The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making Management Decisions: the Role of Intuition and Emotion
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256434 · Cited by 3,818
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021 · Cited by 2,628
The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177 · Cited by 2,228
Introductory Essay—Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis
Weick, K. E. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.5.543 · Cited by 1,014
Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840604042412 · Cited by 369
The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective
Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616655483 · Cited by 324
“…type of intuition – expert intuition or problem-solving intuition – in which the intuitive process is not random or irrational but is based on experience and a solid and complete grasp of a problem’s details (Dane & Pratt, 2007; Gore & Sadler-Smith, 2011; Khatri & Ng, 2000; Simon, 1987).”
Grossmann, I. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616672066 · Cited by 306
Affect, emotion, and decision making
George, J. M., & Dane, E. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.004 · Cited by 300
The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: An exploratory investigation
Mencl, J., & May, D. R. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9765-5 · Cited by 246
Teachers’ decision-making: Data based or intuition driven?
Vanlommel, K., Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.013 · Cited by 123
Crisis decision-making: the overlap between intuitive and analytical strategies
Okoli, J., & Watt, J. (2018) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2017-0333 · Cited by 100
Paradoxes and Dual Processes: A Review and Synthesis
Keller, J., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12200 · Cited by 66
Anger and fear in decision-making: The case of film directors on set
Coget, J.-F., Haag, C., & Gibson, D. E. (2011) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2011.06.003 · Cited by 52
How Does AI Improve Human Decision-Making? Evidence from the AI-Powered Go Program
Choi, S., Kim, N., Kim, J., & Kang, H. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3893835 · Cited by 30
Parikh, N. A. (2023) · Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1634-4.ch016 · Cited by 29
Vanlommel, K., Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100865 · Cited by 18
The InBoard Emotional Contagion Model
Haag, C., & Getz, I. (2016) · Emotions and Organizational Governance · doi:10.1108/s1746-979120160000012005 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Simon, H. A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Perspectives
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-64
- ISSN
- 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4529
- OpenAlex
- W2068540835
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.