Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Very Separate Worlds of Academic and Practitioner Periodicals in Human Resource Management: Implications for Evidence-Based Management

Rynes, Sara L., Giluk, Tamara L., Brown, Kenneth G.·2007·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.5465/amj.2007.27151939
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this article the authors examine the differences between academic journals that deal with theoretical questions of personnel management and periodicals that investigate human resource management issues that occur in real-life situations. They note that there is a significant difference between human resource management as practiced in an academic setting as opposed to in the workplace. The management process known as “evidence-based management” is examined, the practice defined as an application that allows managers to use social science and organizational research to handle personnel matters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2007.27151939

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., & Brown, K. G.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2007-10
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
987-1008
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.5465/amj.2007.27151939
OpenAlex
W2151172632
Cited by
485
References
8
FWCI
188.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.