Cited by 39Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersReading and Literacy Development

Should Broca’s area include Brodmann area 47?

Open access
Ardila, Alfredo, Bernal, Byron, Rosselli, Monica·2017·Psicothema

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding brain organization of speech production has been a principal goal of neuroscience. Historically, brain speech production has been associated with so-called Broca’s area (Brodmann area –BA- 44 and 45), however, modern neuroimaging developments suggest speech production is associated with networks rather than with areas. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the connectivity of BA47 ( pars orbitalis) in relation to language . METHOD: A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the language network in which BA47 is involved. The Brainmap database was used. Twenty papers corresponding to 29 experimental conditions with a total of 373 subjects were included. RESULTS: Our results suggest that BA47 participates in a “frontal language production system” (or extended Broca’s system). The BA47 connectivity found is also concordant with a minor role in language semantics. CONCLUSIONS: BA47 plays a central role in the language production system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7334/psicothema2016.11

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The left ventrolateral PFC is primarily associated with language and semantic processing, and has also been implicated in processing others' intentions, social norm violations, and social punishments.

    “Instead, this region is primarily associated with language and semantic processing (Petrides, 2016; Ardila, Bernal, & Rosselli, 2017), and has also been implicated in processing others’ intentions (Brunet, Sarfati, Hardy-Baylé, & Decety, 2000), social norm violations (Berthoz, Armony, Blair, & Dolan, 2002) and social punishments (Spitzer, Fischbacher, Herrnberger, Grön, Fehr, 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ardila, A., Bernal, B., & Rosselli, M.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Miami Children's Hospital (US)
  • Florida Atlantic University
Venue
Psicothema
Published
2017-02-01
Volume
1
Issue
29
Pages
73-77
ISSN
  • 0214-9915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1886-144X
OpenAlex
W2585721655
Cited by
39
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psicothema (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
Broca's area, pars orbitalis, speech production, language semantics, brain connectivity
MeSH terms
Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Organ Specificity, Semantics, Speech, Prefrontal Cortex, Connectome, Broca Area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review