CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 171Treatment of Major DepressionDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maintenance Treatment of Depression in Old Age: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Combined With Antidepressant Pharmacotherapy

Open access
Reynolds, Charles F., Butters, Meryl A., Lopez, Oscar, Pollock, Bruce G., Dew, Mary Amanda, Mulsant, Benoit H., Lenze, Eric J., Holm, Margo, Rogers, Joan C., Mazumdar, Sati, Houck, Patricia R., Begley, Amy, Anderson, Stewart, Karp, Jordan F., Miller, Mark D., Whyte, Ellen M., Stack, Jacqueline, Gildengers, Ariel, Szanto, Katalin, Bensasi, Salem, Kaufer, Daniel I., Kamboh, M. Ilyas, DeKosky, Steven T.·2011·Archives of General Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.184PMC PMC3076045
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cognitive impairment in late-life depression is a core feature of the illness. OBJECTIVE: To test whether donepezil hydrochloride and antidepressant therapy is superior to placebo and antidepressant therapy in improving cognitive performance and instrumental activities of daily living and in reducing recurrences of depression over 2 years of maintenance treatment. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance trial. SETTING: University clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty older adults aged 65 years and older with recently remitted major depression. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment to maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy and donepezil or to maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy and placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Global neuropsychological performance, cognitive instrumental activities of daily living, and recurrent depression. RESULTS: Donepezil and antidepressant therapy temporarily improved global cognition (treatment × time interaction, F₂,₂₁₆ = 3.78; P = .03), but effect sizes were small (Cohen d = 0.27, group difference at 1 year). A marginal benefit to cognitive instrumental activities of daily living was also observed (treatment × time interaction, F₂,₁₃₇ = 2.94; P = .06). The donepezil group was more likely than the placebo group to experience recurrent major depression (35% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 24%-46%] vs 19% [95% CI, 9%-29%], respectively; log-rank χ² = 3.97; P = .05; hazard ratio = 2.09 [95% CI, 1.00-4.41]). Post hoc subgroup analyses showed that of 57 participants with mild cognitive impairment, 3 of 30 participants (10% [95% CI, 0%-21%]) receiving donepezil and 9 of 27 participants (33% [95% CI, 16%-51%]) receiving placebo had a conversion to dementia over 2 years (Fisher exact test, P = .05). The mild cognitive impairment subgroup had recurrence rates of major depression of 44% with donepezil vs 12% with placebo (likelihood ratio = 4.91; P = .03). The subgroup with normal cognition (n = 73) showed no benefit with donepezil and no increase in recurrence of major depression. CONCLUSIONS: Whether a cholinesterase inhibitor should be used as augmentation in the maintenance treatment of late-life depression depends on a careful weighing of risks and benefits in those with mild cognitive impairment. In cognitively intact patients, donepezil appears to have no clear benefit for preventing progression to mild cognitive impairment or dementia or for preventing recurrence of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00177671.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.184

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]First M Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). Version 2.0 ed 1995 New York State Psychiatric Institute New York
  2. [26]Holm MB Rogers JC Hemphill-Pearson B The performance assessment of self-care skills (PASS) Assessments in Occupational Therapy Mental Health 2008 101 10 SLACK Thorofare, NJ 2nd ed.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Reynolds, C. F., Butters, M. A., Lopez, O., Pollock, B. G., Dew, M. A., Mulsant, B. H., Lenze, E. J., Holm, M., Rogers, J. C., Mazumdar, S., Houck, P. R., Begley, A., Anderson, S., Karp, J. F., Miller, M. D., Whyte, E. M., Stack, J., Gildengers, A., Szanto, K., Bensasi, S., Kaufer, D. I., Kamboh, M. I., & DeKosky, S. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
ORCID
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2011-01-03
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
51
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.184
PMC
PMC3076045
OpenAlex
W2110379660
Cited by
171
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005, KL2TR000146)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R49CE001495)
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG005133, R01AG030653, P50-AG-05133, R01AG022462, R21AG033387, AG 030653)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH072947, R01MH043823, P30MH071944, R01MH037869, R01MH043832, R01MH083660)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (K01EB009724)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
geriatric depression, donepezil, cholinesterase inhibitors, cognitive impairment, instrumental activities of daily living, depression recurrence, mild cognitive impairment, conversion to dementia, antidepressant augmentation, older adults, neuropsychological performance
MeSH terms
Donepezil, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Antidepressive Agents, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Cognition, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Indans, Male, Piperidines, Treatment Outcome, Nootropic Agents, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review