, E. T., & Ciocarlie, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.12297 · Cited by 2
Pre-Trained Vision Models as Perception Backbones for Safety Filters in Autonomous Driving
Yang, Y., & Sibai, H. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.22585 · Cited by 2
“The models included in our study are ViT [41] (pre-trained with ImageNet-21k dataset), CLIP [32] (pre-trained with image-text pairs collected from the internet), VC-1 [34] (pre-trained with the Embodied AI dataset known as CORTEXBENCH), and ResNet [42] (pre-trained with ImageNet-1k dataset).”
BackgroundMethodPretrained Visual Representations in Reinforcement Learning
Williams, E., & Polydoros, A. (2024) · Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.17238 · Cited by 2
“Visual Cortex Visual cortex (VC) [8] is a ViT based PVR model trained using Masked Auto-Encoding (MAE) on egocentric data, with the aim of being used for embodied intelligence.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialWahidi, M., Rizk, A., & Imad, R. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3589514 · Cited by 1
“As for self-supervised learning, a framework with far richer feedback, its recent reformulation has enabled unprecedented performance on multi-task problems with foundation models in language [39], [110], [111], [112], vision [36], [113], and robotics [114], [115], to name a few.”
Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success
Kim, M. J., Finn, C., & Liang, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.19645 · Cited by 1
“…and vision foundation models to enhance robotic capabilities, utilizing them as pretrained visual representations that accelerate robotic policy learning [29, 32, 30, 19, 31], for object localization in robotics tasks [9, 45], and for high-level planning and reasoning [1, 17, 42, 16, 43, 18, 6].”
FindingDory: A Benchmark to Evaluate Memory in Embodied Agents
Yadav, K., Ali, Y., Gupta, G., Gal, Y., & Kira, Z. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15635 · Cited by 1
“Following the approach from [22], we collect 64 steps of experience and subsequently perform 2 PPO epochs with a mini-batch size of 2 .”
Self-citationSynthesizing Dexterous Robot Demonstrations from Human Videos via Virtual Try-On
Lee, S.-Y., Jang, S., Kim, M., & Shin, J.-W. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2611.05163 · Cited by 1
“Early work learns visual representations from human videos for downstream robot control (Nair et al., 2022; Majumdar et al., 2023), while recent approaches incorporate human videos into robot foundation model training to learn transferable visual and behavioral knowledge (Yang et al., 2025; Luo et…”
Progress-Guided Preference Generation for Aligning Generative Control Policies
Luu, T., Ton, T., Nguyen, D., Nguyen, X., Nguyen, B. G., Nguyen, Q.-T., Duong, V., Sonntag, D., Nguyen, D. M. H., Ngo, V., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.25692 · Cited by 1
“The R3M encoder used in our main experiments performs best, while VC-1 [67] is competitive and the general vision-language SigLIP2 [68] is weaker.”
What Visual Representations Do World Action Models Need?Preprint
Liu, K., Lyu, J., Deng, T., Zheng, Y., Wan, J., Cui, W., Yan, M., Zhou, Y., Li, H., Zhao, D., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.13024 · Cited by 1
“We consider six pretraining emphases: Visual self-supervision: VC-1 (Majumdar et al., 2023) and VideoMAE V2 (Wang et al., 2023) learn visual structure through masked image or video reconstruction.”
InfluentialThe Planning Limits of Latent World ModelsPreprint
Alrasheed, A., Azam, B., & Akhtar, N. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.39235 · Cited by 1
“Other work probes what visual representations encode about manipulation and physics (Majumdar et al., 2023; Burns et al., 2023; Yeom et al., 2026; Garrido et al., 2025; Joseph et al., 2026).”
Unified Visual-Tactile-Action Modeling from Human Demonstrations for Dexterous Manipulation
Li, W.-Q., Zhao, Q.-Y., Hao, J.-W., Zhu, X.-Z., Liu, T.-Y., Zhang, K.-F., Wen, C., & Huang, S.-Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.34182 · Cited by 1
“This experience has been used to learn reusable visual representations and latent plans for downstream robot control [8, 9, 10, 32, 33], while a complementary line transfers human motor behavior through pose reconstruction, action retargeting, portable motion capture, or human–robot co-training…”
MobileVLA-R1 2.0: RL-Enhanced Reasoning for Mobile Robot Control
Huang, T., Huang, Y., Zhang, Z.-Y., Yan, S.-C., & Tang, H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.06251 · Cited by 1
Ego-OSCAR: Egocentric Open source Stereo CAptuRe System
Paul, G., Palanisamy, S., Rathore, S. S., Patnaik, P., Khatana, S., & Anand, A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.08285 · Cited by 1
“Whether egocentric human video transfers to downstream embodied and video-language tasks is a question prior work has already answered at scale [11, 15, 16, 22]; what remains unsolved is how to capture such video, with calibrated geometry and time-aligned inertial data, at a cost that permits…”
Jena, G., Wanaskar, K., Jain, V., Chadha, A., Sharma, V., & Das, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.01851 · Cited by 4
KAM-WM: Kinematic Affordance Maps from Latent World Models for Robot Manipulation
Shao, X.-Y., Zhou, K.-R., Huang, G., Gao, Y.-J., Cao, T.-T., & Li, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.04652 · Cited by 1
“Visual representation learning has provided strong spatial and semantic features for robot learning through language supervision, masked reconstruction, segmentation, and robotics-oriented pre-training on human or embodied video [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].”
Ordinal Neural Collapse as a Representation Prior for Visual Navigation
Son, E., Kim, J.-T., & Seo, S. (2026) · European Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-37356-4_24 · Cited by 1
Contrastive Action-Image Pre-training for Visuomotor Control
Sharma, Y., Niu, D.-T., Pai, A., Wang, Z.-K., Liu, Z.-Y., Shi, B., Saravalle, S., Shao, B.-N., Zheng, R.-J., Wang, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.17256 · Cited by 1
“We compare CAIP against a representative set of vision encoders spanning self-supervised, language-supervised, video, and robotics-pretrained representations: R3M [15], MVP [16], DINOv2 [4], SigLIP [2], SigLIP 2 [17], VideoMAE [21], VC-1 [22], and the native Qwen3.”
Self-citationDiffusion classifier-driven reward for offline preference-based reinforcement learning
Pang, T., Wang, B., Wu, G., & Yin, Y. (2026) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2026.114098 · Cited by 1
Learning 3D Representations for Spatial Intelligence from Unposed Multi-View Images
Zhou, B., Lai, Q., Sun, Z.-R., Shu, X.-B., Yao, Y.-Z., & Wang, W.-G. (2026) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.10573 · Cited by 1
“We include three representative single-task settings: • VC-1 [14]: 14 tasks from four simulators — Adroit (AD) [10], Meta-World (MW) [28], DMControl (DMC) [22], and TriFinger (TF) [25].”
Zhao, B., Wang, Z., Fang, J., Zhou, Z.-F., Xu, Y., Ji, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, W., Gao, C., et al. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817501
ProCal: Probability Calibration for Neighborhood-Guided Source-Free Domain Adaptation
Zheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Chau, L.-P. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.18764 · Cited by 1
Hyperbolic Multiview Pretraining for Robotic ManipulationPreprint
Yang, J., Wei, P., Chen, Y., & Zheng, N. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.04848 · Cited by 1
“Su-pervised methods [25, 28, 39, 48] typically rely on large-scale annotated 2D image or video datasets [6, 17, 18, 27].”
Temporal Slowness in Central Vision Drives Semantic Object Learning
Schaumlöffel, T., Aubret, A., Roig, G., & Triesch, J. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.04462 · Cited by 1
“VC-1 (Majumdar et al., 2023) is trained on egocentric and third-person videos.”
SpaRRTa: A Synthetic Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Intelligence in Visual Foundation Models
Kargin, T. C., Jasinski, W., Pardyl, A., Zielinski, B., & Przewięźlikowski, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.11729 · Cited by 1
“Task-driven suites such as VC-1 [31] and SPA [19] utilize the same encoders in navigation and object-search policies, measuring downstream success and thereby tying representation quality to action.”
DMC3: Dual-Modal Counterfactual Contrastive Construction for Egocentric Video Question Answering
Zou, J.-Y., Chaofan, C. H. E. N., Bao, B.-K., & Xu, C.-S. (2025) · ACM Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3746027.3755085 · Cited by 1
“As Embodied Artificial Intelligence (EAI) [32, 43] becomes more integrated into daily life, the study of egocentric video understanding [40, 49] has grown increasingly prominent.”
Self-citationUnsupervised Skill Discovery Through Skill Regions Differentiation
Xiao, T., Zheng, J.-K., Yang, R.-S., Xu, K., Zhang, Q.-S., Liu, P., Wang, Z., & Bai, C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3613857 · Cited by 1
“A powerful vision encoder can also be pretrained via masked prediction without annotations or labels [14], [15], [16], and the encoder can be used to solve various vision tasks [17], [18].”
Scene-guided Attention Network for Spatial Understanding in 3D Scenes
Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., Lin, C., Yu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2025) · International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3731715.3733426
“Enabling machines to perceive and interact in real-world scenarios through vision and language has been a relentless pursuit in embodied artificial intelligence [4, 17, 26].”
Human versus artificial social cognition and metacognition: the normative difference
Tison, R., & Zawidzki, T. W. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00774-w · Cited by 1
APEX: Empowering LLMs with Physics-Based Task Planning for Real-time Insight
Huang, W., Yan, W.-X., Zhang, Z., & Singh, A. K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.13921 · Cited by 1
“These models introduce video representation learning [33], multi-agent dynamics, and forward/inverse prediction, yet all remain black-box latent estimators without explicit guarantees of physical consistency.”
Human Gaze Boosts Object-Centered Representation Learning
Schaumlöffel, T., Aubret, A., Roig, G., & Triesch, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02966 · Cited by 1
“Among these models, VC-1 is an MAE [34] trained on combinations of egocentric and third-person videos.”
Adapting Pretrained ViTs with Convolution Injector for Visuo-Motor ControlPreprint
Hwang, D., Lee, B., Lee, H., Kim, H., & Choo, J. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.06072
H-InDex: Visual Reinforcement Learning with Hand-Informed Representations for Dexterous Manipulation
Ze, Y., Liu, Y.-Y., Shi, R.-Z., Qin, J., Yuan, Z.-C., Wang, J., & Xu, H. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.01404 · Cited by 1
“To demonstrate the effectiveness of H-InDex, we evaluate diverse recent strong visual representations for motor control, including (i) VC-1 [17] 1 , which trains masked auto-encoders over 5.6M images with over 10,000 GPU-hours and we use the ViT-B [4] model (86M parameters); (ii) MVP [23,31], which…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMonoLift: Learning 3D Manipulation Policies from Monocular RGB via Distillation
Wang, Z., Wang, M., Dai, G., Long, Y., & Wang, J.-D. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/085713-0181 · Cited by 1
“Additionally, vision foundation models have been used to extract semantic and structural representations from static images [31, 32, 33], as demonstrated in MT-R3M [34], which combines R3M embeddings with a Transformer-based policy head.”
EgoScale: Scaling Dexterous Manipulation with Diverse Egocentric Human Data
Zheng, R., Niu, D., Xie, Y., Wang, J., Xu, M., Jiang, Y., Castañeda, F., Hu, F., Tan, Y. L., Fu, L., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.16710
“Human demonstrations have been widely used to scale robot learning, with early works leveraging human videos primarily for representation learning or intent inference [17, 36, 15, 14, 45].”
Solving New Tasks by Adapting Internet Video Knowledge
Luo, C., Zeng, Z., Du, Y., & Sun, C. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.15369
Robot-DIFT: Correspondence-Sensitive Diffusion Features for Contact-Rich Robot ManipulationPreprint
Deng, Y., Jin, Y., Jia, X., Xue, J., Neumann, G., & Chalvatzaki, G. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.11934 · Cited by 2
“These objectives provide strong semantic priors, but can also encourage invariance to small object offsets, local boundaries, and pre-contact alignments that precision manipulation must react to [6, 7].”
Zhang, X., Becker-Ehmck, P., van der Smagt, P., & Karl, M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.18896
“There are also other people studying the benefit of pretrained visual models for visuomotor tasks (Shah & Kumar, 2021; Majumdar et al., 2023; Hansen et al., 2023b; Parisi et al., 2022) while others try to train large policy networks directly with transformers (Vaswani et al., 2017) and huge…”
All-For-One: Distilling Visual Foundation Models to a Fast, Memory-Efficient Visuomotor Policy
Lee, B., Park, M., Lee, H., Hwang, D., Kim, D., Kim, H., Lee, K., Kim, Y., & Choo, J. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2611.04485
“To leverage vision foundation models (VFMs), one line of work directly adopts off-the-shelf foundation encoders such as DINOv2 [39] or CLIP [42] as frozen perception backbones, or propose robot-centric pretraining [35, 37, 43] and distillation methods [50] from large-scale data [11, 16].”
InfluentialEgoContact: Evaluating Physical Intelligence with Egocentric Video
Deryło, A., Gavryushin, A., Cremers, D., Pollefeys, M., & Wang, X. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.39167
“Earlier work learned reusable visual representations from diverse human video [3], [4], [13].”
SaiVLA-JEPA: Evaluating Future Latent Prediction in JEPA-Conditioned VLA ControlPreprint
Xiao, R., Xiao, R., Chen, W., & Sun, X. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.38508
Braicu, T., DelPreto, J., Boyer, J., Farsang, M., Stölzle, M., Seyde, T., & Rus, D. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.37619
“These applications motivate evaluating what information is accessible in large-scale pretrained visual representations and how adaptation affects their usefulness [14].”
MemVLN: Streaming Episodic Memory for Vision-Language Navigation
Wang, Y., Huang, J., Huang, S.-Y., & Jia, B. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.35066
“Vision-language navigation (VLN) is a fundamental task in embodied AI, requiring an embodied agent to follow language instructions through 3D environments (Anderson et al., 2018b; Krantz et al., 2020; Majumdar et al., 2023).”
Sensorimotor Alignment: A Platonic Proxy for Embodied Policy Success
Xie, Y.-F., Qian, H. H., Lan, S.-Y., Hang, K.-Y., & Wei, C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.31670
“Many robotics studies pretrain visual representations to improve task performance [32, 34, 40].”
Chen, J., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Gao, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Li, Z., Mi, X., Liu, Y., Huang, R., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.31762
“Which pretrained representation to hand a policy is a long-standing question in robot learning [37, 41, 47].”
RangeNav: Task-Aligned LiDAR Range-Image Pretraining for Robot Navigation
Enze, S. F., Patel, M., Yang, F., Kramer, L., Roth, P., Hutter, M., & Cadena, C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.29845
“Several works build upon RGB vision foundation models [11]–[13], keeping encoders frozen or lightly fine-tuned for point-goal navigation [1], [2], image-goal navigation [9], [14], and visual affordance prediction [15]–[17].”
ALPS: Visual State Encoders for World ModelsPreprint
Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, C., Wang, Z., Mei, J., Fei, H., Zhou, Y., & Xie, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.30120
“Comparative studies find no single dominant representation [48], show that general vision datasets can match egocentric video for visuomotor pretraining [19], and note that domain-specific pretraining does not guarantee robustness under visual shifts [11].”
GR-VIP: Geometric representation conditioning for precise visuomotor policy
Lee, C., Seong, J., Choi, E., Lee, H., Lee, J., Bae, J., Kwak, I., Shin, W.-S., & Han, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.22997
Compact Robot Policies Need Fine-Grained Visual RepresentationsPreprint
Chen, N., Yang, R., Tang, J., Liu, S., & Wang, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.08183
“…specifically for manipulation from human video, masked image modeling, or sensorimotor prediction (Nair et al., 2023; Radosavovic et al., 2023; Majumdar et al., 2023), and finds that the benefit of pretrained features varies substantially across tasks and evaluation settings (Burns et al.,…”
Frame-Level Temporal Alignment for Human-to-Robot Visual Adaptation
Zhang, X.-Z., Zhang, J.-F., Zhou, Z.-R., & Jia, H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.04372
“In embodied learning, these two standard encoders represent different pretraining paths (Majumdar et al., 2023; Jing et al., 2023).”
WasserMan: Benchmark for Underwater Manipulation Policy LearningPreprint
Belov, D., Erkhov, A., Parsegov, S., & Osinenko, P. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.04536
ActiveWAM: Evidence-Aware Active Vision for World-Action Models
Wu, R.-J., Ge, L.-Z., & Li, X.-S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.01698
“Pretrained representations [10], [11] and domain randomization [12] support visual transfer, yet history still mixes task evidence with appearance and camera motion.”
Wang, H., Wen, J., Liu, J., Xue, S., Chen, Z., Lin, M., 成, 昌., Guo, X., Zhuo, Y., Chong, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.39973 · Cited by 1
“R3M [25] and VC-1 [26] learn visual representations without action supervision, transferring knowledge through the perceptual encoder.”
Natural State-Prediction Accuracy can Hide Weak Controlled Responsiveness in VLA Readouts
Kim, H., Son, W., Lee, M.-Y., Lee, J.-Y., & Rho, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.34684
“Frozen SigLIP 2, VC-1, R3M, and DINOv3 features exhibit the same type of separation (Tschannen et al., 2025; Majumdar et al., 2023; Nair et al., 2023; Siméoni et al., 2025); the separation is therefore not specific to VLA architectures.”
IronViT: Toward Efficient Generalist Visual Representation Learning
Huang, J.-X., Hu, Y., Zhu, X.-L.-M.-M.-F., Zhang, X.-P., Qiao, H.-T., Zhang, Y.-L., Ji, Z.-F., Li, R.-X., Xu, Y.-F., Yu, H.-Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.29252
“We evaluate frozen visual representations for embodied control on CortexBench [59], using two dexterous-manipulation tasks from Adroit [60] ( pen , relocate ) and five tabletop tasks from Meta-World [61] ( assembly , bin-picking , button-press-topdown , drawer-open , and hammer ).”
Latent Policy Steering: An Efficient and Flexible Framework for Cross-Embodiment TransferPreprint
Wang, Y.-Q., Verghese, M., & Schneider, J. G. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.22521
“Prior works [29][30][31][32] train a visual encoder using both human and robot video data to avoid learning the policy network from scratch.”
LIFD: Anchored Diffusion for 3D-Aware Scene Memory in Robotic Manipulation
Li, W.-B., Chen, Y.-T., Li, W.-H., & Wu, Q.-Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.19796
“Baselines include pretrained 2D features [10], [11], action diffusion [15], VLAs [38], [39], and adapted 3D policies [1]– [3].”
Proprioception-Anchored Cross-Modal Pretraining for Zero-Shot Sim-to-Real Contact-Rich Assembly
Wang, Y.-H., Chen, Y., Jiang, H.-Y., Zhang, G.-J., & Lian, W.-Z. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.07534
“General-purpose visual encoders, including R3M [23], VIP [24], and VC-1 [25], learn reusable representations from large-scale datasets but are not designed specifically for the fine-grained spatial reasoning required in submillimeter assembly.”
Jena, G., Wanaskar, K., Jain, V., Chadha, A. R., Sharma, V., & Das, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.29669
WA-SpecDec: World-Aware Speculative Decoding for Vision-Language-Action Models
Wen, Z., Zhang, Y.-N., & Yuan, D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.08725
“Modern visual backbones provide strong semantic and spatial features (Oquab et al., 2024; Zhai et al., 2023), yet their pretraining objectives are not designed to preserve control-critical variables such as object pose, gripper–object distance, contact phase, and occlusion (Majumdar et al., 2023).”
Fast and Accurate: An Adaptive VLA Inference Framework through Environment-aware Model Selection
Sun, Y.-W., Qin, L., Tian, Z.-C., Li, J., Wang, G.-Q., Huo, S.-Z., Ren, W.-X., Fang, T., Zhang, X.-C., Deng, G., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.06434
“With the growth of robot datasets[5], [6], such pretrained models have been further adapted using large-scale robot data, enabling their semantic priors to transfer to embodied control[17], [18].”
Self-citationMohan, V. B., Naganoor, V., Annadani, Y., & Hegde, S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.05122
“In practice, though, the choice of which layer to start from is either an expensive sweep kept only for its best result, or a fixed truncation depth used by convention, especially in robotics (Nair et al., 2022; Majumdar et al., 2023).”
VLAff: Vision-Language-Affordance Model for Unified Actionable AffordancesPreprint
Oh, J., Kawaharazuka, K., & Okada, K. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.05215 · Cited by 1
“Early approaches focused on learning visual representations through self-supervised learning [17], [16], [15], [23], [24].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Majumdar, A., Yadav, K., Arnaud, S., Ma, Y. J., Chen, C., Silwal, S., Jain, A., Berges, V.-P., Abbeel, P., Malik, J., Batra, D., Lin, Y., Maksymets, O., Rajeswaran, A., & Meier, F.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 655-677
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2303.18240
- OpenAlex
- W7133188016
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 25.21
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- embodied AI, visual cortex, artificial intelligence, visual perception, neuromorphic computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review