PreprintCited by 330Embodied and Extended CognitionPsychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 68 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?

Open access

Abstract

We present the largest and most comprehensive empirical study of pre-trained visual representations (PVRs) or visual 'foundation models' for Embodied AI. First, we curate CortexBench, consisting of 17 different tasks spanning locomotion, navigation, dexterous, and mobile manipulation. Next, we systematically evaluate existing PVRs and find that none are universally dominant. To study the effect of pre-training data size and diversity, we combine over 4,000 hours of egocentric videos from 7 different sources (over 4.3M images) and ImageNet to train different-sized vision transformers using Masked Auto-Encoding (MAE) on slices of this data. Contrary to inferences from prior work, we find that scaling dataset size and diversity does not improve performance universally (but does so on average). Our largest model, named VC-1, outperforms all prior PVRs on average but does not universally dominate either. Next, we show that task- or domain-specific adaptation of VC-1 leads to substantial gains, with VC-1 (adapted) achieving competitive or superior performance than the best known results on all of the benchmarks in CortexBench. Finally, we present real-world hardware experiments, in which VC-1 and VC-1 (adapted) outperform the strongest pre-existing PVR. Overall, this paper presents no new techniques but a rigorous systematic evaluation, a broad set of findings about PVRs (that in some cases, refute those made in narrow domains in prior work), and open-sourced code and models (that required over 10,000 GPU-hours to train) for the benefit of the research community.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2303.18240

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • CoT-VLA: Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Vision-Language-Action Models

    Zhao, Q., Lu, Y., Kim, M. J., Fu, Z., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Li, Z., Ma, Q., Han, S., Finn, C., et al. (2025) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00166 · Cited by 231

    “Some approaches incorporate VLMs [3, 44, 58] into end-to-end trainable policies by using them as pretrained backbone for better visuo-language representation [10, 26, 38, 43, 53].”
  • An Embodied Generalist Agent in 3D WorldPreprint

    Huang, J., Yong, S.-L., Ma, X., Linghu, X., Li, P.-H., Wang, Y., Li, Q., Zhu, S.-C., Jia, B., & Huang, S.-Y. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.12871 · Cited by 475

  • HumanPlus: Humanoid Shadowing and Imitation from HumansPreprint

    Fu, Z.-P., Zhao, Q., Wu, Q., Wetzstein, G., & Finn, C. (2024) · Conference on Robot Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10454 · Cited by 433

    “Human data has been used extensively for robot learning, including for pre-training visual or intermediate representations or tasks [8, 28, 50, 53, 66, 79, 86, 99] leveraging Internet-scale data [18, 26, 27], and for imitation learning on in-domain human data [3, 12, 43, 47”
    Method
  • A Survey on Vision--Language--Action Models for Embodied AI

    Ma, Y., Song, Z., Zhuang, Y., Hao, J., & King, I. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3650584 · Cited by 403

    “Pixel-level information contains rich details—including segmentation masks, object positions, and depth estimation—that are generally more useful for robot manipulation tasks requiring high precision, as demonstrated by VC-1’s comparison [32].”
    Self-citation
  • Video Prediction Policy: A Generalist Robot Policy with Predictive Visual RepresentationsPreprint

    Hu, Y., Guo, Y., Wang, P., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Sreenath, K., Lu, C., & Chen, J. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14803 · Cited by 257

    “No-tably, methods like R3M (Nair et al., 2022), vip (Ma et al., 2022), VC-1 (Majumdar et al., 2023), and Voltron (Karam-cheti et al., 2023) have specifically focused on embodied tasks by innovating pre-training approaches on human manipulation video datasets (Goyal et al., 2017; Grauman et al., 2022).”
    Influential

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Majumdar, A., Yadav, K., Arnaud, S., Ma, Y. J., Chen, C., Silwal, S., Jain, A., Berges, V.-P., Abbeel, P., Malik, J., Batra, D., Lin, Y., Maksymets, O., Rajeswaran, A., & Meier, F.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Pages
655-677
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133188016
Cited by
49
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 2
FWCI
25.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
embodied AI, visual cortex, artificial intelligence, visual perception, neuromorphic computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review