The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular mechanism of active Cas7-11 in processing CRISPR RNA and interfering target RNA
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Cas7-11 is a Type III-E CRISPR Cas effector that confers programmable RNA cleavage and has potential applications in RNA interference. Cas7-11 encodes a single polypeptide containing four Cas7- and one Cas11-like segments that obscures the distinction between the multi-subunit Class 1 and the single-subunit Class-2 CRISPR Cas systems. We report a cryo-EM (cryo-electron microscopy) structure of the active Cas7-11 from Desulfonema ishimotonii (DiCas7-11) that reveals the molecular basis for RNA processing and interference activities. DiCas7-11 arranges its Cas7- and Cas11-like domains in an extended form that resembles the backbone made up by four Cas7 and one Cas11 subunits in the multi-subunit enzymes. Unlike the multi-subunit enzymes, however, the backbone of DiCas7-11 contains evolutionarily different Cas7 and Cas11 domains, giving rise to their unique functionality. The first Cas7-like domain nearly engulfs the last 15 direct repeat nucleotides in processing and recognition of the CRISPR RNA, and its free-standing fragment retains most of the activity. Both the second and the third Cas7-like domains mediate target RNA cleavage in a metal-dependent manner. The structure and mutational data indicate that the long variable insertion to the fourth Cas7 domain has little impact on RNA processing or targeting, suggesting the possibility for engineering a compact and programmable RNA interference tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Programmable RNA targeting with the single-protein CRISPR effector Cas7-11
Özcan, A., Krajeski, R., Ioannidi, E., Lee, B., Gardner, A., Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V., Abudayyeh, O. O., & Gootenberg, J. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03886-5 · Cited by 263
Structural basis of CRISPR-Cas Type III prokaryotic defence systems
Molina, R., Sofos, N., & Montoya, G. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2020.06.010 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“Bottom, RNA processing results analyzed on polyacrylamide urea gel for the wild-type (1) 393 and other pre-crRNA (2-8) by the wild-type DiCas7-11 (WT), the His43 to alanine mutant 394”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Abudayyeh, 2016, C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided rna-targeting CRISPR effector, Science, 353, 10.1126/science.aaf5573 · DOI · Paper page
- Afonine, 2018, Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography, Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology, 74, 531, 10.1107/S2059798318006551 · DOI
- Carte, 2008, Cas6 is an endoribonuclease that generates guide RNAs for invader defense in prokaryotes, Genes & Development, 22, 3489, 10.1101/gad.1742908 · DOI
- East-Seletsky, 2016, Two distinct RNase activities of CRISPR-c2c2 enable guide-RNA processing and RNA detection, Nature, 538, 270, 10.1038/nature19802 · DOI · Paper page
- Elmore, 2016, Bipartite recognition of target RNAs activates DNA cleavage by the type III-B CRISPR-Cas system, Genes & Development, 30, 447, 10.1101/gad.272153.115 · DOI
- Emsley, 2004, Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics, Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography, 60, 2126, 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
- Emsley, 2010, Features and development of coot, Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
- Hale, 2009, Rna-Guided RNA cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-cas protein complex, Cell, 139, 945, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.040 · DOI · Paper page
- Hochstrasser, 2015, Cutting it close: CRISPR-associated endoribonuclease structure and function, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 40, 58, 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.007 · DOI
- Hu, 2022, Craspase is a crispr rna-guided, rna-activated protease, Science, 377, 1278, 10.1126/science.add5064 · DOI
- Jia, 2019, Type III-A CRISPR-Cas csm complexes: assembly, periodic RNA cleavage, DNase activity regulation, and autoimmunity, Molecular Cell, 73, 264, 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.007 · DOI
- Kato, 2022, Structure and engineering of the type III-E CRISPR-cas7-11 effector complex, Cell, 185, 2324, 10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.003 · DOI
- Kazlauskiene, 2016, Spatiotemporal control of type III-A CRISPR-Cas immunity: coupling DNA degradation with the target RNA recognition, Molecular Cell, 62, 295, 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024 · DOI · Paper page
- Kimanius, 2021, New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0, The Biochemical Journal, 478, 4169, 10.1042/BCJ20210708 · DOI
- Li, 2015, Structural principles of CRISPR RNA processing, Structure, 23, 13, 10.1016/j.str.2014.10.006 · DOI
- Liebschner, 2019, Macromolecular structure determination using x-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in phenix, Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology, 75, 861, 10.1107/S2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
- Makarova, 2011, Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems, Biology Direct, 6, 10.1186/1745-6150-6-38 · DOI
- Makarova, 2020, Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants, Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 18, 67, 10.1038/s41579-019-0299-x · DOI · Paper page
- Meeske, 2018, Rna guide complementarity prevents self-targeting in type VI CRISPR systems, Molecular Cell, 71, 791, 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.013 · DOI
- Pettersen, 2004, UCSF chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis, Journal of Computational Chemistry, 25, 1605, 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
- Pettersen, 2021, UCSF chimerax: structure visualiza- tion for researchers, educators, and developers, Protein Sci, 30, 70, 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
- Punjani, 2017, CryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination, Nature Methods, 14, 290, 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
- Samai, 2015, Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA cleavage during type III CRISPR-Cas immunity, Cell, 161, 1164, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.027 · DOI · Paper page
- Sridhara, 2022, Structural and biochemical characterization of in vivo assembled Lactococcus lactis CRISPR-csm complex, Communications Biology, 5, 10.1038/s42003-022-03187-1 · DOI
- Tamulaitis, 2014, Programmable RNA shredding by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Streptococcus thermophilus, Molecular Cell, 56, 506, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.027 · DOI
- van Beljouw, 2021, The gramp CRISPR-Cas effector is an RNA endonuclease complexed with a caspase-like peptidase, Science, 373, 1349, 10.1126/science.abk2718 · DOI
- Wang, 2012, The mysterious ramp proteins and their roles in small RNA-based immunity, Protein Science, 21, 463, 10.1002/pro.2044 · DOI
- You, 2019, Structure studies of the CRISPR-csm complex reveal mechanism of co-transcriptional interference, Cell, 176, 239, 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.052 · DOI
- Zhang, 2016, Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction, Journal of Structural Biology, 193, 1, 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003 · DOI
- Zheng, 2017, MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy, Nature Methods, 14, 331, 10.1038/nmeth.4193 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Goswami, H. N., Rai, J., Das, A., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Hong
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2022-10-03
- Volume
- 11
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9629832
- OpenAlex
- W4300688392
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (GM101343)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- RNA interference, cryo-EM structure
- MeSH terms
- RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, RNA, RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional, RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida, Cryoelectron Microscopy, CRISPR-Cas Systems, CRISPR-Associated Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review