Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of p53 Serine 46 in p53 Target Gene Regulation

Open access
Smeenk, Leonie, van Heeringen, Simon J., Koeppel, Max, Gilbert, Bianca, Janssen-Megens, Eva, Stunnenberg, Hendrik G., Lohrum, Marion·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The tumor suppressor p53 plays a crucial role in cellular growth control inducing a plethora of different response pathways. The molecular mechanisms that discriminate between the distinct p53-responses have remained largely elusive. Here, we have analyzed the p53-regulated pathways induced by Actinomycin D and Etoposide treatment resulting in more growth arrested versus apoptotic cells respectively. We found that the genome-wide p53 DNA-binding patterns are almost identical upon both treatments notwithstanding transcriptional differences that we observed in global transcriptome analysis. To assess the role of post-translational modifications in target gene choice and activation we investigated the genome-wide level of phosphorylation of Serine 46 of p53 bound to DNA (p53-pS46) and of Serine 15 (p53-pS15). Interestingly, the extent of S46 phosphorylation of p53 bound to DNA is considerably higher in cells directed towards apoptosis while the degree of phosphorylation at S15 remains highly similar. Moreover, our data suggest that following different chemotherapeutical treatments, the amount of chromatin-associated p53 phosphorylated at S46 but not at pS15 is higher on certain apoptosis related target genes. Our data provide evidence that cell fate decisions are not made primarily on the level of general p53 DNA-binding and that post-translationally modified p53 can have distinct DNA-binding characteristics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0017574

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. SP Hussain, 1999, p53 mutation spectrum and load: the generation of hypotheses linking the exposure of endogenous or exogenous carcinogens to human cancer., Mutat Res, 428, 23, 10.1016/S1383-5742(99)00028-9 · DOI
  2. J Espinosa, 2008, Mechanisms of regulatory diversity within the p53 transcriptional network., Oncogene, 27, 4013, 10.1038/onc.2008.37 · DOI
  3. A Sullivan, 2007, ASPP: a new family of oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes., Br J Cancer, 96, 196, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603525 · DOI · Paper page
  4. S Das, 2007, Hzf Determines cell survival upon genotoxic stress by modulating p53 transactivation., Cell, 130, 624, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.013 · DOI
  5. T Tanaka, 2007, hCAS/CSE1L associates with chromatin and regulates expression of select p53 target genes., Cell, 130, 638, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.001 · DOI
  6. A Olsson, 2007, How important are post-translational modifications in p53 for selectivity in target-gene transcription and tumour suppression?, Cell Death Differ, 14, 1561, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402196 · DOI
  7. CL Brooks, 2003, Ubiquitination, phosphorylation and acetylation: the molecular basis for p53 regulation., Curr Opin Cell Biol, 15, 164, 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00003-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. KK Khanna, 1998, ATM associates with and phosphorylates p53: mapping the region of interaction., Nat Genet, 20, 398, 10.1038/3882 · DOI · Paper page
  9. K Oda, 2000, p53AIP1, a potential mediator of p53-dependent apoptosis, and its regulation by Ser-46-phosphorylated p53., Cell, 102, 849, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00073-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. TG Hofmann, 2002, Regulation of p53 activity by its interaction with homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2., Nat Cell Biol, 4, 1, 10.1038/ncb715 · DOI · Paper page
  11. G D'orazi, 2002, Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 46 and mediates apoptosis., Nat Cell Biol, 4, 11, 10.1038/ncb714 · DOI · Paper page
  12. N Taira, 2007, DYRK2 is targeted to the nucleus and controls p53 via Ser46 phosphorylation in the apoptotic response to DNA damage., Mol Cell, 25, 725, 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  13. M Kodama, 2010, Requirement of ATM for rapid p53 phosphorylation at Ser46 without Ser/Thr-Gln sequences., Molecular and Cellular Biology, 30, 1620, 10.1128/MCB.00810-09 · DOI
  14. K Yoshida, 2006, Protein kinase C delta regulates Ser46 phosphorylation of p53 tumor suppressor in the apoptotic response to DNA damage., J Biol Chem, 281, 5734, 10.1074/jbc.M512074200 · DOI · Paper page
  15. R Okoshi, 2008, Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase induces p53-dependent apoptotic cell death in response to energetic stress., J Biol Chem, 283, 3979, 10.1074/jbc.M705232200 · DOI · Paper page
  16. JL Perfettini, 2005, Essential role of p53 phosphorylation by p38 MAPK in apoptosis induction by the HIV-1 envelope., J Exp Med, 201, 279, 10.1084/jem.20041502 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Y Zhang, 2008, Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)., Genome Biol, 9, R137, 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · DOI · Paper page
  18. KD Pruitt, 2007, NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins., Nucleic Acids Res, 35, D61, 10.1093/nar/gkl842 · DOI · Paper page
  19. L Smeenk, 2008, Characterization of genome-wide p53-binding sites upon stress response., Nucleic Acids Research, 36, 3639, 10.1093/nar/gkn232 · DOI · Paper page
  20. daW Huang, 2009, Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources., Nat Protoc, 4, 44, 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · DOI · Paper page
  21. TR Hupp, 1992, Regulation of the specific DNA binding function of p53., Cell, 71, 875, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90562-Q · DOI · Paper page
  22. KH Vousden, 2000, p53: death star., Cell, 103, 691, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00171-9 · DOI · Paper page
  23. L Vrba, 2008, p53 induces distinct epigenetic states at its direct target promoters., BMC Genomics, 9, 486, 10.1186/1471-2164-9-486 · DOI
  24. MD Kaeser, 2002, From the Cover: Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis fails to support the latency model for regulation of p53 DNA binding activity invivo., PNAS, 99, 95, 10.1073/pnas.012283399 · DOI · Paper page
  25. H Shaked, 2008, Chromatin immunoprecipitation-on-chip reveals stress-dependent p53 occupancy in primary normal cells but not in established cell lines., Cancer Research, 68, 9671, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0865 · DOI
  26. LD Mayo, 2005, Phosphorylation of human p53 at serine 46 determines promoter selection and whether apoptosis is attenuated or amplified., J Biol Chem, 280, 25953, 10.1074/jbc.M503026200 · DOI
  27. DV Bulavin, 1999, Phosphorylation of human p53 by p38 kinase coordinates N-terminal phosphorylation and apoptosis in response to UV radiation., EMBO J, 18, 6845, 10.1093/emboj/18.23.6845 · DOI · Paper page
  28. A Shmueli, 2007, Mdm2: p53's lifesaver?, Mol Cell, 25, 794, 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.03.006 · DOI
  29. C Rinaldo, 2007, MDM2-regulated degradation of HIPK2 prevents p53Ser46 phosphorylation and DNA damage-induced apoptosis., Mol Cell, 25, 739, 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.008 · DOI
  30. Y Tang, 2006, Tip60-dependent acetylation of p53 modulates the decision between cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis., Mol Cell, 24, 827, 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.021 · DOI · Paper page
  31. L Smeenk, 2010, Behind the scenes: unravelling the molecular mechanisms of p53 target gene selectivity (Review)., Int J Oncol, 37, 1061
  32. C Dai, 2010, p53 post-translational modification: deregulated in tumorigenesis., Trends Mol Med, 16, 528, 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  33. P Zacchi, 2002, The prolyl isomerase Pin1 reveals a mechanism to control p53 functions after genotoxic insults., Nature, 419, 853, 10.1038/nature01120 · DOI · Paper page
  34. CD Braastad, 2003, Constitutive DNase I hypersensitivity of p53-regulated promoters., J Biol Chem, 278, 8261, 10.1074/jbc.M204256200 · DOI
  35. CJ Braun, 2008, p53-Responsive micrornas 192 and 215 are capable of inducing cell cycle arrest., Cancer Research, 68, 10094, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1569 · DOI · Paper page
  36. SA Georges, 2009, Cell cycle arrest or apoptosis by p53: are microRNAs-192/215 and -34 making the decision?, Cell Cycle, 8, 680, 10.4161/cc.8.5.8076 · DOI
  37. H Hermeking, 2007, p53 enters the microRNA world., Cancer Cell, 12, 414, 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.10.028 · DOI · Paper page
  38. MA Lohrum, 2001, C-terminal ubiquitination of p53 contributes to nuclear export., Molecular and Cellular Biology, 21, 8521, 10.1128/MCB.21.24.8521-8532.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  39. S Denissov, 2007, Identification of novel functional TBP-binding sites and general factor repertoires., Embo J, 26, 944, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601550 · DOI
  40. RA Irizarry, 2003, Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data., Nucleic Acids Res, 31, e15, 10.1093/nar/gng015 · DOI · Paper page
  41. MJ de Hoon, 2004, Open source clustering software., Bioinformatics, 20, 1453, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth078 · DOI · Paper page
  42. AJ Saldanha, 2004, Java Treeview–extensible visualization of microarray data., Bioinformatics, 20, 3246, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth349 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Smeenk, L., van Heeringen, S. J., Koeppel, M., Gilbert, B., Janssen-Megens, E., Stunnenberg, H. G., & Lohrum, M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-03-04
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
e17574
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098276373
Cited by
169
References
9
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of p53 Serine 46 in p53 Target Gene Regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0017574
The paper
Smeenk, L., van Heeringen, S. J., Koeppel, M., Gilbert, B., Janssen-Megens, E., Stunnenberg, H. G., & Lohrum, M. (2011). Role of p53 Serine 46 in p53 Target Gene Regulation. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017574

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.