Cited by 757Usability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology InteractionInteractive and Immersive Displays

The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction

de Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius·2005·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

A theory of HCI that uses concepts from semiotics and computer science to focus on the communication between designers and users during interaction. In The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction, Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza proposes an account of HCI that draws on concepts from semiotics and computer science to investigate the relationship between user and designer. Semiotics is the study of signs, and the essence of semiotic engineering is the communication between designers and users at interaction time; designers must somehow be present in the interface to tell users how to use the signs that make up a system or program. This approach, which builds on—but goes further than—the currently dominant user-centered approach, allows designers to communicate their overall vision and therefore helps users understand designs—rather than simply which icon to click. According to de Souza's account, both designers and users are interlocutors in an overall communication process that takes place through an interface of words, graphics, and behavior. Designers must tell users what they mean by the artifact they have created, and users must understand and respond to what they are being told. By coupling semiotic theory and engineering, de Souza's approach to HCI design encompasses the principles, the materials, the processes, and the possibilities for producing meaningful interactive computer system discourse and achieves a broader perspective than cognitive, ethnographic, or ergonomic approaches. De Souza begins with a theoretical overview and detailed exposition of the semiotic engineering account of HCI. She then shows how this approach can be applied specifically to HCI evaluation and design of online help systems, customization and end-user programming, and multiuser applications. Finally, she reflects on the potential and opportunities for research in semiotic engineering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/6175.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If a representation is intended to convey meaning, that meaning only truly exists when generated by a viewer, listener, or user.

    “If a representation (like a virtual exhibit) is intended to convey meaning, that meaning only truly exists when generated by a viewer, listener, or user [48].”
  • Meaning lies not in the content itself but in how that content is understood by someone.

    “According to modeling theory, meaning lies not in the content itself but in how that content is understood by someone.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Souza, C. S.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2005-02-11
OpenAlex
W2117812870
Cited by
757
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 39
FWCI
22.30
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
semiotic engineering, human-computer interaction theory, semiotics, designer-user communication, user-centered design, interface design, online help systems, customization, end-user programming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review