The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Autores como Mason (2018) sostienen que la creciente alineación entre identidades partidistas e identidades sociales intensifica la lógica de «nosotros frente a ellos», reforzando dinámicas de hostilidad afectiva y debilitando la deliberación pública.”
From Polarización política y afectiva en España: una revisión sistemática exploratoria (2026) · cites this paper as Mason (2018)
In the citing paper
“a) the grow-ing sorting of social identities and ideological positions within party groups, which reduces cross-cutting identities, increases intragroup homogeneity, and exacerbates the sensation of intergroup estrangement (Mason, 2018;Harteveld, 2021)”
From ¿Demasiado lejos? Cómo la polarización mal percibida alimenta la polarización afectiva en España (2025) · cites this paper as Mason, 2018
In the citing paper
“These observations about the ways in which different types of political polarization amplify others are consistent with social identity theory, which emphasizes the tendency for people to sort themselves into distinct groups that compete for symbolic and material resources88–92.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“Consequently, the correlation between partisanship and ideology has risen from roughly r = 0.4 in 1988 to r = 0.6 in 2012 (refs.47,91).”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“Group-justifying mechanisms, which are central to social identity theory88,90,91,94, involve group-serving tendencies to advance and maintain the interests and assumptions of the in-group against one or more out-groups (‘us versus them’).”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“Processes such as self-categorization, in-group favouritism and out-group derogation contribute to political polarization by encouraging partisans to engage in various forms of motivated reasoning — including selective information exposure or avoidance and confirmation or disconfirmation biases — on behalf of their political party or ideological group3,39,91,94,141–144.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“A growing body of research suggests that the American public has become more polarized over the past few decades (1, 2).”
From Troll and divide: the language of online polarization (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,006
Cleavage Formation in the 21st Century
Bornschier, S., Haffert, L., Häusermann, S., Steenbergen, M. R., & Zollinger, D. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009393508 · Cited by 88
Who’s at the Party? Group Sentiments, Knowledge, and Partisan Identity
Kane, J., Mason, L., & Wronski, J. (2021) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/715072 · Cited by 75
Self-citationPandemic Politics: The Deadly Toll of Partisanship in the Age of COVID
Callaghan, T. (2024) · Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law · doi:10.1215/03616878-11186119 · Cited by 77
Avoiding the Hypothetical: Why “Mirror Experiments” are an Essential Part of Survey Research
McDonald, J. A. (2019) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edz027 · Cited by 77
Hsiao, Y., & Radnitz, S. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1793848 · Cited by 76
“In this sense, protesting is similar to voting (Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundMoral Obstinacy in Political Negotiations
Delton, A. W., DeScioli, P., & Ryan, T. J. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12612 · Cited by 71
“Of course, another common cause of negotiation failure is polarized partisanship (Iyengar, Sood, & Lelkes, 2012; Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundDo Partisan Types Stop at the Water’s Edge?
Kertzer, J. D., Brooks, D. J., & Brooks, S. G. (2020) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/711408 · Cited by 74
You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling: How Gender Shapes Affective Polarization
Ondercin, H. L., & Lizotte, M. (2020) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x20972103 · Cited by 75
“Significantly for this project, partisanship shapes how we feel towards groups in the electorate, especially individuals with a different party label (Iyengar et al., 2012; Iyengar & Westwood, 2015; Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundDarr, J., Hitt, M. P., & Dunaway, J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108950930 · Cited by 76
What Goes with Red and Blue? Mapping Partisan and Ideological Associations in the Minds of Voters
Goggin, S. N., Henderson, J. A., & Theodoridis, A. G. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-09525-6 · Cited by 79
Warner, B. R., Colaner, C. W., & Park, J. (2020) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407520967438 · Cited by 85
“Given that politics is aligned with religious, social, cultural, racial, and economic identities, people have much at stake when they disagree (Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundTarrow, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009028905 · Cited by 101
Affective Polarization: Over Time, Through the Generations, and During the Lifespan
Phillips, J. (2022) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-022-09784-4 · Cited by 74
“An additive scale of strong partisanship, strong ideology, race, religion, and tea party membership, modeled after Mason (2018).”
InfluentialRoss, A. D., & Rouse, S. M. (2020) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09649-8 · Cited by 72
“1121 1 3 Political Behavior (2022) 44:1105–1124 In addition, contemporary research has acknowledged the importance of viewing partisanship as a social identity and testing its influence against other identities (Mason 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialGrand Old (Tailgate) Party? Partisan Discrimination in Apolitical Settings
Engelhardt, A., & Utych, S. (2018) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-09519-4 · Cited by 76
Marchal, N. (2021) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502211042516 · Cited by 94
“…shown to drive these effects (Frank & Gilovich, 1988), and scholars suggest that people can form identities around ideologies and opinion-based groups (Devine, 2015; Malka & Lelkes, 2010; Mason, 2018b) that are just as potent as partisanship in generating intergroup biases (McGarty et al., 2009).”
BackgroundPerry, S. L. (2023) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/07352751231153664 · Cited by 75
“…attitudes are becoming bimodal or moving toward extremes (Baldassari and Park 2020; Park 2018; Perry 2022), it is undeniable that Americans are becoming more asymmetrically “sorted” along ideological, racial, and partisan identities (Grossman and Hopkins 2016; Hacker and Pierson 2020; Mason 2018).”
BackgroundPartisanship, Religion, and Issue Polarization in the United States: A Reassessment
Castle, J. J., & Stepp, K. K. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09668-5 · Cited by 75
Bryan, J. D., & Tama, J. (2021) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/s41311-021-00348-7 · Cited by 74
“Most Democratic and Republican voters even now have cold feelings toward fellow citizens of the other party, reflecting affective polarization (Mason 2018; Iyengar et al.”
BackgroundLosing Common Ground: Social Sorting and Polarization
Mason, L. (2018) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2018-0004 · Cited by 82
Self-citationChoma, B. L., Hodson, G., Sumantry, D. M., Hanoch, Y., & Gummerum, M. (2021) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.5585 · Cited by 67
“The link between SDO and support for COVID-19 measures was stronger among Americans (vs. Canadians), perhaps attributable to the larger political divide in the US (Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundUsher, N. (2023) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2175399 · Cited by 76
“Despite concerns over growing (or perceived) political polarization (Mason, 2018), it remains unclear whether political polarization, particularly on the right, might be linked to the loss of local news.”
BackgroundDoes Climate Protest Work? Partisanship, Protest, and Sentiment Pools
Bugden, D. (2020) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023120925949 · Cited by 69
“This is consistent with recent work that has demonstrated powerfully that political party identification is a consequential social identity (Huddy, Mason, and Aarøe 2015; Iyengar and Westwood 2015; Mason 2018).”
BackgroundResultHostile Sexism, Racial Resentment, and Political Mobilization
Banda, K. K., & Cassese, E. C. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09674-7 · Cited by 68
Hopkins, D. J., & Noel, H. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421001416 · Cited by 64
“First published online: January 17, 2022. grounded in ideology and policy positions as opposed to partisanship and group affinity (Achen and Bartels 2017; Dawson 1995; Goggin and Theodoridis 2018; Iyengar et al. 2019; Kinder and Kalmoe 2017; Lee 2010; Mason 2018; Sniderman and Stiglitz 2012).”
BackgroundThe way we were: How histories of co‐governance alleviate partisan hostility
Horne, W., Adams, J., & Gidron, N. (2023) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140221100197 · Cited by 67
“…hostility and distrust, including economic conditions (Stewart et al., 2020), elite policy disputes (Rogowski & Sutherland., 2016), government performance (Reiljan, 2020), partisan media (Levendusky, 2013), and the overlap of citizens’ partisan and social identities (Harteveld, 2021b; Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundPopulism and the American Party System: Opportunities and Constraints
Lee, F. E. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592719002664 · Cited by 72
“A more populist party politics centered around racial and ethnic identity will likely deepen these challenges (Mason 2018) and thereby degrade the performance of American governing institutions.”
BackgroundThe Influence of Identity Salience on Framing Effectiveness: An Experiment
Diamond, E. P. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12669 · Cited by 69
Affective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings
Rudolph, T. J., & Hetherington, M. J. (2020) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa040 · Cited by 66
When Democracy Trumps Populism
Verbeek, J. A., Zaslove, A. S., Weyland, K., & Madrid, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108692793 · Cited by 70
Dorst, K. M. (2021) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-10469499 · Cited by 122
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Is the New Terrain for Political Division among Americans
Cowan, S. K., Mark, N. D. E., & Reich, J. A. (2021) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231211023657 · Cited by 65
Ahmed, A. (2023) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722001062 · Cited by 65
Political Polarization Affects Households' Financial Decisions: Evidence from Home Sales
McCartney, W. B., Orellana-Li, J., & Zhang, C. (2021) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13315 · Cited by 73
Polarization of Climate Change Beliefs: The Role of the Millennial Generation Identity
Ross, A. D., Rouse, S. M., & Mobley, W. H. (2019) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12640 · Cited by 70
Porter, E. V., & Wood, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108688338 · Cited by 112
Hidden Democracy: Political Dissent in Rural America
Duyn, E. V. (2018) · Journal of Communications · doi:10.1093/joc/jqy042 · Cited by 2
Are knowledgeable voters better voters?
Hannon, M. (2022) · Politics Philosophy & Economics · doi:10.1177/1470594x211065080 · Cited by 72
“This claim is backed up by decades of research in social identity theory (e.g. Green et al., 2002; Huddy, 2001; Kelly, 1988; Mason, 2018) and cognitive psychology (Ditto et al., 2009; Kunda, 1990; Lodge and Taber, 2013; Lord et al., 1979; Tavris and Aronson, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodSchaffner, B. F., Rhodes, J. H., & Raja, R. J. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108662550 · Cited by 61
Sequential Polarization: The Development of the Rural-Urban Political Divide, 1976–2020
Brown, T. E., & Mettler, S. B. (2023) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592723002918 · Cited by 64
“Particularly if political leaders evoke and organize such sentiments into politics, they may engender social polarization and “ us ” versus “ them ” politics (Abramowitz 2018; Mason 2018; McCoy and Somer 2019).”
The Acceptance and Expression of Prejudice during the Trump Era
Schaffner, B. F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108924153 · Cited by 60
The Social Consequences of Political Anger
Webster, S. W., Connors, E. C., & Sinclair, B. (2022) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/718979 · Cited by 72
The Development of the Urban-Rural Cleavage in Anglo-American Democracies
Taylor, Z., Lucas, J., Armstrong, D. A., II, & Bakker, R. (2023) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140231194060 · Cited by 61
“The divide is reinforced by the zero-sum nature of the two-party system, whereby partisanship assimilates highly correlated sets of opposing positions on a wide range of issues (Klein, 2020; Mason, 2018), and by elites ’ strategic activation of place-based issues and identities.”
BackgroundTribalism in America: Behavioral Experiments on Affective Polarization in the Trump Era
Whitt, S., Yanus, A. B., McDonald, B. J., Graeber, J., Setzler, M., Ballingrud, G., & Kifer, M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2020.29 · Cited by 63
“…polarization going back to Converse (1964) and revitalized most recently by Fiorina, Abrams, and Pope (2005), McCarty, Poole, and Rosenthal (2016), Hetherington and Weiler (2018), and Mason (2018) among others.1 We contribute to this discussion using evidence from recent behavioral experiments.”
BackgroundEnns, P. K., & Jardina, A. E. (2021) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfab040 · Cited by 59
Voters’ Partisan Responses to Politicians’ Immoral Behavior
Walter, A. S., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12582 · Cited by 58
“This is in line with the trend of negative partisanship in American politics (Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundResultMisinformation and Its Correction
Wittenberg, C., & Berinsky, A. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.009 · Cited by 64
Expressive Politics as (Costly) Norm Following
Pickup, M. A., Kimbrough, E. O., & de Rooij, E. A. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09667-6 · Cited by 55
“…behind costly political identity expression is valuable and timely, as it may elucidate the observation that individuals with different political identities have become more resistant to compromise over policy (Davis 2018), while policy differences have only increased marginally (Mason 2018a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNegative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship
Lee, A. H., Yphtach Lelkes, B., Hawkins, C. B., & Theodoridis, A. G. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0 · Cited by 57
Misperceptions about out-partisans’ democratic values may erode democracy
Pasek, M. H., Ankori-Karlinsky, L.-O., Levy-Vene, A., & Moore‐Berg, S. L. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19616-4 · Cited by 58
Which Party Represents My Group? The Group Foundations of Partisan Choice and Polarization
Claassen, R. L., Djupe, P. A., Lewis, A. R., & Neiheisel, J. R. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09565-6 · Cited by 58
“1960; Mason 2018), group-based perceptions are important mediators of political attachments.”
BackgroundDo Violent Protests Affect Expressions of Party Identity? Evidence from the Capitol Insurrection
Eady, G., Hjorth, F., & Dinesen, P. T. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422001058 · Cited by 55
“Often attributed to increases in political polarization (Iyengar et al. 2019; Mason 2018), the strength of partisanship is now so socially and politically consequential in the US that, in the words of a recent study, “it is difficult to overstate the importance of party loyalty” (Barber and Pope…”
BackgroundŞaşmaz, A., Yağcı, A. H., & Ziblatt, D. F. (2022) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140211066216 · Cited by 59
“In line with other recent work on voters and affective polarization (Mason, 2018; Svolik 2019; Iyengar et al., 2019; Nalepa et al., 2018), we document that among Turkey’s pro-government and opposition voters alike, it is those who feel more socially distant to the other side that are more…”
BackgroundResultThe AMLO Voter: Affective Polarization and the Rise of the Left in Mexico
Cornejo, R. C. (2022) · Journal of Politics in Latin America · doi:10.1177/1866802x221147067 · Cited by 62
“Moreover, the present study argues that López Obrador’s victory was driven by affective polarization (hypothesis 4) (Iyengar et al., 2012; Mason, 2018), which was exacerbated by his candidacy when relying on an “us against them” rhetoric, positioning himself against the political establishment.”
BackgroundWhite identity politics: linked fate and political participation
Berry, J., EBNER, D. B., & Cornelius, M. (2019) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2019.1615965 · Cited by 54
“Given that our study focuses on electoral behavior during a period of extreme partisan polarization among elites (McCarty, Poole, and Rosenthal 2016) and the public (Mason 2018), it is important to consider the relationship between race and partisanship for White Americans.”
BackgroundClose to Home: Place-Based Mobilization in Racialized Contexts
Nuamah, S. A. A., & Ogorzalek, T. K. (2021) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421000307 · Cited by 53
“…and perhaps immovable partisan and ideological positions also impede clear-eyed policy evaluation, as voters choose sides and retrospectively justify positions and/or misjudge the performance of their favored and disfavored political actors (e.g., Green, Palmquist, and Schickler 2002; Mason 2018).”
BackgroundPolarization and US foreign policy: key debates and new findings
Friedrichs, G. M., & Tama, J. (2022) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/s41311-022-00381-0 · Cited by 66
“Affective polarization, or negative partisanship, refers to sharpening feelings of animosity between people of different political persuasions (Abramowitz and Webster 2016; Mason 2018; Iyengar et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInside a White Power echo chamber: Why fringe digital spaces are polarizing politics
Törnberg, P., & Törnberg, A. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221122915 · Cited by 60
“This contemporary polarization has been referred to as affective (Iyengar et al., 2012), sectarian (Finkel et al., 2020), or social polarization (Mason, 2018), meaning that it is driven by deeply rooted mechanisms of group affiliation in human psychology (Iyengar et al., 2019).”
Toxic Speech and Limited Demand for Content Moderation on Social Media
Pradel, F., Zilinsky, J., Kosmidis, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305542300134x · Cited by 33
“…theoretical arguments anticipate that toxicity offers a powerful way to differentiate ingroups from outgroups (Druckman et al. 2019; Gervais 2015; Mason 2018), we exposed participants to different scenarios where they see toxic speech directed at either people of different socioeconomic,…”
Maine ranked-choice voting as a case of electoral-system change
Santucci, J. (2018) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344893.2018.1502208 · Cited by 52
“One is a historically high level of between-party polarisation, now so pronounced that scholars can detect it in mass-level affect toward the opposing party (Mason 2018).”
BackgroundPolarized Networks? New Evidence on American Voters’ Political Discussion Networks
Butters, R., & Hare, C. (2020) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09647-w · Cited by 40
“If the composition of discussion networks indeed shapes political out-group perceptions, then network homophily likely serves as a key mechanism driving trends in affective polarization (Mason 2018; Enders and Armaly 2019).”
BackgroundUnderstanding Rural Identities and Environmental Policy Attitudes in America
Diamond, E. P. (2021) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721002231 · Cited by 56
“Social identities are becoming increasingly relevant in modern American politics as drivers of political attitudes and behaviors (Green, Palmquist, and Schickler 2002; Huddy 2001; Mason 2018).”
BackgroundSecessionist conflict and affective polarization: Evidence from Catalonia
Balcells, L., & Kuo, A. G. (2022) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/00223433221088112 · Cited by 51
“For example, Mason (2018) shows that US identity-based partisan polarization has increased because of the greater sorting of various identity groups into partisan groups and the corresponding decline of cross-cutting identities.”
BackgroundResultReducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform
Combs, A., Tierney, G., Guay, B., Merhout, F., Bail, C. A., Hillygus, D. S., & Volfovsky, A. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01655-0 · Cited by 62
“These sub-conditions were meant to provide further insight about how information on partisan identity might shape anonymous conversations about politics 8,22,46,48 .”
BackgroundLee, A. H. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1799124 · Cited by 49
The emergence and perils of polarization
Baldassarri, D., & Page, S. E. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116863118 · Cited by 50
Morbid Polarization: Exposure to COVID‐19 and Partisan Disagreement about Pandemic Response
Rodriguez, C. G., Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2022) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12810 · Cited by 62
“This is consistent with the experience of the pandemic: the United States entered the summer months, most states dropped COVID emergency orders and reopened their economies, meaning that the salience of the pandemic declined for many Americans.”
BackgroundInfluentialPeterson, E., & Kagalwala, A. (2021) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420001124 · Cited by 49
Wojcieszak, M., Winter, S., & Yu, X. (2020) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2020.1714663 · Cited by 47
“In contemporary America, it is one’s partisan group that is central to one’s political identity and shapes other attitudes, cognitions, and behaviors (Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundFilindra, A., Kaplan, N. J., & Büyüker, B. (2020) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/soin.12388 · Cited by 46
Man Bites Blue Dog: Are Moderates Really More Electable than Ideologues?
Utych, S. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/706054 · Cited by 49
Hopkins, D. J., Kaiser, C. R., Pérez, E. O., Hagá, S., Ramos, C., & Zárate, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2019.14 · Cited by 49
“To be sure, political partisanship is a social identity that is likely to be durable, meaning that it would be surprising if we did find that it responded to a single article or statement (Green, Palmquist, and Schickler 2002; Mason 2018).”
BackgroundWojcieszak, M., Thakur, A., Gonçalves, J. F. F., Casas, A., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Boon, M. (2021) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmab006 · Cited by 60
“Inasmuch as partisanship and ideology are increasingly aligned with other core social identities (Mason, 2018), the possibilities of reaching individuals with dissimilar views may be limited.”
BackgroundThe interplay of social identity and norm psychology in the evolution of human groups
Bar-On, K. K., & Lamm, E. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0412 · Cited by 62
The Kids Are Online: Teen Social Media Use, Civic Engagement, and Affective Polarization
Oden, A., & Porter, L. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231186364 · Cited by 71
“…as a major threat to US democracy (Draughton, 2022; Kingzette et al., 2021), but as politics become more intertwined with our social identities (Mason, 2018; McCoy & Somer, 2019), a process that is likely compounded through the personalization of the internet (Liu, 2012), polarization among…”
BackgroundFactors Influencing Voting Decision: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Kulachai, W., Lerdtomornsakul, U., & Homyamyen, P. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12090469 · Cited by 97
Democracy and the Epistemic Problems of Political Polarization
Benson, J. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423001089 · Cited by 64
“Mason (2018) has elsewhere referred to this alignment as the formation of “ mega-identities, ” but the discussion here allows us to also see it as the formation of mega-perspectives.”
BackgroundLevendusky, M. S., & Stecula, D. A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009042192 · Cited by 56
The Origins and Consequences of Racialized Schemas about U.S. Parties
Zhirkov, K., & Valentino, N. A. (2022) · The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2022.4 · Cited by 49
“Optimists hoped the election of Obama, the nation ’ s first African American president, would improve race relations in the United States.”
InfluentialWojcieszak, M. (2019) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650219844868 · Cited by 56
“Like-minded sources are perceived as more credible (Metzger et al., 2015), Wojcieszak 691 and political attitudes could be linked with social identity (Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundDemocracy by Deterrence: Norms, Constitutions, and Electoral Tilting
Helmke, G., Kroeger, M., & Paine, J. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12668 · Cited by 45
Rogers, N., & Jones, J. J. (2021) · Journal of Social Computing · doi:10.23919/jsc.2021.0002 · Cited by 47
The Democracy of Dating: How Political Affiliations Shape Relationship Formation
Easton, M. J., & Holbein, J. B. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2020.21 · Cited by 50
“Political animosity has increasingly taken center-stage in US politics (Mason 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialBusby, E. C., Howat, A. J., Rothschild, J. E., & Shafranek, R. M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009086462 · Cited by 48
Garzia, D., & da Silva, F. F. (2022) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x221074633 · Cited by 50
Patriotism and Nationalism, Left and Right: A Q‐Methodology Study of American National Identity
Hanson, K., & O'Dwyer, E. J. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12561 · Cited by 45
Kozlowski, A. C. (2021) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soab020 · Cited by 48
“Recent scholarship suggests that selfplacement on the ideological spectrum cannot be interpreted as a simple indicator of the respondent’s belief system, but is better conceived as a statement of affinity with a political identity (Devine 2015; Malka and Lelkes 2010; Mason 2018a, 2018b).”
BackgroundMy kind of people: Political polarization, ideology, and firm location
Barber, B., & Blake, D. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3572 · Cited by 45
Antisemitic Attitudes Across the Ideological Spectrum
Hersh, E. D., & Royden, L. (2022) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129221111081 · Cited by 45
“In the framework of social identity theory, Jews could be perceived as an out-group on both the left and right, and each extremist group would focus on negative aspects of this shared out-group in order to raise their group esteem (Tajfel et al. 1971; Mason 2018; Klar, Krupnikov and Ryan 2018).”
BackgroundCOVID-19 Spillover Effects onto General Vaccine Attitudes
Trujillo, K. L., Green, J., Safarpour, A., Lazer, D. M. J., Lin, J. A.-J., & Motta, M. (2024) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfad059 · Cited by 53
How partisanship and sexism influence voters’ reactions to political #MeToo scandals
Costa, M., Briggs, T., Chahal, A., Fried, J., Garg, R., Kriz, S., Lei, L. H.-I., Milne, A., & Slayton, J. (2020) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168020941727 · Cited by 44
“Considering the intense emotional attachments that drive affective polarization (Iyengar et al., 2012; Mason, 2018), partisanship is a strong source of directional motivated reasoning (Druckman et al., 2013; Green et al., 2002; Sigel, 1964).”
BackgroundYu, X., Wojcieszak, M., & Casas, A. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-022-09850-x · Cited by 66
Chan, N. K. M., & Jasso, F. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09750-6 · Cited by 48
Clemons, J. (2022) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722001074 · Cited by 46
“…working white people as irredeemably racist — captured by the racist ideologies that the Republican Party, in particular (though by no means exclusively) has relied upon to build electoral coalitions in the “ post-Civil Rights Era ” (Haney-Lopez 2014; Mason 2018; Sides, Tesler, and Vavreck 2019).”
Barton-Hronešová, J., & Kreiss, D. (2024) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592724000239 · Cited by 56
“…divide in perceptions of antiwhite bias in the United States: hijacked victimhood claims are part of a Republican Party political strategy that maps onto its predominantly white and white Christian coalition identity (Mason 2018), reinforced by Barack Obama ’ s election since 2008 (Samuels 2022).”
BackgroundMessaging Mask Wearing During the COVID-19 Crisis: Ideological Differences
Utych, S. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2020.15 · Cited by 43
“Americans are deeply polarized along partisan and ideological lines (Mason, 2018), and this effect extends to response to the COVID-19 crisis.”
BackgroundMemes, scenes and #ELXN2019s: How partisans make memes during elections
McKelvey, F. R., DeJong, S., & Frenzel, J. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211020690 · Cited by 47
Myrick, R. (2022) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/s41311-022-00382-z · Cited by 43
“Scholars point to internet penetration and partisan media (Lelkes et al. 2015), ideological polarization among elites (Webster and Abramow-itz 2017), and the decline of ‘cross-cutting’ social identities (Mason 2015, 2018) as explanations for the rise in affective polarization in the United States.”
BackgroundMorris, R. C., & LeCount, R. J. (2020) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0731121419899387 · Cited by 45
“Regardless, rather than treat these domains as conceptually separate we combine them here to further work being done investigating areas of overlap (cf. Mason 2018).”
BackgroundSatherley, N., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12414 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, L.
- Corresponding author
- Mason, Lilliana
- ORCID
- Mason, Lilliana
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W4241842642
- Cited by
- 1,985
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 347 · 2025: 315 · 2024: 238 · 2023: 202 · 2022: 220 · 2021: 226 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 158 · 2018: 50
- FWCI
- 200.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal principles and applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review