Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,149

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6

Open access
Haarsma, Reindert J., Roberts, Malcolm J., Vidale, Pier Luigi, Senior, Catherine A., Bellucci, Alessio, Bao, Qing, Chang, Ping, Corti, Susanna, Fučkar, Neven S., Guemas, Virginie, von Hardenberg, Jost, Hazeleger, Wilco, Kodama, Chihiro, Koenigk, Torben, Leung, L. Ruby, Lu, Jian, Luo, Jing-Jia, Mao, Jiafu, Mizielinski, Matthew S., Mizuta, Ryo, Nobre, Paulo, Satoh, Masaki, Scoccimarro, Enrico, Semmler, Tido, Small, Justin, von Storch, Jin-Song·2016·Geoscientific Model Development
DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract. Robust projections and predictions of climate variability and change, particularly at regional scales, rely on the driving processes being represented with fidelity in model simulations. The role of enhanced horizontal resolution in improved process representation in all components of the climate system is of growing interest, particularly as some recent simulations suggest both the possibility of significant changes in large-scale aspects of circulation as well as improvements in small-scale processes and extremes. However, such high-resolution global simulations at climate timescales, with resolutions of at least 50 km in the atmosphere and 0.25° in the ocean, have been performed at relatively few research centres and generally without overall coordination, primarily due to their computational cost. Assessing the robustness of the response of simulated climate to model resolution requires a large multi-model ensemble using a coordinated set of experiments. The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) is the ideal framework within which to conduct such a study, due to the strong link to models being developed for the CMIP DECK experiments and other model intercomparison projects (MIPs). Increases in high-performance computing (HPC) resources, as well as the revised experimental design for CMIP6, now enable a detailed investigation of the impact of increased resolution up to synoptic weather scales on the simulated mean climate and its variability. The High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) presented in this paper applies, for the first time, a multi-model approach to the systematic investigation of the impact of horizontal resolution. A coordinated set of experiments has been designed to assess both a standard and an enhanced horizontal-resolution simulation in the atmosphere and ocean. The set of HighResMIP experiments is divided into three tiers consisting of atmosphere-only and coupled runs and spanning the period 1950–2050, with the possibility of extending to 2100, together with some additional targeted experiments. This paper describes the experimental set-up of HighResMIP, the analysis plan, the connection with the other CMIP6 endorsed MIPs, as well as the DECK and CMIP6 historical simulations. HighResMIP thereby focuses on one of the CMIP6 broad questions, “what are the origins and consequences of systematic model biases?”, but we also discuss how it addresses the World Climate Research Program (WCRP) grand challenges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 129

  1. Baatsen, M., Haarsma, R. J., Van Delden, A. J., and De Vries, H.: Severe autumn storms in future western Europe with a warmer Atlantic ocean, Clim. Dynam., 45, 949–964, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2329-8, 2015. · doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2329-8
  2. Bacmeister, J. T., Wehner, M. F., Neale, R. B., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C. E., Lauritzen, P. H., Caron, J. M., and Truesdale, J. E.: Exploratory high-resolution climate simulations using the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), J. Climate, 27, 3073–3099, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00387.1, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Barnes, E. A. and Polvani, L.: Response of the midlatitude jets, and of their variability, to increased greenhosuse gases in the CMIP5 models, J. Climate, 26, 7117–7135, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barsugli, J. and Battisti, D. S.: The basic effects of atmosphere-ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability, J. Climate, 55, 477–493, 1998. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bell, R. J., Strachan, J., Vidale, P. L., Hodges, K. I., and Roberts, M.: Response of tropical cyclones to idealized climate change experiments in a global high resolution coupled general circulation model, J. Climate, 26, 7966–7980, 2013. · DOI
  6. Bellucci, A., Gualdi, S., and Navarra, A.: The double-ITCZ syndrome in coupled general circulation models: the role of large-scale vertical circulation regimes, J. Climate, 23, 1127–1145, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3002.1, 2010. · DOI
  7. Bellucci, A., Haarsma, R., Gualdi, S., Athanasiadis, P., Caian, M., Cassou, C., Fernandez, E., Germe, A., Jungclaus, J., Kröger, J., Matei, D., Müller, W., Pohlmann, H., Salas y Melia, D., Sanchez, E., Smith, D., Terray, L., Wyser, K., and Yang, S.: An assessment of a multi-model ensemble of decadal climate predictions, Clim. Dynam., 44, 2787–2806, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2164-y, 2015. · DOI
  8. Bengtsson, L., Hodges, K. I., Esch, M., Keenlyside, N., Kornblueh, L., Luo, J.-J., and Yamagata, T.: How may tropical cyclones change in a warmer climate?, Tellus, 59A, 539–561, 2007. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Birch, C. E., Marsham, J. H., Parker, D. J., and Taylor, C. M.: The scale dependence and structure of convergence fields preceding the initiation of deep convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4769–4776, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060493, 2014. · DOI
  10. Bryan, F. O., Tomas, R., Dennis, J. M., Chelton, D. B., Loeb, N. G., and McClean, J. L.: Frontal scale air-sea interaction in high-resolution coupled climate models, J. Climate, 23, 6277–6291, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3665.1, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cassou, C.: Some critical technical choices for pacemaker experiments, Aspen DCPP Workshop, 7–12 June 2015, Aspen, Colorado, USA, availalbe at: https://www.agci.org/lib/15s1/some-critical-technical-choices-pacemaker-experiments, last access: 9 June 2015.
  12. Chassignet, E. P. and Marshall, D. P.: Gulf stream separation in numerical ocean models, in: Ocean Modeling in an Eddying Regime, edited by: Hecht, M. W. and Hasumi, H., American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C., USA, https://doi.org/10.1029/177GM05, 2008. · doi:10.1029/177gm05
  13. Chelton, D. B. and Xie, S.-P.: Coupled ocean-atmosphere interaction at oceanic mesoscales, Oceanography, 23, 52–69, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2010.05, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Chen, J. M. and Black, T.: Defining leaf-area index for non-flat leaves, Plant Cell Environ., 15, 421–429, 1992. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chuwah, C., van Noije, T., van Vuuren, D. P., Le Sager, P., and Hazeleger, W.: Climate impacts of future aerosol mitigation in an RCP6.0-like scenario, Climatic Change, 134, 1–14, 2016. · DOI
  16. Davini, P., von Hardenberg, J., Corti, S., Christensen, H. M., Juricke, S., Subramanian, A., Watson, P. A. G., Weisheimer, A., and Palmer, T. N.: Climate SPHINX: evaluating the impact of resolution and stochastic physics parameterisations in climate simulations, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2016-115, in review, 2016. · doi:10.5194/gmd-2016-115
  17. Dawson, A., Palmer, T. N., and Corti, S.: Simulating regime structures in weather and climate prediction models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L21805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053284, 2012. · DOI
  18. de Boisséson, E., Balmaseda, M. A., Vitart, F., and Mogensen, K.: Impact of the sea surface temperature forcing on hindcasts of Madden–Julian Oscillation events using the ECMWF model, Ocean Sci., 8, 1071–1084, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-1071-2012, 2012. · DOI
  19. Delworth, T. L., Rosati, A., Anderson, W., Adcroft, A. J., Balaji, V., Benson, R., Dixon, K., Griffies, S. M., Lee, H.-C., Pacanowski, R. C., Vecchi, G. A., Wittenberg, A. T., Zeng, F., and Zhang, R.: Simulated climate and climate change in the GFDL CM2.5 high-resolution coupled climate model, J. Climate, 25, 2755–2781, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00316.1, 2012. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Demory, M.-E., Vidale, P. L., Roberts, M. J., Berrisford, P., Strachan, J., Schiemann, R., and Mizielinski, M.: The role of horizontal resolution in simulating drivers of the global hydrological cycle, Clim. Dynam., 42, 2201–2225, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
  21. DeMott, C. A., Klingaman, N. P., and Woolnough, S. J.: Atmosphere-ocean coupled processes in the Madden–Julian oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 53, 1099–1154, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000478, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Di Luca, A., de Elía, R., and Laprise, R.: Potential for added value in precipitation simulated by high-resolution nested Regional Climate Models and observations, Clim. Dynam., 38, 1229–1247, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1068-3, 2012. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Doi, T., Vecchi, G. A., Rosati, A. J., and Delworth, T. L.: Biases in the Atlantic ITCZ in seasonal–interannual variations for a coarse- and a high-resolution coupled climate model, J. Climate, 25, 5494–5511, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00360.1, 2012. · DOI
  24. Emanuel, K.: Effect of upper-ocean evolution on projected trends in tropical cyclone activity, J. Climate, 28, 8165–8170, 2015. · DOI
  25. Fang, H., Jiang, C., Li, W., Wei, S., Baret, F., Chen, J. M., Garcia-Haro, J., Liang, S., Liu, R., Myneni, R. B., Pinty, B., Xiao, Z., and Zhu, Z.: Characterization and intercomparison of global moderate resolution leaf area index (LAI) products: Analysis of climatologies and theoretical uncertainties, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 529–548, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20051, 2013. · doi:10.1002/jgrg.20051
  26. Frenger, I., Gruber, N., Knutti, R., and Munnich, M.: Imprint of Southern Ocean eddies on winds, clouds and rainfall, Nat. Geosci., 6, 608–612, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., Johnson, N. C., Massonnet, F., and Doblas-Reyes, F. J.: Clusters of interannual sea ice variability in the northern hemisphere, Clim. Dynam., 47, 1527–1543, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2917-2, 2015. · DOI
  28. Gao, Y., Lu, J., Leung, L. R., Yang, Q., Hagos, S., and Qian, Y.: Dynamical and thermodynamical modulations of future changes in landfalling atmospheric rivers over western North America, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7179–7186, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065435, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Gao, Y., Lu, J., and Leung, L. R.: Uncertainties in projecting future changes in atmospheric rivers and their impacts on heavy precipitation over Europe, J. Climate, 29, 6711–6726, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0088.1, 2016. · DOI
  30. Gent, P. R., Yeager, S. G., Neale, R. B., Levis, S., and Bailey, D. A.: Improvements in a half degree atmosphere/land version of the CCSM, Clim. Dynam., 34, 819–833, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0614-8, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Good, S. A., Martin, M. J., and Rayner, N. A.: EN4: Quality controlled ocean temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses with uncertainty estimates, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 6704–6716, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009067, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Grise, K. M. and Polvani, L. M.: Southern hemisphere cloud-dynamics biases in CMIP5 models and their implications for climate project ions, J. Climate, 27, 6074–6092, 2014. · DOI
  33. Haarsma, R. J., Hazeleger, W., Severijns, C., de Vries, H., Sterl, A., Bintanja, R., van Oldenborgh, G. J., and van den Brink, H. W.: More hurricanes to hit Western Europe due to global warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1783–1788, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50360, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Hagedorn, R., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., and Palmer, T. N.: The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting I. Basic concept, Tellus, 57, 219–233, 2005. · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2005.00103.x · Paper page
  35. Hagos, S., Leung, L. R., Yang, Q., Zhao, C., and Lu, J.: Resolution and dynamical core dependence of atmospheric river frequency in global model simulations, J. Climate, 28, 2764–2776, 2015. · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-14-00567.1
  36. Hagos, S., Leung, L. R., Yoon, J.-H., Lu, J., and Gao, Y.: A projection of changes in landfalling atmospheric river frequency and extreme precipitation over western North American from the Large Ensemble CESM simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 1357–1363, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067392, 2016. · DOI
  37. Hashino, T., Satoh, M., Hagihara, Y., Kubota, T., Matsui, T., Nasuno, T., and Okamoto, H.: Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 7273–7292, 2013. · doi:10.1002/jgrd.50564
  38. Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change, Clim. Dynam., 37, 407–418, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6, 2011. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: Time of emergence of climate signals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L01702, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050087, 2012. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Hazeleger, W., van den Hurk, B. J. J. M., Min, E., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Petersen, A. C., Stainforth, D. A., Vasileiadou, E., and Smith, L. A.: Tales of Future Weather, Nature Climate Change, 5, 107–114, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Hertwig, E., von Storch, J.-S., Handorf, D., Dethloff, K., Fast, I., and Krismer, T.: Effect of horizontal resolution on ECHAM6-AMIP performance, Clim. Dynam., 45, 185–211, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2396-x, 2015. · doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2396-x
  42. Hodges, K. I., Lee, R. W., and Bengtsson, L.: A comparison of extratropical cyclones in recent re-analyses ERA-Interim, NASA MERRA, NCEP CFSR, JRA-25, J. Climate, 24, 4888–4906, 2011. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Hoerling, M., Hurrell, J., Kumar, A., Terray, L., Eischeid, J., Pegion, P., Zhang, T., Quan, X.-W., and Xu, T. Y.: On North American Decadal Climate for 2011–2020, J. Climate, 24, 4519–4528, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4137.1, 2011. · doi:10.1175/2011jcli4137.1
  44. Illingworth, A. J., Barker, H. W., Beljaars, A., Ceccaldi, M., Chepfer, H., Cierbaux, N., Cole, J., Delanoë, J., Domenech, C., Donovan, D. P., Fukuda, S., Hirakata, M., Hogan, R. J., Huenerbein, A., Kolias, P., Kubota, T., Nakajima, T. Y., Nishizawa, T., Ohno, Y., Okamoto, H., Oki, R., Sato, K., Satoh, M., Shepherd, M. W., Velazques-Blazquez, A., Wandinger, U., Wehr, T., and van Zadelhoff, G.-J.: The EarthCARE satellite: The next step forward in global measurements of clouds, aerosols, precipitation, and radiation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1311–1332, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Jacob, D., Petersen, J., Eggert, B., Alias, A., Christensen, O. B., Bouwer, L., Braun, A., Colette, A., Déqué, M., Georgievski, G., Georgopoulou, E., Gobiet, A., Menut, L., Nikulin, G., Haensler, A., Hempelmann, N., Jones, C., Keuler, K., Kovats, S., Kröner, N., Kotlarski, S., Kriegsmann, A., Martin, E., Meijgaard, E., Moseley, C., Pfeifer, S., Preuschmann, S., Radermacher, C., Radtke, K., Rechid, D., Rounsevell, M., Samuelsson, P., Somot, S., Soussana, J.-F., Teichmann, C., Valentini, R., Vautard, R., Weber, B., and Yiou, P.: EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research, Reg. Environ. Change, 14, 563–578, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Jung, T., Miller, M. J., Palmer, T. N., Towers, P., Wedi, N., Achuthavarier, D., Adams, J. M., Altshuler, E. L., Cash, B. A., Kinter, J. L., Marx, L., Stan, C., and Hodges, K. I.: High-resolution global climate simulation with the ECMWF model in project Athena: Experimental design, model climate, and seasonal forecast skill, J. Climate, 25, 3155–3172, 2012. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kapnick, S. B. and Delworth, T. L.: Controls of Global Snow under a Changed Climate, J. Climate, 26, 5537–5562, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00528.1, 2013. · DOI
  48. Kidston, J. and Gerber, E. P.: Intermodel variability of the poleward shift of the austral jetstream in the CMIP3 integrations linked to biases in 20th century climatology, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09708, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042873, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Kinter III, J. L., Cash, B., Achuthavarier, D., Adams, J., Altshuler, E., Dirmeyer, P., Doty, B., Huang, B., Jin, E. K., Marx, L., Manganello, J., Stan, C., Wakefield, T., Palmer, T., Hamrud, M., Jung, T., Miller, M., Towers, P., Wedi, N., Satoh, M., Tomita, H., Kodama, C., Nasuno, T., Oouchi, K., Yamada, Y., Taniguchi, H., Andrews, P., Baer, T., Ezell, M., Halloy, C., John, D., Loftis, B., Mohr, R., and Wong, K.: Revolutionizing Climate Modeling with Project Athena: A Multi-Institutional, International Collaboration, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 231–245, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00043.1, 2013. · DOI
  50. Kirtman, B. P., Bitz, C., Bryan, F., Collins, W., Dennis, J., Hearn, N., Kinter III, J. L., Loft, R., Rousset, C., Siqueira, L., Stan, C., Tomas, R., and Vertenstein, M.: Impact of ocean model resolution on CCSM climate simulations, Clim. Dynam., 39, 1303–1328, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1500-3, 2012. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Klutse, N. A. B., Sylla, M. B., Diallo, I., Sarr, A., Dosio, A., Diedhiou, A., Kamga, A., Lamptey, B., Ali, A., Gbobaniyi, E. O., Owusu, K., Lennard, C., Hewitson, B., Nikulin, G., Panitz, H.-J., and Büchner, M.: Daily characteristics of West African summer monsoon precipitation in CORDEX simulations, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 123, 369–386, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1352-3, 2015. · doi:10.1007/s00704-014-1352-3
  52. Koenigk, T., Berg, P., and Döscher, R.: Arctic climate change in an ensemble of regional CORDEX simulations, Polar Res., 34, 24603, https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.24603, 2015. · doi:10.3402/polar.v34.24603
  53. Krichak, S. O., Barkan, J., Breitgand, J. S., Gualdi, S., and Feldstein, S. B.: The role of the export of tropical moisture into mid-latitudes for estreme precipitation events in the Mediterranean region, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 121, 499–515, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1244-6, 2015. · doi:10.1007/s00704-014-1244-6
  54. Kuwano-Yoshida, A., Minobe, S., and Xie, S.-P.: Precipitation response to the Gulf Stream in an Atmospheric GCM, J. Climate, 23, 3676–3698, 2010. · DOI
  55. Lal, M., Cubasch, U., Perlwitz, J. P., and Waszkewitz, J.: Simulation of the Indian monsoon climatology in ECHAM3 climate model: Sensitivity to horizontal resolution, Int. J. Climatol., 17, 847–858, 1997. · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0088(19970630)17:8<847::aid-joc165>3.0.co;2-6
  56. Lavers, D. A. and Villarini, G.: The nexus between atmospheric rivers and extreme precipitation across Europe, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3259–3264, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  57. Leung, L. R. and Qian, Y.: Atmospheric rivers induced heavy precipitation and flooding in the western U.S. simulated by the WRF regional climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L03820, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036445, 2009. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Lu, J., Chen, G., Leung, L. R., Burrows, A., Yang, Q., Sakaguchi, K., and Hagos, S.: Towards the dynamical convergence on the jet stream in aquaplanet AGCMs, J. Climate, 28, 6763–6782, 2015. · DOI
  59. Ma, X., Chang, P., Saravanan, R. Montuoro, R., Hsieh, J.-S., Wu, D., Lin, X., Wu, L., and Jing, Z.: Distant Influence of Kuroshio Eddies on North Pacific Weather Patterns?, Sci. Rep., 5, 17785, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17785, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  60. Ma, X., Jing, Z., Chang, P., Liu, X., Montuoro, R., Small, R. J., Bryan, F. O., Greatbatch, R. J., Brandt, P., Wu, D., Lin, X., and Wu, L.: Western boundary currents regulated by interaction between ocean eddies and the atmosphere, Nature, 535, 533–537, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18640, 2016. · DOI · Paper page
  61. Mahowald, N., Lo, F., Zheng, Y., Harrison, L., Funk, C., Lombardozzi, D., and Goodale, C.: Projections of leaf area index in earth system models, Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 211–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-211-2016, 2016. · DOI
  62. Mao, J., Shi, X., Thornton, P. E., Hoffman, F. M., Zhu, Z., and Myneni, R. B.: Global latitudinal-asymmetric vegetation growth trends and their driving mechanisms: 1982–2009, Remote Sens., 5, 1484–1497, 2013. · DOI
  63. Martin, E. R. and Thorncroft, C.: Representation of African Easterly Waves in CMIP5 models, J. Climate, 28, 7702–7715, 2015. · DOI
  64. Martin, G. M.: The simulation of the Asian summer monsoon, and its sensitivity to horizontal resolution, in the UK meteorological office unified model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 1499–1525, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555703, 1999. · doi:10.1256/smsqj.55702
  65. Marzocchi, A., Hirschi, J. J.-M., Holliday, N. P., Cunningham, S. A., Blaker, A. T., and Coward, A. C.: The North Atlantic subpolar circulation in an eddy-resolving global ocean model, J. Marine Syst., 142, 126–143, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  66. Masson, S., Terray, P., Madec, G., Luo, J.-J., Yamagata, T., and Takahashi, K.: Impact of intra-daily SST variability on ENSO characteristics in a coupled model, Clim. Dynam., 39, 681–707, 2012. · DOI
  67. Mearns, L. O., Sain, S., Leung, L. R., Bukovsky, M. S., McGinnis, S., Biner, S., Caya, D., Arritt, R. W., Gutowski, W., Takle, E., Synder, M., Jones, R. G., Nunes, A. M. B., Tucker, S., Herzmann, D., McDaniel, L., and Sloan, L.: Climate change projections of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP), Clim. Change Lett., 120, 965–975, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0831-3, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  68. Mecking, J. V., Drijfhout, S. S., Jackson, L. C., and Graham, T.: Stable AMOC off state in an eddy-permitting coupled climate model, Clim. Dynam., 47, 2455–2470, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-2975-0, 2016. · DOI
  69. Minobe, S., Kuwano-Yoshida, A., Komori, N., Xie, S.-P., and Small, R. J.: Influence of the Gulf Stream on the troposphere, Nature, 452, 206–209, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06690, 2008. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Mizielinski, M. S., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Schiemann, R., Demory, M.-E., Strachan, J., Edwards, T., Stephens, A., Lawrence, B. N., Pritchard, M., Chiu, P., Iwi, A., Churchill, J., del Cano Novales, C., Kettleborough, J., Roseblade, W., Selwood, P., Foster, M., Glover, M., and Malcolm, A.: High-resolution global climate modelling: the UPSCALE project, a large-simulation campaign, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1629–1640, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1629-2014, 2014. · DOI
  71. Murakami, H., Vecchi, G. A., Underwood, S., Delworth, T. L., Wittenberg, A. T., Anderson, W. G., Chen, J.-H., Gudgel, R. G., Harris, L. M., Lin, S.-J., and Zeng, F.: Simulation and Prediction of Category 4 and 5 Hurricanes in the High-Resolution GFDL HiFLOR Coupled Climate Model, J. Climate, 28, 9058–9079, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0216.1, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Navarra, A., Kinter, J. L., and Tribbia, J.: Crucial experiments in climate science, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 343–352, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2712.1, 2010. · doi:10.1175/2009bams2712.1
  73. Neiman, P. J., Schick, L. J., Ralph, F. M., Hughes, M., and Wick, G. A.: Flooding in western Washington: The connection to atmospheric rivers, J. Hydrometeor., 12, 1337–1358, 2011. · DOI · Paper page
  74. Nobre, P., De Almeida, R. A., Malagutti, M., and Giarolla, E.: Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Variations over the South Atlantic Ocean, J. Climate, 25, 6349–6358, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00444.1, 2012. · DOI
  75. Novak, L., Ambaum, M. H. P., and Tailleux, R.: The life cycle of the North Atlantic storm track, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 821–833, 2015. · doi:10.1175/jas-d-14-0082.1
  76. O'Reilly, C. H., Minobe, S., and Kuwano-Yoshida, A.: The influence of the Gulf Stream on wintertime European blocking, Clim. Dynam., 47, 1545–1567, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2919-0, 2015. · DOI
  77. Parfitt, R., Czaja, A., Minobe, S., and Kuwano-Yoshida, A.: The atmospheric frontal response to SST perturbations in the Gulf Stream region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2299–2306, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067723, 2016. · doi:10.1002/2016gl067723
  78. Patricola, C. M. and Chang, P.: The Benguela Low-Level Coastal Jet: Structure, Dynamics, and Biases in Models and Reanalyses, Clim. Dynam., in review, 2016. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Peatman, S. C., Matthews, A. J., and Stevens, D. P.: Propagation of the Madden–Julian Oscillation and scale interaction with the diurnal cycle in a high-resolution GCM, Clim. Dynam., 45, 2901–2918, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2513-5, 2015. · DOI
  80. Rackow, T., Goessling, H. F., Jung, T., Sidorenko, D., Semmler, T., Barbi, D., and Handorf, D.: Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6-FESOM, Part II: climate variability, Clim. Dynam., 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3192-6, 2016. · DOI
  81. Ralph, F. M., Neiman, P. J., Wick, G. A., Gutman, S. I., Dettinger, M. D., Cayan, D. R., and White, A. B.: Flooding on California's Russian River: role of atmospheric rivers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13801, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026689, 2006. · DOI · Paper page
  82. Rathmann, N. M., Yang, S., and Kaas, E.: Tropical cyclones in enhanced resolution CMIP5 experiments, Clim. Dynam., 42, 665–681, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1818-5, 2014. · DOI
  83. Reynolds, R., Rayner, N., Smith, T., Stokes, D., and Wang, W.: An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate, J. Climate, 15, 1609–1625, 2002. · DOI · Paper page
  84. Roberts, M. J., Clayton, A., Demory, M.-E., Donners, J., Vidale, P. L., Shaffrey, L., Stevens, D. P., Stevens, I., Wood, R. A., and Slingo, J.: Impact of Resolution on the Tropical Pacific Circulation in a Matrix of Coupled Models, J. Climate, 22, 2541–2556, 2009. · DOI
  85. Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Mizielinski, M., Demory, M.-E., Schiemann, R., Strachan, J., Hodges, K., Camp, J., and Bell, R.: Tropical cyclones in the UPSCALE ensemble of high resolution global climate models, J. Climate, 28, 574–596, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00131.1, 2015. · DOI
  86. Robertson, A. W. and Mechoso, C. R.: Interannual and Interdecadal Variability of the South Atlantic Convergence Zone, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 2947–2957, 2000. · DOI · Paper page
  87. Robertson, A. W., Ferrara, J. D., and Mechoso, C. R.: Simulations of the atmospheric response to South Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies, J. Climate, 16, 2540–2551, 2003. · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<2540:sotart>2.0.co;2
  88. Rowell, D. P.: Simulating SST Teleconnections to Africa: What is the State of the Art?, J. Climate, 26, 5397–5418, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00761.1, 2013. · DOI
  89. Rummukainen, M.: Added value in regional climate modeling, WIREs Clim. Change, 7, 145–159, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.378, 2015. · DOI
  90. Sakaguchi, K., Leung, L. R., Zhao, C., Yang, Q., Lu, J., Hagos, S., Ringler, T. D., Rauscher, S. A., and Dong, L.: Exploring a multi-resolution approach using AMIP simulations, J. Climate, 28, 5549–5574, 2015. · DOI
  91. Sakamoto, T. T., Komuro, Y., Nishimura, T., Ishi, M., Tatebe, H., Shiogama, H., Hasegawa, A., Toyoda, T., Mori, M., Suzuki, T., Imada, Y., Nozawa, T., Takata, K., Mochizuki, T., Ogochi, K., Emori, S., Hasumi, H., and Kimoto, M.: MIROC4h – A New High-Resolution Atmosphere-Ocean Coupled General Circulation Model, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 90, 325–359, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2012-301, 2012. · DOI · Paper page
  92. Sanderson, B. M., Knutti, R., and Caldwell, P.: Addressing Interdependency in a Multimodel Ensemble by Interpolation of Model Properties, J. Climate, 28, 5150–5170, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00361.1, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  93. Sato, T., Miura, H., Satoh, M., Takayabu, Y. N., and Wang, Y. Q.: Diurnal cycle of precipitation in the tropics simulated in a global cloud-resolving model, J. Climate, 22, 4809–4826, 2009. · DOI · Paper page
  94. Satoh, M., Tomita, H., Yashiro, H., Miura, H., Kodama, C., Seiki, T., Noda, A. T., Yamada, Y., Goto, D., Sawada, M., Miyoshi, T., Niwa, Y., Hara, M., Ohno, Y., Iga, S., Arakawa, T., Inoue, T., and Kubokawa, H.: The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: Description and development, Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 1, 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-014-0018-1, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
  95. Scaife, A. A., Copsey, D., Gordon, C., Harris, C., Hinton, T., Keeley, S. J., O'Neill, A., Roberts, M., and Williams, K.: Improved atlantic blocking in a climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L23703, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049573, 2011. · DOI · Paper page
  96. Schiemann, R., Demory, M.-E., Shaffrey, L. C., Strachan, J., Vidale, P. L., Mizielinski, M. S., Roberts, M. J., Matsueda, M., Wehner, M. F., and Jung, T.: The resolution sensitivity of northern hemisphere blocking in four 25 km atmospheric global circulation models, J. Climate, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0100.1, in press, 2016. · DOI
  97. Scoccimarro, E., Gualdi, S., and Navarra, A.: Tropical cyclone effects on arctic sea ice variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L17704, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052987, 2012. · doi:10.1029/2012gl052987
  98. Scoccimarro, E., Gualdi, S., Villarini, G., Vecchi, G., Zhao, M., Walsh, K., and Navarra, A.: Intense precipitation events associated with landfalling tropical cyclones in response to a warmer climate and increased CO2, J. Climate, 27, 4642–4654, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00065.1, 2014. · DOI
  99. Sein, D. V., Danilov, S., Biastoch, A., Durgadoo, J., Sidorenko, D., Harig, S., and Wang, Q.: Designing variable ocean model resolution based on the observed ocean variability, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 8, 904–916, 2016. · DOI
  100. Shaevitz, D., Camargo, S. J., Sobel, A. H., Jonas, J. A., Kim, D., Kumar, A., LaRow, T. E., Lim, Y.-K., Murakami, H., Reed, K., Roberts, M. J., Scoccimarro, E., Vidale, P. L., Wang, H., Wehner, M. F., Zhao, M., and Henderson, N.: Characteristics of tropical cyclones in high-resolution models in the present climate, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 1154–1172, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000372, 2014. · DOI
  101. Shaffrey, L. C., Stevens, I., Norton, W. A., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Harle, J. D., Jrrar, A., Stevens, D. P., Woodage, M. J., Demory, M. E., Donners, J., Clark, D. B., Clayton, A., Cole, J. W., Wilson, S. S., Connolley, W. M., Davies, T. M., Iwi, A., M., John, T., C., King, J. C., New, A. L., Slingo, J. M., Slingo, A., Steenman-Clark, L., and Martin, M.: U.K. HiGEM: the new U.K. High-Resolution Global Environment Model-model description and basic evaluation, J. Climate, 22, 1861–1896, 2009. · DOI · Paper page
  102. Small, R. J., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D. A., Baker, A., Bishop, S., Bryan, F. O., Caron, J., Dennis, J., Gent, P. R., Hsu, H.-M., Jochum, M., Lawrence, D. M., Munoz Acevedo, E., diNezio, P., Scheitlin, T., Tomas, R., Tribbia, J., Tseng, Y., and Vertenstein, M.: A new synoptic-scale resolving global climate simulation using the Community Earth System Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 1065–1094, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000363, 2014a. · DOI · Paper page
  103. Small, R. J., Tomas, R. A., and Bryan, F. O.: Storm track response to ocean fronts in a global high-resolution climate model, Clim. Dynam., 43, 805–828, 2014b. · doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1980-9
  104. Small, R. J., Curchitser, E., Hedstrom, K., Kauffman, B., and Large, W. G.: The Benguela upwelling system: Quantifying the sensitivity to resolution and coastal wind representation in a global climate model, J. Climate, 28, 9409–9432, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0192.1, 2015. · DOI
  105. Smith, R. D., Maltrud, M. E., Bryan, F. O., and Hecht, M. W.: Numerical Simulation of the North Atlantic Ocean at 1/10°, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 1532–1561, 2000. · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<1532:nsotna>2.0.co;2
  106. Sperber, K. R., Sultan, H., Potter, G. L., and Boyle, J. S.: Simulation of the Northern summer monsoon in the ECMWF model: sensitivity to horizontal resolution, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 2461–2481, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<2461:SOTNSM>2.0.CO;2, 1994. · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<2461:sotnsm>2.0.co;2
  107. Sterl, A., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Hazeleger, W., and Burgers, G.: On the Robustness of ENSO teleconnenctions, Clim. Dynam., 29, 469–485, 2007. · DOI
  108. Stevens, B., Fiedler, S., Kinne, S., Peters, K., Rast, S., Müsse, J., Smith, S. J., and Mauritsen, T.: Simple Plumes: A parameterization of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated Twomey effect for climate studies, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2016-189, in review, 2016. · DOI
  109. Strachan, P., Vidale, P. L., Hodges, K., Roberts, M., and Demory, M. E.: Investigating global tropical cyclone activity with a hierarchy of agcms: the role of model resolution, J. Climate, 26, 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00012.1, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  110. Sutton, R. and Mathieu, P.-P.: Response of the atmosphere–ocean mixed-layer system to anomalous ocean heat-flux convergence, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 1259–1275, 2002. · doi:10.1256/003590002320373283
  111. Titchner, H. A. and Rayner, N. A.: The Met Office Hadley Centre sea ice and sea surface temperature data set, version 2: 1. Sea ice concentrations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2864–2889, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020316, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
  112. Van Haren, R., Haarsma, R. J., van Oldenborgh, G. J., and Hazeleger, W.: Resolution dependence of European precipitation in a state-of-the-art atmospheric general circulation model, J. Climate, 28, 5134–5149, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00279.1, 2014. · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-14-00279.1
  113. Van Haren, R., Haarsma, R. J., de Vries, H., van Oldenborgh, G. J., and Hazeleger, W.: Resolution dependence of circulation forced future central European summer drying, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 055002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/055002, 2015. · DOI
  114. Vellinga, M., Roberts, M., Vidale, P. L., Mizielinski, M., Demory, M.-E., Schiemann, R., Strachan, J., Bain, C., Kettleborough, J., Good, P., Edmond, I., and Hibling, E.: Organised convection as the main carrier of Sahel rainfall variability at multi-annual timescales, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 326–333, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066690, 2016. · DOI
  115. Villarini, G., Lavers, D. A., Scoccimarro, E., Zhao, M., Wehner, M. F., Vecchi, G., and Knutson, T.: Sensitivity of tropical cyclone rainfall to idealized global scale forcings, J. Climate, 27, 4622–4641, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00780.1, 2014. · DOI
  116. Walsh, K., Lavender, S., Scoccimarro, E., and Murakami, H.: Resolution dependence of tropical cyclone formation in CMIP3 and finer resolution models, Clim. Dynam., 40, 585–599, 2012. · DOI
  117. Walsh, K., Camargo, S. J., Vecchi, G. A., Daloz, A. S., Elsner, J., Emanuel, K., Horn, J. M., Lim, Y.-K., Roberts, M., Patricola, C., Scoccimarro, E., Sobel, A., Strazzo, S., Villarini, G., Wehner, M., Zhao, M., Kossin, J. P., LaRow, T., Oouchi, K., Schubert, S., Wang, H., Bacmeister, J., Chang, P., Chauvin, F., Jablonowski, C., Kumar, A., Murakami, H., Ose, T., Reed, K. A., Saravanan, R., Yamada, Y., Zarzycki, C. M., Vidale, P. L., Jonas, J. A., and Henderson, N.: Hurricanes and climate: the U.S. CLIVAR working group on hurricanes, B. Am. Meterol. Soc., 96, 997–1017, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00242.1, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  118. Wang, B., Ding, Q., Fu, X., Kang, I.-S., Jin, K., Shukla, J., and Doblas-Reyes, F.: Fundamental challenge in simulation and prediction of summer monsoon rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L15711, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022734, 2005. · DOI · Paper page
  119. Watterson, I. G., Bathols, J., and Heady, C.: What influences the skill of climate models over the continents?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 689–700, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00136.1, 2014. · DOI
  120. Wehner, M. F., Smith, R., Duffy, P., and Bala, G.: The effect of horizontal resolution on simulation of very extreme US precipitation events in a global atmosphere model, Clim. Dynam., 32, 241–247, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0656-y, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  121. Woollings, T., Hoskins, B., Blackburn, M., Hassell, D., and Hodges K.: Storm track sensitivity to sea surface temperature resolution in a regional atmosphere model, Clim. Dynam., 35, 341–353, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0554-3, 2010. · doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0554-3
  122. Wu, R. and Kirtman, B. P.: Regimes of seasonal air-sea interaction and implications for performance of forced simulations, Clim. Dynam, 29, 393–410, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0246-9, 2007. · DOI
  123. Yoshida, R. and Ishikawa, H.: Environmental factors contributing to tropical cyclone genesis over the western North Pacific, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 451–467, 2013. · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-11-00309.1
  124. Zappa, G., Shaffrey, L., and Hodges, K.: Can polar lows be objectively identified and tracked in the ECMWF operational analysis and the ERA-Interim reanalysis?, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 2596–2608, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00064.1, 2014. · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-14-00064.1
  125. Zhang, Y., Maslowski, W., and Semtner, A. J.: Impact of mesoscale ocean currents on sea ice in high-resolution Arctic ice and ocean simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 18409–18429, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900158, 1999. · DOI
  126. Zhao, M., Held, I. M., Lin, S. J., and Vecchi, G. A.: Simulations of Global Hurricane Climatology, Interannual Variability, and Response to Global Warming Using a 50 km Resolution GCM, J. Climate, 33, 6653–6678, 2009. · DOI · Paper page
  127. Zhu, Y. and Newell, R. E.: A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from atmospheric rivers, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 725–735, 1998. · DOI · Paper page
  128. Zhu, Z., Bi, J., Pan, Y., Ganguly, S., Anav, A., Xu, L., Samanta, A., Piao, S., Nemani, R. R., and Myneni, R. B.: Global data sets of vegetation leaf area index (LAI) 3g and fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) 3g derived from global inventory modeling and mapping studies (GIMMS) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI3g) for the period 1981 to 2011, Remote Sens, 5, 927–948, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  129. Zuidema, P., Chang, P., Medeiros, B., Kirtman, B. P., Mechoso, R., Schneider, E. K., Toniazzo, T., Richter, I., Small, R. J., Bellomo, K., Brandt, P., de Szoeke, S., Farrar, J. T., Jung, E., Kato, S., Li, M., Patricola, C. M., Wang, Z., Wood, R., and Xu, Z.: Challenges and Prospects for Reducing Coupled Climate Model SST Biases in the eastern tropical Atlantic and Pacific Oceans: The US CLIVAR Eastern Tropical Oceans Synthesis Working Group, B. Am. Meterol. Soc., https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00274.1, in press, 2016. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,149

Metadata

Authors
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Satoh, M., Scoccimarro, E., Semmler, T., Small, J., & von Storch, J.-S.
Venue
Geoscientific Model Development
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Published
2016-11-22
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
4185-4208
ISSN
  • 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
  • 1991-9603
DOI
10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016
OpenAlex
W2550337802
Cited by
1,149
References
3
FWCI
34.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016
The paper
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., . . . von Storch, J.-S. (2016). High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6. Geoscientific Model Development. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.