The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Modularity of Mind
Abstract
This study synthesizes current information from the various fields of cognitive science in support of a new and exciting theory of mind. Most psychologists study horizontal processes like memory and information flow; Fodor postulates a vertical and modular psychological organization underlying biologically coherent behaviors. This view of mental architecture is consistent with the historical tradition of faculty psychology while integrating a computational approach to mental processes. One of the most notable aspects of Fodor's work is that it articulates features not only of speculative cognitive architectures but also of current research in artificial intelligence. Bradford Books imprint
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This contrasts with classical views that treat perception as a passive internal process in which the brain receives sensory input, processes it, and issues commands for action.”
From Toward Enactive Artificial Intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Fodor, 1983
In the citing paper
“Enactive perspectives contrast with classical representationalist views, in which perception is framed as a passive process where sensory input is transmitted through the body's sensory apparatus and transformed into internal representations of the world.”
From Toward Enactive Artificial Intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Fodor, 1983
In the citing paper
“which implies that phenomenal transparency-opacity is ‘cognitively impenetrable’”
From 'Seeing the Dark': Grounding Phenomenal Transparency and Opacity in Precision Estimation for Active Inference (2018) · cites this paper as Fodor, 1983
In the citing paper
“In other words, in contrast with earlier proposals, Gauthier and colleagues have emphasized a domain-general, but process-specific, understanding of FFA activity (for an extended discussion of domain-general vs. domain-specific cognitive processing, see Fodor 1983).”
From Activity in Right Temporo-Parietal Junction is Not Selective for Theory-of-Mind (2008) · cites this paper as Fodor 1983
In the citing paper
“Such models are thus ultimately functionalist in nature; particular behaviours are explained by appeal to a revision of modality-specific prediction errors, as computed by encapsulated, physically localized brain modules, without specifying a particular computational implementation (Fodor 1983).”
From From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind (2018) · cites this paper as Fodor 1983
In the citing paper
“Our findings suggest that the effect of social and ecological complexity may be limited to influencing more specialized, and potentially domain-specific forms of cognition (188-196).”
From The evolution of self-control. (2014) · cites this paper as [191]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,019
David Zelazo, P., Jacques, S., Burack, J. A., & Frye, D. (2002) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.304 · Cited by 168
Syntactic processes in speech production: the retrieval of grammatical gender
Berkum, J. J. A. V. (1997) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00026-7 · Cited by 170
Bootstrapping Word Boundaries: A Bottom-up Corpus-Based Approach to Speech Segmentation
Cairns, P., Shillcock, R. C., Chater, N., & Levy, J. (1997) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0649 · Cited by 165
Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., & Flude, B. M. (1990) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749008401234 · Cited by 170
Minimodularity and the perception of layout.
Bruno, N., & Cutting, J. E. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.117.2.161 · Cited by 209
The syntax of phonology : A radically substance-free approach
Blaho, S. (2008) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 170
Conceptual Change and Wine Expertise
Solomon, G. E. A. (1997) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0601_3 · Cited by 168
Defining and Classifying Learning Disabilities and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1995) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/08830738950100s111 · Cited by 163
Schwartz, B. D., & Gubala-Ryzak, M. (1992) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/026765839200800102 · Cited by 169
Sherry, D. F. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070324 · Cited by 167
Looking down, around, and up: Mechanistic explanation in psychology
Bechtel, W. (2009) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080903238948 · Cited by 165
Putting ‘input’ in its proper place
Carroll, S. E. (1999) · Second language Research · doi:10.1191/026765899674928444 · Cited by 168
Cognitive Penetration and Perception of Art
Stokes, D. (2014) · dialectica · doi:10.1111/1746-8361.12049 · Cited by 171
Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study*1
Bates, E. A. (1987) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(87)90116-7 · Cited by 168
Conway, C. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1416.009 · Cited by 181
Précis of The Origin of Concepts
Carey, S. E. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000919 · Cited by 180
Repetition priming of face recognition
Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., Flude, B. M., & Hay, D. C. (1987) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640748708401784 · Cited by 163
Connectionism and dynamic systems: are they really different?
Thelen, E., & Bates, E. A. (2003) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00294 · Cited by 163
Information Processing Models: Microscopes of the Mind
Massaro, D. W., & Cowan, N. (1993) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.002123 · Cited by 169
Hannes Rakoczy, B. (2015) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0860-8 · Cited by 167
Sera, M. D., Elieff, C., Forbes, J. N., et al. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.377 · Cited by 165
Cognitive constraints on compositional systems
Lerdahl, F. (1992) · Contemporary Music Review · doi:10.1080/07494469200640161 · Cited by 171
Cardon, D., Cointet, J., Mazières, A., & Carey-Libbrecht, L. (2018) · Réseaux · doi:10.3917/res.211.0173 · Cited by 246
Specialisation within the semantic system
Shallice, T. (1988) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643298808252929 · Cited by 165
Real space and represented space: Cross-cultural perspectives
Deręgowski, J. B. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00024286 · Cited by 161
Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science*
Karmiloff‐Smith, A. (1994) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.3109/13682829409041485 · Cited by 177
Salience and Context Effects: Two Are Better Than One
Peleg, O., Giora, R., & Fein, O. (2001) · Metaphor and Symbol · doi:10.1080/10926488.2001.9678894 · Cited by 163
Pre‐Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Sensitivity to Likely Upcoming Meaning and Structure
DeLong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Marta Kutas, A. (2014) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12093 · Cited by 172
Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing
Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1990) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(90)90064-7 · Cited by 162
Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The state of the art
Jackendoff, R. S. (2007) · The Linguistic Review · doi:10.1515/tlr.2007.014 · Cited by 163
Stanovich, K. E. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0022 · Cited by 169
The cortical dynamics of speaking: present shortcomings and future avenues
Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1120878 · Cited by 163
Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616635613 · Cited by 167
Winter, B. (2019) · Converging evidence in language and communication research · doi:10.1075/celcr.20 · Cited by 182
Harnad, S. R. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/0470018860.s00490 · Cited by 161
Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures
Learmonth, A. E., Newcombe, N. S., Sheridan, N., & Jones, M. C. (2008) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00686.x · Cited by 158
Ad Hoc Concepts, Polysemy and the Lexicon
Carston, R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108290593.014 · Cited by 162
Johnson, S. C. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1237 · Cited by 163
Complementarity Theory: Why Human Social Capacities Evolved to Require Cultural Complements
Fiske, A. P. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0401_7 · Cited by 165
The Meanings of “Imagine” Part I: Constructive Imagination
Leeuwen, N. V. (2013) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00508.x · Cited by 159
Bertolero, M. A., Yeo, B. T. T., & D’Esposito, M. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01189-w · Cited by 164
The cognitive neuropsychology of developmental (and acquired) dyslexia: A critical survey
Ellis, A. W. (1985) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643298508252865 · Cited by 159
Transcending inductive category formation in learning
Schank, R. C., Collins, G. C., & Hunter, L. (1986) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00051578 · Cited by 153
Foreign Language Proficiency and Working Memory Capacity
van den Noort, M. W. M. L., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2006) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.11.4.289 · Cited by 170
Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution
Nick Chater, A., Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0807191106 · Cited by 150
A new look at domain specificity: Insights from social neuroscience
Spunt, R. P., & Adolphs, R. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.76 · Cited by 149
Learning to see faces and objects
Tarr, M. J., & Cheng, Y. D. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00010-4 · Cited by 154
Intuitive knowledge of linguistic co-reference
Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1997) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00788-3 · Cited by 157
Griffiths, P. E., & Scarantino, A. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816826.023 · Cited by 165
Assessment in Context: The Alternative to Standardized Testing
Gardner, H. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2968-8_4 · Cited by 155
Toward a computational model of expression in music performance: The GERM model
Juslin, P. N., Friberg, A., & Bresin, R. (2001) · Musicae Scientiae · doi:10.1177/10298649020050s104 · Cited by 161
The Social Psychophysics of Cooperation: Nonverbal Communication in a Public Goods Game
Kurzban, R. (2001) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1012563421824 · Cited by 155
Moyle, M. J., Weismer, S. E., Evans, J. L., & Lindstrom, M. J. (2007) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/035 · Cited by 155
Spontaneous tool use and sensorimotor intelligence in Cebus compared with other monkeys and apes
Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00057678 · Cited by 155
The perception of causality in infancy
Saxe, R. R., & Carey, S. E. (2006) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.05.005 · Cited by 149
Enzymatic Computation and Cognitive Modularity
Barrett, H. C. (2005) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00285.x · Cited by 157
The epistemic impact of the etiology of experience
Siegel, S. (2012) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-012-0059-5 · Cited by 156
Magnuson, J. S., Mirman, D., & Myers, E. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0027 · Cited by 163
The Developmental Lag Hypothesis in Reading: Longitudinal and Matched Reading-Level Comparisons
Stanovich, K. E., Nathan, R. G., & Zolman, J. E. (1988) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130390 · Cited by 157
Jurafsky, D. S. (1992) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada604298 · Cited by 155
Eye Movements and Spoken Language Comprehension
Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012369374-7/50023-7 · Cited by 154
Evidence for a Distinction between Judged and Perceived Causality
Schlottmann, A., & Shanks, D. R. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724989243000055 · Cited by 154
Lindeman, M., & Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M. (2012) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027158 · Cited by 147
New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity
Wilson, D. (2004) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2004.02.005 · Cited by 157
Knowing What? Radical Versus Conservative Enactivism
Hutto, D. D. (2005) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-005-9001-z · Cited by 153
Brain evolution by brain pathway duplication
Chakraborty, M., & Jarvis, E. D. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0056 · Cited by 150
Seeing and Conceptualizing: Modularity and the Shallow Contents of Perception
Mandelbaum, E. (2017) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12368 · Cited by 152
Hatcher, P. J., & Hulme, C. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2480 · Cited by 153
Stanovich, K. E. (1985) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/bf02659181 · Cited by 149
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Anderson, B. (1997) · Language Acquisition · doi:10.1207/s15327817la0604_2 · Cited by 152
A biliteracy agenda for genre research
Gentil, G. (2011) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.006 · Cited by 152
Social Constraints on the Direct Perception of Emotions and Intentions
Gallagher, S., & Varga, S. (2013) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-013-9203-x · Cited by 152
Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access
Rodd, J. M. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619885860 · Cited by 163
The Sociopsychometrics of Learning Disabilities
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949903200408 · Cited by 151
A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text
Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1991) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/0304-422x(91)90007-c · Cited by 151
The Weirdest People in the World?Preprint
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1601785 · Cited by 176
Complementary neural representations for faces and words: A computational exploration
Plaut, D. C., & Behrmann, M. (2011) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2011.609812 · Cited by 152
Evidence against epiphenomenalism
Block, N. J. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0007179x · Cited by 150
Japyassú, H. F., & Laland, K. N. (2017) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-017-1069-7 · Cited by 146
Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process?
Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1997) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03214214 · Cited by 144
Visual Object Recognition: Do We Know More Now Than We Did 20 Years Ago?
Peissig, J. J., & Tarr, M. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.102904.190114 · Cited by 154
Ainsworth-Darnell, K., Shulman, H. G., & Boland, J. E. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2537 · Cited by 146
Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar
White, L. (1990) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009049 · Cited by 148
Monitoring and Control in Language Production
Nozari, N., & Novick, J. M. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417702419 · Cited by 152
Enhanced Passive and Active Processing of Syllables in Musician Children
Chobert, J., Marie, C., Clément, F., Schön, D., & Besson, M. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00088 · Cited by 154
Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: Investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
Sereno, S. C., O'Donnell, P. J., & Rayner, K. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.335 · Cited by 146
Wilson, M., & Cook, P. F. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1013-x · Cited by 144
Vergara, R. C., Jaramillo-Riveri, S., Luarte, A., Moënne‐Loccoz, C., Fuentes, R., Couve, A., & Maldonado, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2019.00049 · Cited by 149
CIRCULARITY, RELIABILITY, AND THE COGNITIVE PENETRABILITY OF PERCEPTION
Lyons, J. (2011) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2011.00205.x · Cited by 145
Conceptual effects on representational momentum.
Reed, C. L., & Vinson, N. G. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.839 · Cited by 145
Cultural Neuroscience: Progress and Promise
Chiao, J. Y., Cheon, B. K., Pornpattananangkul, N., Mrazek, A. J., & Blizinsky, K. D. (2013) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2013.752715 · Cited by 151
Lexical pragmatics, ad hoc concepts and metaphor: A Relevance Theory perspective
Carston, R. (2010) · Cited by 144
Congenital prosopagnosia without object agnosia? A literature review
Geskin, J., & Behrmann, M. (2017) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2017.1392295 · Cited by 142
Précis of How Children Learn the Meanings of Words
Bloom, P. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000139 · Cited by 155
Consciousness from a first-person perspective
Velmans, M. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00072150 · Cited by 144
Nánay, B. (2010) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2010.00407.x · Cited by 143
Defining dyslexia as a developmental language disorder
Catts, H. W. (1989) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/bf02656900 · Cited by 141
Peretz, I., & Kolinsky, R. (1993) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749308401048 · Cited by 148
Production of complex syntax in normal ageing and alzheimer's disease
Bates, E. A., Harris, C. R., Marchman, V. A., Wulfeck, B. B., & Kritchevsky, M. (1995) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969508407113 · Cited by 148
Evolutionary Psychology: The Burdens of Proof
Lloyd, E. A. (1999) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1006638501739 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Fodor, J. A.
- Corresponding author
- Fodor, Jerry A.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1983-04-06
- OpenAlex
- W2888882506
- Cited by
- 7,734
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 232 · 2025: 241 · 2024: 224 · 2023: 181 · 2022: 186 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 252 · 2019: 402 · 2018: 243 · 2017: 205 · 2016: 180 · 2015: 196 · 2014: 256 · 2013: 181 · 2012: 178
- FWCI
- 87.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Keywords
- modularity of mind, Jerry Fodor, theory of mind, cognitive architecture, faculty psychology, computational theory of mind, artificial intelligence, cognitive processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
