Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global analysis of p53-regulated transcription identifies its direct targets and unexpected regulatory mechanisms

Open access
Allen, Mary Ann, Andrysik, Zdenek, Dengler, Veronica L, Mellert, Hestia S, Guarnieri, Anna, Freeman, Justin A, Sullivan, Kelly D, Galbraith, Matthew D, Luo, Xin, Kraus, W Lee, Dowell, Robin D, Espinosa, Joaquin M·2014·eLife

Abstract

The p53 transcription factor is a potent suppressor of tumor growth. We report here an analysis of its direct transcriptional program using Global Run-On sequencing (GRO-seq). Shortly after MDM2 inhibition by Nutlin-3, low levels of p53 rapidly activate ∼200 genes, most of them not previously established as direct targets. This immediate response involves all canonical p53 effector pathways, including apoptosis. Comparative global analysis of RNA synthesis vs steady state levels revealed that microarray profiling fails to identify low abundance transcripts directly activated by p53. Interestingly, p53 represses a subset of its activation targets before MDM2 inhibition. GRO-seq uncovered a plethora of gene-specific regulatory features affecting key survival and apoptotic genes within the p53 network. p53 regulates hundreds of enhancer-derived RNAs. Strikingly, direct p53 targets harbor pre-activated enhancers highly transcribed in p53 null cells. Altogether, these results enable the study of many uncharacterized p53 target genes and unexpected regulatory mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.02200

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Anders, 2010, Differential expression analysis for sequence count data, Genome Biology, 11, R106, 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Andrysik, 2013, A genetic screen identifies TCF3/E2A and TRIAP1 as pathway-specific regulators of the cellular response to p53 activation, Cell Reports, 3, 1, 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.014 · DOI
  3. Benson, 2013, p53-dependent gene repression through p21 is mediated by recruitment of E2F4 repression complexes, Oncogene, 10.1038/onc.2013.378 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Biderman, 2012, Mdm2 and MdmX as regulators of gene expression, Genes & cancer, 3, 264, 10.1177/1947601912455331 · DOI
  5. Chen, 1996, p53 levels, functional domains, and DNA damage determine the extent of the apoptotic response of tumor cells, Genes & Development, 10, 2438, 10.1101/gad.10.19.2438 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cohen, 1998, Characterization of a new intrabody directed against the N-terminal region of human p53, Oncogene, 17, 2445, 10.1038/sj.onc.1202190 · DOI
  7. Core, 2008, Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters, Science, 322, 1845, 10.1126/science.1162228 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Das, 2007, Hzf Determines cell survival upon genotoxic stress by modulating p53 transactivation, Cell, 130, 624, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.013 · DOI
  9. el-Deiry, 1993, WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression, Cell, 75, 817, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90500-P · DOI · Paper page
  10. Espinosa, 2001, Transcriptional regulation by p53 through intrinsic DNA/chromatin binding and site-directed cofactor recruitment, Molecular Cell, 8, 57, 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00283-0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Espinosa, 2003, p53 functions through stress- and promoter-specific recruitment of transcription initiation components before and after DNA damage, Molecular Cell, 12, 1015, 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00359-9 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gomes, 2006, Gene-specific requirement for P-TEFb activity and RNA polymerase II phosphorylation within the p53 transcriptional program, Genes & Development, 20, 601, 10.1101/gad.1398206 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hah, 2011, A rapid, extensive, and transient transcriptional response to estrogen signaling in breast cancer cells, Cell, 145, 622, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.042 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hargreaves, 2009, Control of inducible gene expression by signal-dependent transcriptional elongation, Cell, 138, 129, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.047 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Henry, 2012, A DR4:tBID axis drives the p53 apoptotic response by promoting oligomerization of poised BAX, The EMBO Journal, 31, 1266, 10.1038/emboj.2011.498 · DOI
  16. Ivshina, 2006, Genetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancer, Cancer Research, 66, 10292, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4414 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jiao, 2013, RNA-mediated gene activation, Epigenetics, 9, 27, 10.4161/epi.26942 · DOI
  18. Lal, 2011, Capture of microRNA-bound mRNAs identifies the tumor suppressor miR-34a as a regulator of growth factor signaling, PLOS Genetics, 7, e1002363, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002363 · DOI
  19. Laptenko, 2006, Transcriptional regulation by p53: one protein, many possibilities, Cell Death and Differentiation, 13, 951, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401916 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Li, 2012, Distinct regulatory mechanisms and functions for p53-activated and p53-repressed DNA damage response genes in embryonic stem cells, Molecular Cell, 46, 30, 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.020 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lowe, 1994, p53 status and the efficacy of cancer therapy in vivo, Science, 266, 807, 10.1126/science.7973635 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Morachis, 2010, Regulation of the p53 transcriptional response by structurally diverse core promoters, Genes & Development, 24, 135, 10.1101/gad.1856710 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Nikulenkov, 2012, Insights into p53 transcriptional function via genome-wide chromatin occupancy and gene expression analysis, Cell Death and Differentiation, 19, 1992, 10.1038/cdd.2012.89 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ohkubo, 2006, Excess HDM2 impacts cell cycle and apoptosis and has a selective effect on p53-dependent transcription, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281, 16943, 10.1074/jbc.M601388200 · DOI
  25. Oliner, 1993, Oncoprotein MDM2 conceals the activation domain of tumour suppressor p53, Nature, 362, 857, 10.1038/362857a0 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Picksley, 1994, Immunochemical analysis of the interaction of p53 with MDM2;–fine mapping of the MDM2 binding site on p53 using synthetic peptides, Oncogene, 9, 2523
  27. Polyak, 1997, A model for p53-induced apoptosis, Nature, 389, 300, 10.1038/38525 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Poyurovsky, 2010, The C terminus of p53 binds the N-terminal domain of MDM2, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 17, 982, 10.1038/nsmb.1872 · DOI
  29. Riemenschneider, 1999, Amplification and overexpression of the MDM4 (MDMX) gene from 1q32 in a subset of malignant gliomas without TP53 mutation or MDM2 amplification, Cancer Research, 59, 6091
  30. Smeenk, 2008, Characterization of genome-wide p53-binding sites upon stress response, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, 3639, 10.1093/nar/gkn232 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Smeenk, 2011, Role of p53 serine 46 in p53 target gene regulation, PLOS ONE, 6, e17574, 10.1371/journal.pone.0017574 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Szak, 2001, Kinetics of p53 binding to promoter sites in vivo, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 21, 3375, 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3375-3386.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Tang, 1998, Constitutive expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 is transcriptionally regulated by the tumor suppressor protein p53, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273, 29156, 10.1074/jbc.273.44.29156 · DOI
  34. Thut, 1997, Repression of p53-mediated transcription by MDM2: a dual mechanism, Genes & Development, 11, 1974, 10.1101/gad.11.15.1974 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Wang, 2013, Mapping the p53 transcriptome universe using p53 natural polymorphs, Cell Death and Differentiation, 21, 521, 10.1038/cdd.2013.132 · DOI
  36. White, 2006, Mouse double minute 2 associates with chromatin in the presence of p53 and is released to facilitate activation of transcription, Cancer Research, 66, 3463, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1381 · DOI
  37. Yan, 2007, BLIMP1 regulates cell growth through repression of p53 transcription, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 1841, 10.1073/pnas.0605562104 · DOI
  38. Zhao, 2000, Analysis of p53-regulated gene expression patterns using oligonucleotide arrays, Genes & Development, 14, 981, 10.1101/gad.827700 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Allen, M. A., Andrysik, Z., Dengler, V. L., Mellert, H. S., Guarnieri, A., Freeman, J. A., Sullivan, K. D., Galbraith, M. D., Luo, X., Kraus, W. L., Dowell, R. D., & Espinosa, J. M.
Venue
eLife
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
3
Pages
e02200-e02200
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981974167
Cited by
238
References
14
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Early Career Award)
  • National Institutes of Health (RO1 CA117907-07, 2T15 LM009451)
  • Butcher Foundation
  • Boettcher Foundation
  • National Science Foundation (MCB1243522)
  • American Cancer Society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global analysis of p53-regulated transcription identifies its direct targets and unexpected regulatory mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7554/elife.02200
The paper
Allen, M. A., Andrysik, Z., Dengler, V. L., Mellert, H. S., Guarnieri, A., Freeman, J. A., Sullivan, K. D., Galbraith, M. D., Luo, X., Kraus, W. L., Dowell, R. D., & Espinosa, J. M. (2014). Global analysis of p53-regulated transcription identifies its direct targets and unexpected regulatory mechanisms. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.02200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.