The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Autores como Mason (2018) sostienen que la creciente alineación entre identidades partidistas e identidades sociales intensifica la lógica de «nosotros frente a ellos», reforzando dinámicas de hostilidad afectiva y debilitando la deliberación pública.”
From Polarización política y afectiva en España: una revisión sistemática exploratoria (2026) · cites this paper as Mason (2018)
In the citing paper
“a) the grow-ing sorting of social identities and ideological positions within party groups, which reduces cross-cutting identities, increases intragroup homogeneity, and exacerbates the sensation of intergroup estrangement (Mason, 2018;Harteveld, 2021)”
From ¿Demasiado lejos? Cómo la polarización mal percibida alimenta la polarización afectiva en España (2025) · cites this paper as Mason, 2018
In the citing paper
“These observations about the ways in which different types of political polarization amplify others are consistent with social identity theory, which emphasizes the tendency for people to sort themselves into distinct groups that compete for symbolic and material resources88–92.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“Consequently, the correlation between partisanship and ideology has risen from roughly r = 0.4 in 1988 to r = 0.6 in 2012 (refs.47,91).”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“Group-justifying mechanisms, which are central to social identity theory88,90,91,94, involve group-serving tendencies to advance and maintain the interests and assumptions of the in-group against one or more out-groups (‘us versus them’).”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“Processes such as self-categorization, in-group favouritism and out-group derogation contribute to political polarization by encouraging partisans to engage in various forms of motivated reasoning — including selective information exposure or avoidance and confirmation or disconfirmation biases — on behalf of their political party or ideological group3,39,91,94,141–144.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“A growing body of research suggests that the American public has become more polarized over the past few decades (1, 2).”
From Troll and divide: the language of online polarization (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,006
Partisan Alignment Increases Voter Turnout: Evidence from Redistricting
Fraga, B. L., Moskowitz, D., & Schneer, B. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09685-y · Cited by 6
“As affective polarization increases and the electorate increasingly views democracy as a clash of identities (Mason 2018; Iyengar et al.”
BackgroundAssessing the Russian Troll Efforts to Sow Discord on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. Election
Rains, S. A., Shmargad, Y., Coe, K., et al. (2021) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqab009 · Cited by 5
Luo, Z. (2021) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.2021272 · Cited by 5
“American society today is polarized (Mason, 2018).”
Politicultural Sorting: Mapping Ideological Differences in American Leisure and Consumption
Rogers, N. (2022) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x211041143 · Cited by 8
“As Mason (2018) writes, “The more (politicultural) divisions there are, and the less organized those groups are around any one division, the more peaceful and cooperative a society can be.””
BackgroundPartisan discrimination without explicit partisan cues
Lyons, J., & Utych, S. (2022) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.6491 · Cited by 6
“Partisanship has become a durable social identity (Huddy, Mason, & Aarøe, 2015; Iyengar & Westwood, 2015), helping to spur affective polarization (Iyengar, Sood, & Lelkes, 2012; Mason, 2015, 2018a), and negative partisanship (Abramowitz & Webster, 2016).”
BackgroundThere must be a villain: political threats, narrative thought, and political violence
McLaughlin, B., Dunn, J. A., Velez, J. A., & Hunter, J. A. (2022) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2022.2109978 · Cited by 6
“As the political climate in the U.S. becomes increasingly hostile, scholars have largely examined polarization through the lens of social identity theory and/or biased cognitive processing (e.g., Iyengar, Sood, & Lelkes, 2012; Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundMotivations underlying Latino Americans’ group-based social media engagement
Saleem, M., Mastro, D. E., & Docherty, M. (2023) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqad013 · Cited by 5
Hallin, D. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108886260.004 · Cited by 6
Alexandre, C., Gonthier, F., & Guerra, T. (2021) · French Politics · doi:10.1057/s41253-020-00143-5 · Cited by 5
“On the one side, these issues are often more salient in the public debate due to an ambient discourse that is more polarized (Baldassarri and Park 2020; Mason 2018).”
BackgroundPolicy or Partisanship in the United Kingdom? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from BrexitPreprint
Schonfeld, B., & Winter-Levy, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3373348 · Cited by 5
Compound Political Identity: How Partisan and Racial Identities Overlap and ReinforcePreprint
Westwood, S. J., & Peterson, E. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3417476 · Cited by 6
Democracy and “the Other”: Anti-Immigrant Attitudes and White Support for Anti-Democratic NormsPreprint
Büyüker, B., & Filindra, A. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3585387 · Cited by 5
The Surprising Stability of Asian Americans' and Latinos' Partisan Identities in the Early Trump EraPreprint
Hopkins, D. J., Kaiser, C. R., & Pérez, E. O. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3840922 · Cited by 5
Political segregation in the US workplacePreprint
Frake, J., Hurst, R., & Kagan, M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4639165 · Cited by 5
Combs, A., Tierney, G., Guay, B., Merhout, F., Bail, C. A., Hillygus, D. S., & Volfovsky, A. (2022) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/cwgu5 · Cited by 5
Peer income exposure across the income distribution
Spiegel, M., Clark, L. R., Domina, T., Penner, E. K., Hanselman, P., Yoo, P. Y., & Penner, A. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2410349122 · Cited by 6
Kollberg, M., & Bantel, I. (2025) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2025.2531711 · Cited by 5
“In the political real, affective polarisation can make it more difficult to find compromises, fuel civil disagreement (Mason 2015, 2018) and ultimately undermine the functioning of democracy and pluralist norms (Levitsky and Ziblatt 2018; McCoy et al .”
Toward a group theory of political communication
Coles, S. M., Kreiss, D., Lane, D. S., & McGregor, S. C. (2025) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaf049 · Cited by 6
Grant, D., Jorgenson, A. K., Longhofer, W., & Vasi, I. B. (. (2025) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224251396518 · Cited by 4
“…shift,” or inclination to exaggerate the maliciousness and power of opponents (Sabatier et al. 1987), parallels the argument of affective polarization scholars who contend that identity-based sorting has largely replaced issue-based sorting as a divisive force in modern democracies (Mason 2018).”
Okeke, D. E., Boateng, M. A., Okpala, C. P., Ibiwoye, C., Okeke, A., Mbaye, O., & Obah, I. E. (2026) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393261426534 · Cited by 4
VRscores: A New Measure and Data Set of Workforce Politics Using Voter Registrations
Kagan, M., Frake, J., & Hurst, R. (2026) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2025.20402 · Cited by 8
A House Divided: Donald Trump and the Transformation of American Politics
Cruz, S. C. V. E. (2021) · Contributions to international relations · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87914-3_8 · Cited by 4
Merolla, J. L., Nemerever, Z., Lockhart, M., Kousser, T. B., Romero, M., & Hill, S. J. (2022) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12876 · Cited by 4
“A long line of scholarship has argued and found that individuals use partisanship to process incoming information, form attitudes, and guide evaluations of political objects (Campbell et al., 1960; Zaller, 1992), and this has only intensified in an era of high polarization (Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundA tug of war: how voters balance ideology and ethnocentrism
Allen, L. G., & Lindsay, S. C. (2023) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2023.2207258 · Cited by 4
“” And as recent fi ndings by Halliez and Thorton (2021, 259) show, this ’ nonideological ’ use of ideological labels “ has important consequences, ” such that ideology is conceptualized more as a social identity (Devine 2015; Mason 2018) rather than a consistent set of policy preferences.”
BackgroundLi, Y., Wang, Z., & Li, Q. (2023) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqad025 · Cited by 4
The uses of the term polarisation in Swedish newspapers, 2010–2021
Farjam, M., Bruhn, T., Gustafsson, N., & Segesten, A. D. (2024) · Nordicom review/NORDICOM review · doi:10.2478/nor-2024-0002 · Cited by 6
The Increasing Nationalization of Local Elections: The Case of Prosecutors
Carson, J. L., Cann, D. M., Yates, J. L., et al. (2024) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129241256604 · Cited by 4
“Today, elections are likely to be nationalized not because of the current electoral system as much as by the types of campaigns coordinated by the national parties and the increasing number of individuals who view politics as part of their individual identity (Klein 2020; Mason 2018).”
The development of attitudes toward science and technology: a longitudinal analysis of Generation X
Miller, J. D., Laspra, B., Polino, C., et al. (2024) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scae051 · Cited by 4
School Board Elections Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
Jacob, B. A. (2024) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584241291029 · Cited by 4
“A well-established body of literature in political science suggests that identity issues drive political engagement and preferences more than substantive policy preferences (Huddy et al., 2015; Iyengar et al., 2012; Mason, 2018).”
Democratic Backsliding and Ethnic Politics: The Republican Party in the United States
Lieberman, R. C., & Schlozman, D. (2024) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140241302714 · Cited by 6
“This polarization has been reinforced by the ongoing social and geographical sorting of Americans (Mason, 2018; Tesler, 2016).”
InfluentialImproving debriefing practices for participants in social science experiments
Clayton, K., Porter, E. V., Velez, Y. R., & Wood, T. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae502 · Cited by 4
When the players make you hate the game: affective polarization and electoral confidence
Gibson, N. S. (2024) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2024.2443681 · Cited by 4
“With the two parties so clearly defined politically and socially, it has become easier for elites to craft highly effective messages evoking social identities (Mason 2018; Sinclair 2012).”
Real or Imagined? American Urban-Rural Differences in Political Values
Trujillo, K. L., & Lin, J. A.-J. (2025) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129251324464 · Cited by 5
“Due to increasing polarization (Abramowitz 2010; Mason 2018; McCarty, Poole, and Rosenthal, 2016), liberals and conservatives in the United States have become divided on the values that are previously observed to divide countries based on a collectivist or individualistic orientation (Graham,…”
Polarización visual: el papel de Instagram en la formación de identidades colectivas.
Marcos-García, S., Medina, R. Z., & Egea-Barquero, M. (2025) · Revista ICONO14 · doi:10.7195/ri14.v23i1.2226 · Cited by 6
“A pesar de la dificultad para identificar el origen de la polarización afectiva, di-versos estudios destacan el auge del populismo como uno de los principales factores detrás de su crecimiento en las sociedades contemporáneas (Pappas, 2019; Mason, 2018; McCoy & Somer, 2018).”
Religious Freedom Backlash: Evidence from Public Opinion Experiments about Free Expression
Lewis, A. R., & McDaniel, E. L. (2023) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096522001251 · Cited by 4
“Because the meaning of religious freedom has been sorted into partisan camps—and because partisan identity is so potent to understanding politics and religion (Margolis 2018; Mason 2018)—we expected these effects to be filtered through partisanship for many.”
BackgroundMotta, M. (2023) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2023.2168678 · Cited by 4
“As identi fi - cation with the two parties in Washington have become increasingly-central components of Americans ’ social identities (Mason 2018; West and Iyengar 2020), the public has come to let their partisan group a ffi liations govern the sources of political information that they fi nd…”
BackgroundZhu, X., Caliskan, C., Christenson, D. P., Spiliopoulos, K., Walker, D., & Kolaczyk, E. D. (2023) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1093/jrsssa/qnad008 · Cited by 7
Parliamentary candidates and their campaign messages at the 2019 General Election
Trumm, S., Milazzo, C., & Duggan, A. (2023) · Politics · doi:10.1177/02633957231186384 · Cited by 4
“…the growing importance of affective polarisation in influencing the political choices of some voters (e.g. Hobolt et al., 2021; Politics 45(2) Kalla and Broockman, 2018; Mason, 2018), what happens during the campaign period can play an important role in determining how voters cast their ballot.”
Porter, R., Treul, S. A., & McDonald, M. (2023) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/726928 · Cited by 4
Algara, C., & Hale, I. (2023) · The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2023.16 · Cited by 4
“…not to appeal to their racial conservatism and appeals by Republican politicians are likely to be dulled in effectiveness by the cross-pressuring forces of partisanship — much as individuals with cross-pressuring group identities are less likely to be politically engaged (Mason 2016, 2018).”
BackgroundKann, C. K., Ebanks, D., Morrier, J., & Alvarez, R. M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294047 · Cited by 7
Black Lives Matter and Partisan Media
Kim, S., Kotva, Z. R., Zain, A., & Chen, Y. (2024) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia5010006 · Cited by 4
The effects of party labels on vote choice with realistic candidate differentiation
Titelman, N., & Lauderdale, B. E. (2024) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2024.20 · Cited by 4
“As Mason (2018) affirms, this view would imply that “ citizens do not choose which party to support based on policy opinion ” (p.20).”
Communicating for Sustainability in the Digital Age: Toward a New Paradigm of Literacy
Ott, B. L. (2024) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe15020029 · Cited by 5
Religious Polarization in Europe
Wilkins‐Laflamme, S., Voas, D., & Hewlett, K. (2024) · Sociology of Religion · doi:10.1093/socrel/srae017 · Cited by 7
In-party love spreads more efficiently than out-party hate in online communities
Martín-Gutíerrez, S., Robles, J. M., Torcal, M., Losada, J. C., & Benito, R. M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-65688-9 · Cited by 9
Partisanship, Race, and Public Opinion on Redistricting: The Case of South Carolina
Cooper, C. A., Huffmon, S. H., Knotts, H. G., & McKee, S. C. (2024) · Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy · doi:10.1089/elj.2023.0048 · Cited by 4
“At the same time, modern American politics is besieged by partisanship such that political identity competes with and perhaps even surpasses all other identities in terms of its importance (Mason, 2018).”
Macková, A., Smejkal, K., Jansová, I., et al. (2024) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2024.2387780 · Cited by 4
“As the polarization stems from animosity driven by distinctions between social identities and groups (Mason 2018; Shanto, Yphtach, and Matthew et al. 2019), it is necessarily connected to social distance and stereotypes about “them,” hostility and discrimination toward political opponents and to…”
Partisans process policy-based and identity-based messages using dissociable neural systems
Jacoby, N., Landau-Wells, M., Pearl, J., Paul, A., Falk, E. B., Bruneau, E., & Ochsner, K. N. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae368 · Cited by 5
Griffin, L. H. (2024) · Journal of Media and Religion · doi:10.1080/15348423.2024.2408970 · Cited by 5
“Recent research suggests that affective polarization is driven primarily by feelings of threat (Mason, 2016, 2018), and Trad Instagram positions “orthodoxy as the only rebellion left” against mainstream society (June 29, 2020, Figure 3).”
Brown, G. D. A., & Walasek, L. (2025) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12787 · Cited by 4
“The literature on motivated beliefs, and in particular the role of political partisanship, is large and we do not review it here (see, e.g., Kahan, 2015b; Kunda, 1987, 1990; Mason, 2018; Stanovich, 2021; Taber & Lodge, 2006).”
Victimhood, partisan identities, and media consumption in the US
Mayer, A., & Parks, P. (2025) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2025.2460508 · Cited by 4
“Partisanship is typically conceptualized as a group or social identity (Greene 2004; 1999; Mason 2018b).”
Party Over Principles: Determinants of Public Opinion on Redistricting Reform
McLaughlin, P. T. (2025) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1017/spq.2024.34 · Cited by 4
Not My Problem: How Social Identity Shapes Problem Perceptions and Policy Attitudes
Moniz, P. (2025) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129251321497 · Cited by 5
“Social identities seem to play an increasingly large role in mass politics in the United States, due in part to more and more people from the same social groups identifying with the same political parties (Levendusky, 2009; Mason, 2018).”
Partisanship and Trust in Personal Doctors: Causes and Consequences
O'Brian, N., & Kent, T. B. (2025) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123424000607 · Cited by 4
“…salience in partisan political debates and an existing scholarship which documents that partisanship has become a core identity to many Americans (for example, Mason 2018; Iyengar, Sood and Lelkes 2012), we investigate whether people consider a doctor ’ s partisanship as a factor for seeking care.”
The Political Power of Negative Motivations
Goodliffe, J., Magleby, D. B., & Scanlan, J. (2025) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-025-10016-8 · Cited by 4
“Polarization has been steadily growing over the last forty years in the US (Abramowitz and Saunders 2008, 548; Malka and Lelkes 2010, 182; Jacobson 2012, 1625; Campbell 2018, 29–30; Mason 2018a, 876; Abramowitz 2019, 164).”
Urban–rural policy disagreement
Borwein, S., Lucas, J., Romualdi, T., Taylor, Z., Armstrong, D., & McCoy, K. (2025) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.70009 · Cited by 12
“Contemporary political polarization is thought to be particularly potent, in part, because it is reinforced by – and in turn, reinforces – other social identities (Iyengar et al., 2012; Mason, 2018).”
Perry, S. L., Shortle, A. F., McDaniel, E. L., & Grubbs, J. B. (2025) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfaf009 · Cited by 6
“Unlike Americans on the right who are increasingly unified in partisan, ideological, religious, and racial identities (Mason 2018; Perry 2023), Americans on the left must not only work through challenges associated with greater racial diversity, but include groups of Americans who are dog-matically…”
The crisis of design in American government
Roberts, A. S. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/23276665.2025.2521793 · Cited by 4
“The two-party system encourages Americans to see politics as a Manichean struggle (Mason, 2018).”
“Funny Weapons”: The Norms of Humour in the Construction of Far‐Right Political Polarisation
Toscano, G. B., & Villanueva, C. F. (2025) · Social Inclusion · doi:10.17645/si.10211 · Cited by 4
Perceptions of elites and (asymmetric) sorting
Davis, N. T. (2018) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168018777099 · Cited by 4
How Do Policy Organizations Frame Issues and Shape Identity? Exploring the Case of School Choice
Brown, H. (2019) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399719884735 · Cited by 4
“…families from collective public schools into the home or from relying on police services to protecting one’s home with a firearm—newly formed or strengthened social identities may develop in the same isolated way Lilliana Mason (2018) has described as social polarization (Joslyn et al., 2017).”
BackgroundDebate Reaction Ideal Points: Political Ideology Measurement Using Real-Time Reaction Data
Argyle, D., Argyle, L. P., Eidelman, V., & Resnik, P. (2021) · Statistics Politics and Policy · doi:10.1515/spp-2020-0012 · Cited by 6
Illés, G., & Körösényi, A. (2021) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/s41296-021-00525-6 · Cited by 7
“…of representation (cf. Laclau and Mouffe’s notion of ‘constitutive outside’ – Mouffe, 2000), and by the empirical research results of social psychology: the emergence of an identity-group (an ingroup) is accompanied by the appearance of an outgroup (Mason, 2015; 2018; Achen and Bartels, 2017).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPartisans Hear, but They Don’t Listen: Testing the Limits of Partisanship in Risky Decision Making
Swigger, N., Buelow, M. T., Wirth, J. H., & Okdie, B. M. (2022) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x221081252 · Cited by 3
“Much of this polarization can be traced to the way that other forms of social identity like race and religion have aligned with partisan identity (Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundLivestreaming Election Day: Political Memory and Identity Work at Susan B. Anthony’s Gravesite
Butkowski, C. P. (2022) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051221086236 · Cited by 4
“In turn, social media also contribute to bridging the gap between citizens’ personal and political lives by furnishing tools and spaces for networked political discourse and identification (Bennett, 2012; Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundWhite Constituents and Congressional Voting
Hansen, E. R. (2022) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x221087159 · Cited by 4
Stable Views in a Time of Tumult: Assessing Trends in American Public Opinion, 2007-2020
Hopkins, D. J. (2021) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123422000254 · Cited by 7
“The 2017 – 21 Trump presidency took place after decades of sorting and political polarization by citizens (Levendusky 2009; Mason 2018), and is the product of a combination of causes operating at multiple levels of the political system (Sides, Tesler, and Vavreck 2019).”
BackgroundPolitical Communication as a Tragedy of the Commons
Farrer, B. D. (2022) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217221138414 · Cited by 6
“That is, many researchers show that “the base” are generally more extreme than “the moderates” (Downs, 1957; Levendusky, 2013; Mason, 2018), and so political organizations may communicate with them more, and in more extreme ways.”
BackgroundInfluentialMacková, A., Novotná, M., Čejková, L., & Hrbková, L. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2202650 · Cited by 7
“In the U.S., Democrats increasingly like the Democratic Party, and Democratic voters increasingly dislike the rival Republican party and its voters, and vice versa (Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundCompliance with Public Health Orders: The Role of Trust, Representation, and Expertise
Stauffer, K. E., Miller, S. M., & Keiser, L. R. (2023) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129231182375 · Cited by 4
“Partisanship, under certain conditions, is internalized as a social identity — as a part of an individual ’ s concept of self (West and Iyengar 2020; Mason 2018).”
BackgroundIntraparty Republican Factionalism as Identity in the Modern American South
Cooper, C. A., Huffmon, S. H., Knotts, H. G., et al. (2023) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x231206140 · Cited by 4
“Partisan attachments can form an important part of a person ’ s social identity (Green et al., 2002; Mason, 2018).”
BackgroundSimon, J., & Sonnicksen, J. (2024) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00527-6 · Cited by 4
Gender, Sexism, and Contempt in Candidate Evaluation
Ditonto, T., & Mattes, K. (2024) · Journal of Women Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2024.2300934 · Cited by 6
“Finally, due to high levels of partisan polarization and animosity (e.g., Mason 2018), we expect that women running in a voter’s out-party will be seen as particularly contemptible, especially to strong partisans.”
Weyland, K., & Madrid, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108692793.002 · Cited by 5
How education did (and did not) accentuate partisan differences during the Ebola outbreak of 2014-15
Martin, C. C. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1072 · Cited by 4
“In the current era, party identification and political ideology have become anchors for social identity (Cohen, 2003; Mason, 2018), and thus motivated reasoning should be particularly strong for politicized issues.”
BackgroundHaas, I. J. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1721234 · Cited by 4
“They argue that the current Republican Party appeals to abstract conservative values, while the Democratic Party focuses more on concrete policy change that appeals to a broad coalition of different liberal groups.”
BackgroundInfluentialWho Wants to Know? White Racial Attitudes and Survey Item Refusal on Gun Ownership Questions
LeCount, R. J. (2021) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/soin.12444 · Cited by 4
Bréchon, P., Gonthier, F., & Astor, S. (2019) · Presses universitaires de Grenoble eBooks · doi:10.3917/pug.brech.2019.01.0363 · Cited by 4
Clark, J. R., & Lee, D. R. (2018) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies6030051 · Cited by 4
Just a Big Misunderstanding? Bias and Bayesian Affective PolarizationPreprint
Stone, D. F. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2760069 · Cited by 4
“In order to see what happens asymptotically, rather than analyze how the players update with the signals one at a time, it is easier to consider updating based on the mean of the 15 See Ross et al. (1977) for early work from psychology and Butler et al. (2015) for a recent application from economics.”
BackgroundInfluentialYue, L. Q., & Wang, J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4405975 · Cited by 4
Bishin, B. G., & Muttram, H. (2023) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2023-2026 · Cited by 4
The Ideological Asymmetry of White Identity
Townsend, K., Eyre, K., Walker, H., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/732974 · Cited by 3
The economic divide that isn’t: A comparative study on economic hardship and affective polarisation
Vanagt, J., & Russo, L. (2024) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680241292410 · Cited by 3
“After more than a decade of research, consensus has been reached on the most important causes of affective polarisation: group attachment (e.g. Harteveld, 2021b; Mason, 2018) and ideology (e.g. Algara and Zur, 2023; Harteveld, 2021a).”
Grady, A. R., & Lewis, J. A. (2024) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-024-00308-1 · Cited by 3
Mellon, G. (2025) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224251346993 · Cited by 4
“The continuation of this trend has implications for the quality of local educational services and the health of local democratic governance in the United States.”
InfluentialRemsö, A., Renström, E. A., & Bäck, H. (2025) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.70020 · Cited by 4
Rationality, affect, and vote choice
Panagopoulos, C., & Wang, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2025.1640408 · Cited by 8
Trenchs, N. R., & Pedemonte, D. F. (2025) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/emp.102868 · Cited by 3
How Are Social Groups Linked to the Vote? Social Group Perceptions and Party Choice
Stubager, R. (2025) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123425000444 · Cited by 3
“Likewise, voters ’ expressive perceptions of the social group composition of parties ’ electoral alliances have been found to influence political behaviour (for example, Ahler and Sood 2018; Kane et al. 2021; Mason 2018; Mason et al. 2021).”
Polarized Equality? Ideological and Affective Divides Over Gender Equality in Europe
Otteni, C. (2025) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.70120 · Cited by 3
HOBOLT, S. B., & Tilley, J. R. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780198911746.001.0001 · Cited by 6
Understanding the Far-Right Podcast Ecosystem: Production, Politics, and Rhetoric
Dowling, D. O., & Dowling, E. (2026) · Journal of Radio & Audio Media · doi:10.1080/19376529.2025.2592918 · Cited by 5
“Under growing affective polarization (Gidron et al., 2020; Mason, 2018), an increase in beliefs in a conspiracy may occur as partisanship is an important social group attachment like other group identities such as race/ethnicity, region, gender, or age.”
Does Issue Importance Predict Learning About Candidates?
Robison, J. (2020) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa025 · Cited by 3
American Civil Religion in the Era of Trump
Everton, S. F. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14050633 · Cited by 3
Democracy and human nature: a layered system analysis
Auerbach, C. (2023) · Journal of Critical Realism · doi:10.1080/14767430.2023.2253608 · Cited by 3
“For more elaboration of this process see Mason (2018) and Coleman (2021).”
BackgroundPartisanship and divided perceptions of the American and British flags
Trofimchuk, V., & Goh, J. X. (2023) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231200138 · Cited by 4
Party Affiliation in the Southern Electorate
McKee, S. C. (2023) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129231218734 · Cited by 4
“In an age of ideologically, socially, geographically, and emotionally driven partisan polarization (Abramowitz 2022; Iyengar et al. 2019; Mason 2018; Myers 2013), the in fl uence of PID on all things political, has probably never mattered more than it does now.”
BackgroundDo immigrants support environmentalism? Immigrants’ environmental socialization in the United States
Sun, S. B., & Xiaohang, Z. (2024) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/13540688241237490 · Cited by 3
“More speci fi cally, we try to explore how their partisanship, usually considered a “ mega identity ” correlating with other identities and ideologies, in fl uences immigrants ’ pro-environmental values differently (Mason, 2018).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, L.
- Corresponding author
- Mason, Lilliana
- ORCID
- Mason, Lilliana
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W4241842642
- Cited by
- 1,985
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 347 · 2025: 315 · 2024: 238 · 2023: 202 · 2022: 220 · 2021: 226 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 158 · 2018: 50
- FWCI
- 200.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal principles and applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review