Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 856

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leg Symptoms in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Associated Clinical Characteristics and Functional Impairment

Open access
McGrae McDermott, Mary, Greenland, Philip, Liu, Kiang, Guralnik, Jack M., Criqui, Michael H., Dolan, Nancy C., Chan, Cheeling, Celic, Lillian, Pearce, William H., Schneider, Joseph R., Sharma, Leena, Clark, Elizabeth, Gibson, Daniel, Martin, Gary J.·2001·JAMA
DOI 10.1001/jama.286.13.1599
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

CONTEXT: Persons with lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are often asymptomatic or have leg symptoms other than intermittent claudication (IC). OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical characteristics and functional limitations associated with a broad range of leg symptoms identified among patients with PAD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of 460 men and women with PAD and 130 without PAD, who were identified consecutively, conducted between October 1998 and January 2000 at 3 Chicago-area medical centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ankle-brachial index score of less than 0.90; scores from 6-minute walk, accelerometer-measured physical activity over 7 days, repeated chair raises, standing balance (full tandem stand), 4-m walking velocity, San Diego claudication questionnaire, Geriatric Depression Score Short-Form, and the Walking Impairment Questionnaire. RESULTS: All groups with PAD had poorer functioning than participants without PAD. The following values are for patients without IC vs those with IC. Participants in the group with leg pain on exertion and rest (n = 88) had a higher (poorer) score for neuropathy (5.6 vs 3.5; P<.001), prevalence of diabetes mellitus (48.9% vs 26.7%; P<.001), and spinal stenosis (20.8% vs 7.2%; P =.002). The atypical exertional leg pain/carry on group (exertional leg pain other than IC associated with walking through leg pain [n = 41]) and the atypical exertional leg pain/stop group (exertional leg pain other than IC that causes one to stop walking [n = 90]) had better functioning than the IC group. The group without exertional leg pain/inactive (no exertional leg pain in individual who walks </=6 blocks per week [n = 28]) and the leg pain on exertion and rest group had poorer functioning than those with IC. Adjusting for age, sex, race, and comorbidities and compared with IC, participants with atypical exertional leg pain/carry on achieved a greater distance on the 6-minute walk (404.3 vs 328.5 m; P<.001) and were less likely to stop during the 6-minute walk (6.8% vs 36%; P =.002). The group with pain on exertion and rest had a slower time for completing 5 chair raises (13.5 vs 11.9 seconds; P =.009), completed the tandem stand less frequently (37.5% vs 60.0%; P =.004), and had a slower 4-m walking velocity (0.80 vs 0.90 m/s; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide range of leg symptoms in persons with PAD beyond that of classic IC. Comorbid disease may contribute to these symptoms in PAD. Functional impairments are found in every PAD symptom group, and the degree of functional limitation varies depending on the type of leg symptom.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.286.13.1599

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
McGrae McDermott, M., Greenland, P., Liu, K., Guralnik, J. M., Criqui, M. H., Dolan, N. C., Chan, C., Celic, L., Pearce, W. H., Schneider, J. R., Sharma, L., Clark, E., Gibson, D., & Martin, G. J.
Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2001-10-03
Volume
286
Issue
13
Pages
1599
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
DOI
10.1001/jama.286.13.1599
OpenAlex
W2099489133
Cited by
856
References
2
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.