The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building
Abstract
Traditional approaches to theory building are not entirely consistent with the assumptions of alternative research paradigms that are now assuming more prominence in organizational study. We argue for a multiparadigm approach to theory building as a means of establishing correspondence between paradigms and theory-construction efforts. Because of the implications of the multiparadigm approach, we also examine ways of bridging across blurred paradigm boundaries. In addition, we explore a metaparadigm perspective that might allow disparate approaches to theory building to be considered together. Such a perspective can produce views of organizational phenomena that not only allow scholars to recognize inherent and irreconcilable theoretical differences, but also can encourage them to adopt a more comprehensive view by accounting for those differences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A well demonstrated way to clarify such conceptual confusion and correct the absence of a paradigmatic context for the research is to examine the paradigmatic assumptions of the field, that is, ontology, epistemology, and methodology (Dewulf et al., 2009;Gioia & Pitre, 1990).”
From Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground (2016) · cites this paper as Gioia & Pitre, 1990
In the citing paper
“The fourth position, inter-ontology crossovers, focuses on interactions between ontologies (Gioia and Pitre, 1990;Lewis and Grimes, 1999).Crossover approaches recognize differences between ontologies, but work on dynamic interplay rather than overarching synthesis.Ontologies are not perceived as pieces in a jigsaw puzzle, but also not accepted as fully incommensurable.Instead, this position is”
From Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective (2010) · cites this paper as Gioia and Pitre, 1990
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,820
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,235
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Cited by
Items 101–200 of 1,000
A holistic market conceptualization
Mele, C., Pels, J., & Storbacka, K. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0383-8 · Cited by 166
Theorizing about resource integration through service-dominant logic
Peters, L. D., Löbler, H., Brodie, R. J., Breidbach, C. F., Hollebeek, L. D., Smith, S. D., Sörhammar, D., & Varey, R. J. (2014) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593114534341 · Cited by 163
Entering a Dialogue: Positioning Case Study Findings towards Theory
Ridder, H., Hoon, C., & Baluch, A. M. (2012) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12000 · Cited by 161
Theory map of business marketing: Relationships and networks perspectives
Möller, K. (2013) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.009 · Cited by 161
Gephart, R. P., Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1993.9402210162 · Cited by 157
Career studies in search of theory: the rise and rise of concepts
Baruch, Y., Szűcs, N., & Gunz, H. P. (2015) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/cdi-11-2013-0137 · Cited by 156
Enabling Courageous Collective Action: Conversations from United Airlines Flight 93
Quinn, R. W., & Worline, M. C. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0331 · Cited by 155
Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in Kuwait
Al-Shammari, B. A., & Al-Sultan, W. (2010) · International Journal of Disclosure and Governance · doi:10.1057/jdg.2010.3 · Cited by 154
Brown, M. E., & Gioia, D. A. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00123-6 · Cited by 153
Self-citationNarrative approach in business network process research — Implications for theory and methodology
Makkonen, H., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Olkkonen, R. (2012) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.012 · Cited by 140
Theory Assessment and Agenda Setting in Political CSR: A Critical Theory Perspective
Scherer, A. G. (2018) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12137 · Cited by 149
Scherer, A. G. (1998) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050849852001 · Cited by 148
Perren, L., & Grant, P. (2000) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1006/mare.2000.0141 · Cited by 148
Supply management: is it a discipline?
Harland, C. M., Lamming, R., Walker, H., Phillips, W., Caldwell, N., Johnsen, T., Knight, L. A., & Zheng, J. (2006) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570610672211 · Cited by 145
Exploring Corporations’ Dialogue About CSR in the Digital Era
Illia, L., Romenti, S., Cánovas, B. R., Murtarelli, G., & Carroll, C. E. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2924-6 · Cited by 142
Drivers of workforce agility: a dynamic capability perspective
Ajgaonkar, S., Neelam, N. G., & Wiemann, J. (2021) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-11-2020-2507 · Cited by 142
Consumer trust repair: A critical literature review
Božić, B. (2017) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2017.02.007 · Cited by 141
Gleasure, R., & Feller, J. (2016) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2016.09.001 · Cited by 137
Keegan, A. E., & Boselie, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00638.x · Cited by 136
The Meaning of Organizational Learning: A Meta-Paradigm Perspective
Popova-Nowak, I. V., & Cseh, M. (2015) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484315596856 · Cited by 133
Theoretical perspectives in operations management: an analysis of the literature
Walker, H., Chicksand, D., Radnor, Z., & Watson, G. (2015) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-02-2014-0089 · Cited by 133
Triangulation in Organizational Research: A Re-Presentation
Cox, J. W., & Hassard, J. S. (2004) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508405048579 · Cited by 131
Andersen, P. H., & Kragh, H. (2009) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.02.008 · Cited by 130
Relativity Without Relativism: Reflexivity in Post‐Paradigm Organization Studies
Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. R. (1997) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.8.s1.2 · Cited by 129
A taxonomy of measures for consumer‐based brand equity: drawing on the views of managers in Europe
Veloutsou, C. A., Christodoulides, G., & de Chernatony, L. (2013) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-02-2013-0256 · Cited by 127
Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A., & Swan, J. A. (2005) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613210500288837 · Cited by 127
Classifying relationship structures: relationship strength in industrial markets
Donaldson, B., & Toole, T. O. (2000) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/08858620010351724 · Cited by 127
Production and Consumption in Organizational Knowledge: The Case of the `Paradigms Debate'
Hassard, J. S., & Kelemen, M. (2002) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508402009002911 · Cited by 126
In Their Profession's Service: How Staff Professionals Exert Influence in Their Organization
Daudigeos, T. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12021 · Cited by 127
Community policing, loose coupling, and sensemaking in American police agencies
Maguire, E. R., & Katz, C. M. (2002) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418820200095331 · Cited by 124
Governance of Wicked Climate Adaptation Problems
Termeer, C. J. A. M., Dewulf, A. R. P. J., & Breeman, G. E. (2012) · Climate change management · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29831-8_3 · Cited by 124
Combining PSMs with hard OR methods: the philosophical and practical challenges
Kotiadis, K., & Mingers, J. (2006) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602147 · Cited by 124
Imperatives of the science of operations and supply‐chain management
Singhal, K., & Singhal, J. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.11.003 · Cited by 123
Fischer, M. J. (1996) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(95)00005-4 · Cited by 119
Tourish, D. (2018) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840618789207 · Cited by 118
Brodie, R. J., Löbler, H., & Fehrer, J. A. (2019) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.03.003 · Cited by 117
The Uniqueness Value and its Consequences for Organization Studies
Mone, M. A., & McKinley, W. (1993) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/105649269323010 · Cited by 115
Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: learning from forest ecosystems
O'Connor, A. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2022) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-022-00623-8 · Cited by 114
Kiessling, T. S., & Harvey, M. G. (2004) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/0958519042000295939 · Cited by 114
Eisenhardt's impact on theory in case study research
Ravenswood, K. (2010) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.08.014 · Cited by 113
Peters, L. D., Pressey, A. D., Vanharanta, M., & Johnston, W. J. (2013) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.003 · Cited by 113
Gubbins, C., & Dooley, L. (2021) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21423 · Cited by 112
From Big Data to Rich Theory: Integrating Critical Discourse Analysis with Structural Topic Modeling
Aranda, A. M., Sele, K., Etchanchu, H., Guyt, J. Y., & Vaara, E. (2021) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12452 · Cited by 111
Modell, S., Vinnari, E. M., & Lukka, K. (2017) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.06.005 · Cited by 110
The Integration of Psychological and Network Perspectives in Organizational Scholarship
Casciaro, T., Barsade, S. G., Edmondson, A. C., Gibson, C. B., Krackhardt, D. M., & Labianca, G. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.0988 · Cited by 108
A (Re)view of the Philosophical Foundations of Strategic Management
Rabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M., & Federico, J. (2020) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12244 · Cited by 106
Philosophies in entrepreneurship: a focus on economic theories
Pittaway, L. (2005) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/13552550510598790 · Cited by 105
A Multi-Methodology Approach to Creating a Causal Loop Diagram
Dhirasasna, N., & Sahin, O. (2019) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems7030042 · Cited by 101
Theory and Concept Development in Political Marketing: Issues and an Agenda
Henneberg, S. C. M., & O’Shaughnessy, N. J. (2007) · Journal of Political Marketing · doi:10.1300/j199v06n02_02 · Cited by 101
Reactive planning in a Christian Bureaucracy
Parker, L. D. (2001) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1006/mare.2001.0165 · Cited by 101
Blurring B2C and B2B boundaries: corporate brand value co-creation in B2B2C markets
Mingione, M., & Leoni, L. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2019.1694566 · Cited by 100
Challenges and choices for theoretical research in human resource development
Torraco, R. J. (2004) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.1097 · Cited by 100
Integrating corporate branding and sociological paradigms: A literature study
Hulberg, J. (2006) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550054 · Cited by 100
Cornelissen, J., Kafouros, M. I., & Lock, A. R. (2005) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726705061317 · Cited by 100
Porter, T. B. (2008) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.902 · Cited by 100
Campbell, C. R., & Martinko, M. J. (1998) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80059-2 · Cited by 99
Some Remarks on the Problem of Incommensurability in Organization Studies
Scherer, A. G., & Steinmann, H. (1999) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840699203006 · Cited by 97
Keeping the Tension: Pressures to Keep the Controversy in the Management Discipline
Fabian, F. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3312922 · Cited by 96
Alvesson, M. G., & Sandberg, J. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12969 · Cited by 94
Karataş‐Özkan, M., & Murphy, W. D. (2009) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00273.x · Cited by 94
Case sensitive? A review of the literature on the use of case method in entrepreneurship research
Henry, C., & Foss, L. (2015) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-03-2014-0054 · Cited by 94
Vera, D. M., Crossan, M. M., & Apaydın, M. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119207245.ch8 · Cited by 93
Bresser, R. K. F., & Millonig, K. (2003) · Schmalenbach Business Review · doi:10.1007/bf03396675 · Cited by 92
Foucault Plays Habermas: An Alternative Philosophical Underpinning for Critical Systems Thinking
Brocklesby, J., & Cummings, S. P. (1996) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1996.95 · Cited by 92
Thrane, S., & Hald, K. S. (2006) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2006.06.001 · Cited by 92
Rigour in qualitative research
Whiteley, A. M. (2002) · eSpace (Curtin University) · Cited by 92
Revisiting Paradigm(s) in Management Research: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Paradigm Wars
Shepherd, C., & Challenger, R. (2012) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12004 · Cited by 91
Analytical lenses on barriers in the governance of climate change adaptation
Biesbroek, R. G., Termeer, C. J. A. M., Klostermann, J. E. M., & Kabat, P. (2013) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9457-z · Cited by 90
Toward an integrative cartography of two strategic issue diagnosis frameworks
Julian, S. D., & Ofori‐Dankwa, J. C. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.647 · Cited by 90
Moriarty, J. P. (2011) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/14635771111147650 · Cited by 90
Theorizing as Engaged Practice
Zundel, M., & Kokkalis, P. (2010) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840610374405 · Cited by 89
Marolt, M., Zimmermann, H., Žnidaršič, A., & Pucihar, A. (2020) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.4067/s0718-18762020000200104 · Cited by 89
The discourses of marketing and development: towards ‘critical transformative marketing research’
Tadajewski, M., Chelekis, J. A., DeBerry‐Spence, B., Figueiredo, B., Kravets, O., Nuttavuthisit, K., Peñaloza, L., & Moisander, J. K. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2014.952660 · Cited by 89
Marabelli, M., & Newell, S. (2023) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101774 · Cited by 88
Social Class and Work: A Review and Organizing Framework
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Moergen, K. J. N., Tilton, J., & Gray, B. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221076822 · Cited by 87
A note on Penrosean growth, resource bundles and the Uppsala model of internationalisation
Steen, J. T., & Liesch, P. W. (2007) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-007-0011-7 · Cited by 87
Sage, D. J., Dainty, A., & Brookes, N. J. (2013) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.08.005 · Cited by 86
The Evolution of Capital Theory: A Critique of a Theory of Social Capital and Implications for HRD
Storberg‐Walker, J. (2002) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484302238437 · Cited by 86
Hoon, C., & Baluch, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12543 · Cited by 85
Paradigm Interplay for Theory Development: A Methodological Example With the Kulturstandard Method
Romani, L., Primecz, H., & Topçu, K. (2011) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109358270 · Cited by 85
Business relationships in China: lessons about deep trust
Kriz, A., & Keating, B. W. (2010) · Asia Pacific Business Review · doi:10.1080/13602380903065580 · Cited by 84
Islam, G. (2014) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114555992 · Cited by 85
On Celebrating the Organizational Identity Metaphor: A Rejoinder to Cornelissen
Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2002) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00243 · Cited by 81
Self-citationA systems model of organizational change
Maes, G., & Hootegem, G. V. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-07-2017-0268 · Cited by 80
A theoretical analysis of the value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC)
Marzo, G. (2021) · Journal of Management & Governance · doi:10.1007/s10997-021-09565-x · Cited by 80
Editors’ Comments: “What I Know Now That I Wish I Knew Then”—Teaching Theory and Theory Building
Byron, K., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0094 · Cited by 80
The process of information systems theorizing as a discursive practice
Hassan, N. R., Mathiassen, L., & Lowry, P. B. (2019) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/0268396219832004 · Cited by 80
Troise, C., Battisti, E., Christofi, M., van Vulpen, N. J., & Tarba, S. Y. (2022) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-022-00493-y · Cited by 79
Manufacturing the Past: Loss and Absence in Organizational Change
Cox, J. W. (1997) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069701800404 · Cited by 79
Equity crowdfunding and the role of investor discussion boards
Kleinert, S., & Volkmann, C. K. (2019) · Venture Capital · doi:10.1080/13691066.2019.1569853 · Cited by 78
The integral holon: A holonomic approach to organisational change and transformation
Edwards, M. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534810510599425 · Cited by 78
A philosophical framework for thought and practice in human resource development
Ruona, W. E. A., & Lynham, S. A. (2004) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678860310001630665 · Cited by 78
Geographic information science as a multidisciplinary and multiparadigmatic field
Blaschke, T., & Merschdorf, H. (2014) · Cartography and Geographic Information Science · doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.905755 · Cited by 77
Managing Coordination in Multiteam Systems: Integrating Micro and Macro Perspectives
Vries, T. A. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., Davison, R. B., Walter, F. H., & van der Vegt, G. S. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0385 · Cited by 77
Critique and Theory Building: Producing Knowledge "From the Kitchen"
Jacques, R. S. (1992) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4282015 · Cited by 77
Making institutional accounting research critical: dead end or new beginning?
Modell, S. (2015) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-09-2013-1457 · Cited by 75
Dee, J. R., & Leišytė, L. (2016) · Higher education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3_6 · Cited by 75
Midgley, G., Nicholson, J. D., & Brennan, R. (2016) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.08.008 · Cited by 75
Man vs machine: examining the three themes of service robotics in tourism and hospitality
Manthiou, A., Klaus, P., Kuppelwieser, V. G., & Reeves, W. (2020) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00434-3 · Cited by 74
Firm boundary decisions in solution business: Examining internal vs. external resource integration
Salonen, A., & Jaakkola, E. (2015) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.002 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- HEC Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 584
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126321946
- Cited by
- 1,426
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- theory development, research paradigms, multi-paradigm approach, metaparadigm, organizational theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.