The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building
Abstract
Traditional approaches to theory building are not entirely consistent with the assumptions of alternative research paradigms that are now assuming more prominence in organizational study. We argue for a multiparadigm approach to theory building as a means of establishing correspondence between paradigms and theory-construction efforts. Because of the implications of the multiparadigm approach, we also examine ways of bridging across blurred paradigm boundaries. In addition, we explore a metaparadigm perspective that might allow disparate approaches to theory building to be considered together. Such a perspective can produce views of organizational phenomena that not only allow scholars to recognize inherent and irreconcilable theoretical differences, but also can encourage them to adopt a more comprehensive view by accounting for those differences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A well demonstrated way to clarify such conceptual confusion and correct the absence of a paradigmatic context for the research is to examine the paradigmatic assumptions of the field, that is, ontology, epistemology, and methodology (Dewulf et al., 2009;Gioia & Pitre, 1990).”
From Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground (2016) · cites this paper as Gioia & Pitre, 1990
In the citing paper
“The fourth position, inter-ontology crossovers, focuses on interactions between ontologies (Gioia and Pitre, 1990;Lewis and Grimes, 1999).Crossover approaches recognize differences between ontologies, but work on dynamic interplay rather than overarching synthesis.Ontologies are not perceived as pieces in a jigsaw puzzle, but also not accepted as fully incommensurable.Instead, this position is”
From Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective (2010) · cites this paper as Gioia and Pitre, 1990
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,820
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,235
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Cited by
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Unlearning Troubled Business Models: From Realization to Marginalization
Mehrizi, M. H. R., & Lashkarbolouki, M. (2016) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.005 · Cited by 74
Cross-Cultural Management Research: Contributions from Various Paradigms
Primecz, H., Romani, L., & Sackmann, S. A. (2009) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/1470595809346603 · Cited by 74
The theory of constraints: a methodology apart?—a comparison with selected OR/MS methodologies
Davies, J. A., Mabin, V. J., & Balderstone, S. J. (2004) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.015 · Cited by 73
Kopainsky, B., & Luna‐Reyes, L. F. (2008) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.913 · Cited by 73
Appannah, A., & Biggs, S. G. (2015) · Journal of Social Work Practice · doi:10.1080/02650533.2014.993943 · Cited by 72
Critical event recognition: An extended view of reflective learning
Lindh, I., & Thorgren, S. (2015) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507615618600 · Cited by 72
Data in design: How big data and thick data inform design thinking projects
Mortati, M., Magistretti, S., Cautela, C., & Dell’Era, C. (2023) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102688 · Cited by 71
Markus, M. L., & Saunders, C. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148777 · Cited by 70
Designing an Employee Experience Approach to Teacher Retention in Hard-to-Staff Schools
Tran, H., & Smith, D. A. (2020) · NASSP Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0192636520927092 · Cited by 69
Interorganizational Marketing Exchange: Metatheoretical Analysis of Current Research Approaches
Möller, K. (1994) · International series in quantitative marketing · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1402-8_11 · Cited by 69
Purchasing social good(s): a definition and typology of social procurement
Furneaux, C. W., & Barraket, J. (2014) · Public Money & Management · doi:10.1080/09540962.2014.920199 · Cited by 69
Responding to “Discrediting” Events: Annual Report Disclosure Responses to Environmental Fines
Warsame, H. A., Simmons, C. V., & Neu, D. (2002) · Accounting and the Public Interest · doi:10.2308/api.2002.2.1.22 · Cited by 69
Jie, C. (2002) · Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis · Cited by 69
Understanding the relationship between PMS and MIS in SMEs: An organizational life cycle perspective
Garengo, P., Nudurupati, S., & Bititci, U. (2007) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.006 · Cited by 69
A Meta-theoretical framework for theory building in project management
Svejvig, P. (2021) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.09.006 · Cited by 68
External auditors' perceptions of cloud computing adoption in Australia
Yigitbasioglu, O. M. (2015) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2015.09.001 · Cited by 68
Disciplined imagination: Building scenarios and building theories
Chermack, T. J. (2006) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.03.002 · Cited by 68
Towards blockchain led decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) business model innovations
Saurabh, K., Rani, N., & Upadhyay, P. (2022) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-10-2021-0606 · Cited by 67
Modes of Explanation in Organization Theory
Scherer, A. G. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199275250.003.0012 · Cited by 67
Barmeyer, C., Bausch, M., & Moncayo, D. (2019) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/1470595819859603 · Cited by 66
Paradigms in Qualitative IB Research: Trends, Analysis and Recommendations
Aguzzoli, R., Lengler, J., Miller, S. R., & Chidlow, A. (2024) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-024-00529-5 · Cited by 66
A encruzilhada da aprendizagem organizacional: uma visão multiparadigmática
Antonello, C. S., & Godoy, A. S. (2010) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552010000200008 · Cited by 65
Strategies of Integration in Mixed Methods Research: Insights Using Relational Algorithms
Tunarosa, A., & Glynn, M. A. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428116637197 · Cited by 65
A mechanism based transition research methodology: Bridging analytical approaches
Papachristos, G. (2018) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.02.006 · Cited by 65
DEVELOPING A LAY MODEL OF MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS: A SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PERSPECTIVE
Cammock, P. A., Nilakant, V., & Dakin, S. R. (1995) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00784.x · Cited by 65
Developing service research – paving the way to transdisciplinary research
Gustafsson, A., Högström, C., Radnor, Z., Friman, M., Heinonen, K., Jaakkola, E., & Mele, C. (2016) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-03-2015-0098 · Cited by 64
An Initial Theory of Value-Based Software Engineering
BOEHM, B. W., & Jain, A. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-29263-2_2 · Cited by 64
Do we really understand business marketing? Getting beyond the RM and BM matrimony
Pels, J., Möller, K., & Saren, M. (2009) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/08858620910966219 · Cited by 64
Capper, C. A. (1998) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x98034003005 · Cited by 64
Cornelissen, J. (2023) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2022.0297 · Cited by 63
Inter-leadership: Why and How Should We Think of Leadership and Followership Integrally?
Kuepers, W. M., & Weibler, J. (2008) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715008095190 · Cited by 63
USING MULTIPLE PARADIGM RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES TO GAIN NEW INSIGHTS INTO ENTREPRENEURIAL MOTIVATIONS
Kirkwood, J., & Campbell‐Hunt, C. (2007) · Journal of Enterprising Culture · doi:10.1142/s0218495807000137 · Cited by 61
Incommensurable paradigms, cognitive bias and the politics of marketing theory
Tadajewski, M. (2008) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593108093557 · Cited by 61
Mixed Methods in Emerging Academic Subdisciplines: The Case of Sport Management
van der Roest, J.-W., Spaaij, R., & van Bottenburg, M. (2013) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689813508225 · Cited by 60
Information Technology Governance: Reflections on the Past and Future Directions
Wilkin, C. L., & Chenhall, R. H. (2019) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-52632 · Cited by 60
Organizing time: Internationalization narratives of executive managers
Middleton, S. A., Liesch, P. W., & Steen, J. T. (2010) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.07.007 · Cited by 59
Towards an emerging paradigm of strategic communication: Core driving forces
Klerk, N. O.-D., & Verwey, S. (2013) · Communicatio · doi:10.1080/02500167.2013.837626 · Cited by 59
Clearing the paradigmatic fog — how to move forward in business marketing research
Möller, K., & Halinen, A. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.021 · Cited by 59
Not without family: refugee family entrepreneurship and economic integration process
Zehra, K., & Usmani, S. (2021) · Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy · doi:10.1108/jec-03-2020-0044 · Cited by 33
A Theory of Effective Computer-Based Instruction for Adults
Lowe, J. S., & Holton, E. F. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305276301 · Cited by 58
Responding to Value Pluralism in Hybrid Organizations
Castellas, E. I.-P., Stubbs, W., & Ambrosini, V. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3809-2 · Cited by 58
Criteria for assessing theory in human resource development from an interpretive perspective
Lincoln, Y. S., & Lynham, S. A. (2011) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678868.2011.542895 · Cited by 58
Geels, F. W. (2009) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320903182280 · Cited by 58
De/Constructing Theory: A Look at the Institutional Theory that Positivism Built
Bowring, M. A. (2000) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/105649260093003 · Cited by 58
Legitimizing Corporate (Un) Sustainability: A Case Study of Passive SMEs
Chassé, S., & Boiral, O. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026616672065 · Cited by 57
Understanding the Why, What, and How of Theories in IS Research
Mueller, B., & Urbach, N. (2017) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.04117 · Cited by 57
Ghauri, P. N., Grønhaug, K., & Strange, R. N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762427.012 · Cited by 56
Management Consulting: Towards an Integrative Framework of Knowledge, Identity, and Power
Mosonyi, S., Empson, L., & Gond, J. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12218 · Cited by 56
Siebert, S., Martin, G., Božić, B., & Docherty, I. (2015) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840615580010 · Cited by 56
Is Escalation Always Irrational?
Drummond, H. (1998) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069801900601 · Cited by 55
Theory in the organizational sciences: How will we know it when we see it?
Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2011) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386611423696 · Cited by 55
Tuttle, M. (2002) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484302011004 · Cited by 55
Perspective—Open to Negotiation: Phenomenological Assumptions and Knowledge Dissemination
Bendersky, C., & McGinn, K. L. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0487 · Cited by 55
Grosskopf, S., & Barmeyer, C. (2021) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/14705958211019437 · Cited by 54
Storytelling as a Qualitative Method for IS Research: Heralding the Heroic and Echoing the Mythic
Kendall, J. E., & Kendall, K. E. (2012) · AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v17i2.697 · Cited by 54
Give it Up! Reflections on the Interpreted World (A Commentary on Meckler and Baillie)
Gioia, D. A. (2003) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492603257725 · Cited by 54
Self-citationCollaborative Learning Processes in Social Impact Bonds: A Case Study from the Netherlands
Smeets, D. J. A. (2017) · Journal of Social Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/19420676.2017.1299034 · Cited by 54
Strategic marketing planning: a grounded investigation
Ashill, N. J., Frederikson, M., & Davies, J. D. (2003) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560310459032 · Cited by 54
Toward a General Research Process for Using Dubin's Theory Building Model
Holton, E. F., & Lowe, J. S. (2007) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484307304219 · Cited by 54
Advancing Grounded Theory with Mixed Methods
Creamer, E. G. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429057007 · Cited by 53
After paradim: why mixing-methodology theorising fails and how to make it work again
Zhu, Z. (2010) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.2010.31 · Cited by 53
Customer trust recovery: An alternative explanation
Božić, B., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.002 · Cited by 52
Supervisory conversations on rigour and interpretive research
Whiteley, A. M. (2012) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.1108/14439881211248383 · Cited by 52
Theorising scenario analysis to improve future perspective planning in tourism
Moriarty, J. P. (2012) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2012.673619 · Cited by 51
Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H., & Burkemper, A. C. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0086 · Cited by 51
After the harvest: A stewardship perspective on entrepreneurship and philanthropy
Mathias, B. D., Solomon, S. J., & Madison, K. (2017) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.04.001 · Cited by 51
Emotions in organisation: an integral perspective
Kuepers, W. M., & Weibler, J. (2008) · International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion · doi:10.1504/ijwoe.2008.019426 · Cited by 50
Do we need one business model definition?
Jensen, A. B. (2014) · Journal of Business Models · doi:10.5278/ojs.jbm.v1i1.705 · Cited by 50
Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Berbagai Paradigma dalam Kajian Akuntansi
Brawijaya, U., & Djamhuri, A. (2011) · Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma · doi:10.18202/jamal.2011.04.7115 · Cited by 50
Strategische Netzwerke und Transaktionskosten
Sydow, J. (1992) · Managementforschung · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-86712-4_6 · Cited by 50
Guttormsen, D. S. A., Francesco, A. M., & Chapman, M. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2018.03.005 · Cited by 49
Games-as-a-Disservice: Emergent value co-destruction in platform business models
Lehtonen, M. J., Vesa, M. J., & Harviainen, J. T. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.055 · Cited by 49
Toward a Sport Ecosystem Logic
Buser, M., Woratschek, H., Dickson, G., & Schönberner, J. (2022) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2021-0056 · Cited by 49
Advancing value-based selling research in B2B markets: A theoretical toolbox and research agenda
Keränen, J., Totzek, D., Salonen, A., & Kienzler, M. (2023) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.02.014 · Cited by 49
Artificial intelligence for supplier scouting: an information processing theory approach
Guida, M., Caniato, F. F. A., Moretto, A. M., & Ronchi, S. (2023) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-12-2021-0536 · Cited by 49
Defining Learning in Educational Leadership: Reframing the Narrative
Myran, S., & Sutherland, I. E. (2018) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x18809338 · Cited by 49
Call for developing indigenous organisational theories in India: setting agenda for future
Panda, A., & Gupta, R. K. (2007) · International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management · doi:10.1504/ijicbm.2007.014478 · Cited by 49
Miranda, S. M., Berente, N., Seidel, S., Safadi, H., & Burton‐Jones, A. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2022/462e1 · Cited by 49
Youth Participatory Action Research: A Transformative Approach to Service-Learning.
Schensul, J. J., & Berg, M. J. (2004) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 48
Looking for a Few Good Concepts…and Theories…for
Markus, M. L., & Saunders, C. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 48
Božić, B., Siebert, S., & Martin, G. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.032 · Cited by 48
Teague, R., Provenza, F. D., Norton, B. E., Steffens, T. J., Barnes, M., Kothmann, M. M., & Roath, R. (2009) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · Cited by 48
Innovation adoption and diffusion in business-to-business marketing
Makkonen, H. S., & Johnston, W. J. (2014) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-08-2013-0163 · Cited by 47
Evaluating qualitative research in management accounting using the criteria of “convincingness”
Alsharari, N. M., & Al‐Shboul, M. (2019) · Pacific Accounting Review · doi:10.1108/par-03-2016-0031 · Cited by 47
Insights from systematic literature review of supply chain resilience and disruption
Agrawal, N. M., & Jain, R. K. (2021) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-02-2021-0084 · Cited by 47
A Sustainability Perspective on Flexible HRM: How to Cope with Paradoxes of Contingent Work
Kozica, A., & Kaiser, S. (2012) · management revue · doi:10.5771/0935-9915-2012-3-239 · Cited by 47
Rabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M., Kowalkowski, C., Baines, T. S., & Sousa, R. S. (2021) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-05-2021-840 · Cited by 47
Showcasing the diversity of service research: Theories, methods, and success of service articles
Benoit, S., Scherschel, K., Ates, Z., Nasr, L., & Kandampully, J. A. (2017) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2017-0102 · Cited by 46
Storberg‐Walker, J. (2006) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678860600616420 · Cited by 46
Interorganizational communication and ICT in construction projects: a review using metatriangulation
Adriaanse, A., & Voordijk, H. (2005) · Construction Innovation · doi:10.1108/14714170510815230 · Cited by 45
Wang, W., & Ko, N.-Y. (2012) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551512445240 · Cited by 45
Lachmann, M., Trapp, I., & Trapp, R. (2016) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2016.07.002 · Cited by 45
Multiparadigmatic Studies of Culture: Needs, Challenges, and Recommendations for Management Scholars
Patel, T. (2016) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12089 · Cited by 45
Learning with mobiles: The Global South
Traxler, J. M. (2018) · Research in Comparative and International Education · doi:10.1177/1745499918761509 · Cited by 45
Management processes in marketing planning
Greenley, G. E., Hooley, G., & Saunders, J. (2004) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560410539104 · Cited by 45
Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/105649269433002 · Cited by 45
Adaptive Enterprise Architecture for the Future: Towards a Reconceptualization of EA
Korhonen, J. J., Lapalme, J., McDavid, D., & Gill, A. Q. (2016) · IEEE Conference on Business Informatics · doi:10.1109/cbi.2016.38 · Cited by 44
In the Kingdom of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is King
Lowe, S. (2001) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/147059580113004 · Cited by 44
New paradigms for change? Theories of organization and the organization of theories
Collins, D. (1996) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534819610124025 · Cited by 44
Cilesiz, S., & Greckhamer, T. (2020) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120980047 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- HEC Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 584
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126321946
- Cited by
- 1,426
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- theory development, research paradigms, multi-paradigm approach, metaparadigm, organizational theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
