PreprintCited by 99Ethics and Social Impacts of AINatural Language Processing TechniquesLanguage, Communication, and Linguistic Studies

AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances

Open access
Agarwal, Dhruv, Naaman, Mor, Vashistha, Aditya·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are being increasingly integrated into everyday products and services, such as coding tools and writing assistants. As these embedded AI applications are deployed globally, there is a growing concern that the AI models underlying these applications prioritize Western values. This paper investigates what happens when a Western-centric AI model provides writing suggestions to users from a different cultural background. We conducted a cross-cultural controlled experiment with 118 participants from India and the United States who completed culturally grounded writing tasks with and without AI suggestions. Our analysis reveals that AI provided greater efficiency gains for Americans compared to Indians. Moreover, AI suggestions led Indian participants to adopt Western writing styles, altering not just what is written but also how it is written. These findings show that Western-centric AI models homogenize writing toward Western norms, diminishing nuances that differentiate cultural expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2409.11360

Cites

77 of 78 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The concern about generative AI's impacts on cultural expression is particularly urgent in non-Western contexts, where the dominance of Western aesthetics and values in AI development raises fears of cultural erasure and marginalization.

    “This concern is particularly urgent in non-Western contexts, where the dominance of Western aesthetics and values in AI development raises fears of cultural erasure and marginalization [1, 76, 89].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Solon Barocas, Kate Crawford, Aaron Shapiro, and Hanna Wallach. 2017. The problem with bias: From allocative to representational harms in machine learning. In SIGCIS conference paper.
  2. Verena Eitle and Peter Buxmann. 2020. Cultural Differences in Machine Learning Adoption: An International Comparison between Germany and the United States. In Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). AIS, An Online AIS Conference.
  3. G. Hofstede. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institu- tions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publications. https://books.google. com/books?id=w6z18LJ_1VsC
  4. Geert H. Hofstede. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, London and New York. xii, 279 pages.
  5. Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Mukund Srinath, and Shomir Wilson. 2022. A Study of Implicit Bias in Pretrained Language Models against People with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics,
  6. Nicoletta Calzolari, Chu-Ren Huang, Hansaem Kim, James Pustejovsky, Leo Wan- ner, Key-Sun Choi, Pum-Mo Ryu, Hsin-Hsi Chen, Lucia Donatelli, Heng Ji, Sadao Kurohashi, Patrizia Paggio, Nianwen Xue, Seokhwan Kim, Younggyun Hahm, Zhong He, Tony Kyungil Lee, Enrico Santus, Francis Bond, and Seung-Hoon Na (Eds.). International Committee on Computational Linguistics, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, 1324-1332. https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.113
  7. Daijin Yang, Yanpeng Zhou, Zhiyuan Zhang, Toby Jia-Jun Li, and LC Ray. 2022. AI as an Active Writer: Interaction Strategies with Generated Text in Human-AI Collaborative Fiction Writing 56-65. In IUI Workshops. https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248301902

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agarwal, D., Naaman, M., & Vashistha, A.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Cornell Tech (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
1-21
OpenAlex
W4409746764
Cited by
99
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 2
FWCI
99.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1901151, 1901329)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
Keywords
AI-assisted writing, cultural nuance, cultural bias in AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review