Cited by 66Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effect of an Internet-Delivered Stepped-Care Program vs In-Person Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms in Children and Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Aspvall, Kristina, Andersson, Erik, Melin, Karin, Norlin, Lisa, Eriksson, Viktor, Vigerland, Sarah, Jolstedt, Maral, Silverberg-Mörse, Maria +7 more·2021·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: In most countries, young people with obsessive-compulsive disorder have limited access to specialist cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a first-line treatment. Objective: To investigate whether internet-delivered CBT implemented in a stepped-care model is noninferior to in-person CBT for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder. Design, Setting and Participants: A randomized clinical noninferiority trial conducted at 2 specialist child and adolescent mental health clinics in Sweden. Participants included 152 individuals aged 8 to 17 years with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Enrollment began in October 2017 and ended in May 2019. Follow-up ended in April 2020. Interventions: Participants randomized to the stepped-care group (n = 74) received internet-delivered CBT for 16 weeks. Nonresponders at the 3-month follow-up were then offered a course of traditional face-to-face treatment. Participants randomized to the control group (n = 78) immediately received in-person CBT for 16 weeks. Nonresponders at the 3-month follow-up received additional face-to-face treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the masked assessor-rated Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) score at the 6-month follow-up. The scale includes 10 items rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), yielding a total score range of 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Assessors were masked to treatment allocation at pretreatment, posttreatment, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up assessments. The predefined noninferiority margin was 4 points on the CY-BOCS. Results: Among the 152 randomized participants (mean age, 13.4 years; 94 [62%] females), 151 (99%) completed the trial. At the 3-month follow-up, 34 participants (46%) in the stepped-care group and 23 (30%) in the in-person CBT group were nonresponders. At the 6-month follow-up, the CY-BOCS score was 11.57 points in the stepped-care group vs 10.57 points in the face-to-face treatment group, corresponding to an estimated mean difference of 0.91 points ([1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 3.28]; P for noninferiority = .02). Increased anxiety (30%-36%) and depressive symptoms (20%-28%) were the most frequently reported adverse events in both groups. There were 2 unrelated serious adverse events (1 in each group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder, treatment with an internet-delivered CBT program followed by in-person CBT if necessary compared with in-person CBT alone resulted in a noninferior difference in symptoms at the 6-month follow-up. Further research is needed to understand the durability and generalizability of these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03263546.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2021.3839

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study presents the first stepped-care CBT protocol for childhood anxiety developed for use in a primary care setting.

    “However, to our knowledge, this study presents the first stepped-care CBT protocol for childhood anxiety developed for use in a primary care setting.”

    From Developing a primary care-based cognitive behavioral intervention for anxiety in children through a participatory approach: a qualitative study. (2026) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Abstract describes a stepped-care CBT trial for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder, conducted at two specialist mental health clinics in Sweden—not a childhood-anxiety protocol developed for primary care. The paper also does not establish the claimed ‘first’ status. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aspvall, K., Andersson, E., Melin, K., Norlin, L., Eriksson, V., Vigerland, S., Jolstedt, M., Silverberg-Mörse, M., Wallin, L., Sampaio, F., Feldman, I., Bottai, M., Lenhard, F., Mataix-Cols, D., & Serlachius, E.
Affiliations
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
Corresponding author
Aspvall, Kristina
Venue
JAMA
Published
2021-05-11
Volume
325
Issue
18
Pages
1863
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3160888805
Cited by
66
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
  • Jane och Dan Olssons Stiftelse
  • Region Uppsala
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, stepped care, non-inferiority, treatment non-responders, Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, children and adolescents, access to mental health care, digital mental health interventions, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Sweden, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review