Cited by 126Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Evaluation of Nutritional Support and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Malnutrition

Open access
Kaegi-Braun, Nina, Mueller, Marlena, Schuetz, Philipp, Mueller, Beat, Kutz, Alexander·2021·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Malnutrition affects a considerable proportion of patients in the hospital and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Recent trials found a survival benefit among patients receiving nutritional support. Objective: To investigate whether there is an association of nutritional support with in-hospital mortality in routine clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted from April 2013 to December 2018 among a population of patients from Swiss administrative claims data. From 114 264 hospitalizations of medical patients with malnutrition, 34 967 patients (30.6%) receiving nutritional support were 1:1 propensity score matched to patients with malnutrition in the hospital who were not receiving nutritional support. Patients in intensive care units were excluded. Data were analyzed from February 2020 to November 2020. Exposures: Receiving nutritional support, including dietary advice, oral nutritional supplementation, or enteral and parenteral nutrition. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day all-cause hospital readmission and discharge to a postacute care facility. Poisson and logistic regressions were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and odds ratios (ORs) of outcomes. Results: After matching, the study identified 69 934 hospitalizations of patients coded as having malnutrition in the cohort (mean [SD] age, 73.8 [14.5] years; 36 776 [52.6%] women). Patients receiving nutritional support, compared with those not receiving nutritional support, had a lower in-hospital mortality rate (2525 of 34 967 patients died [7.2%] vs 3072 of 34 967 patients died [8.8%]; IRR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.75-0.84]; P < .001) and a reduced 30-day readmission rate (IRR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.91-0.98]; P = .002). In addition, patients receiving nutritional support were less frequently discharged to a postacute care facility (13 691 patients [42.2%] vs 14 324 patients [44.9%]; OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.91]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that nutritional support was associated with reduced mortality among patients in the medical ward with malnutrition. The results support data found by randomized clinical trials and may help to inform patients, clinicians, and authorities regarding the usefulness of nutritional support in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33433

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a population-based cohort study of more than 110,000 patients, the effect of nutritional support remained robust in subgroup analyses stratified for main diagnoses and comorbidities.

    “In a population-based cohort study of more than 110,000 patients, effect of nutritional support remained robust in subgroup analyses which stratified for main diagnoses and comorbidities, among others [169] (Level of evidence: 2-).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Cederholm T, Barazzoni R, Austin P, ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36(1): 49- 64. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004 27642056 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Felder S, Lechtenboehmer C, Bally M, Association of nutritional risk and adverse medical outcomes across different medical inpatient populations. Nutrition. 2015; 31(11-12): 1385- 1393. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.06.007 26429660 · DOI
  3. [4]Imoberdorf R, Meier R, Krebs P, Prevalence of undernutrition on admission to Swiss hospitals. Clin Nutr. 2010; 29(1): 38- 41. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.06.005 19573958 · DOI
  4. [5]Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z, Ad Hoc EWG; Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003; 22(3): 321- 336. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5614(02)00214-5 12765673 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Schuetz P “Eat your lunch!” — controversies in the nutrition of the acutely, non-critically ill medical inpatient. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015; 145: w14132. doi: 10.4414/smw.2015.14132 25906253 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Khalatbari-Soltani S, Marques-Vidal P The economic cost of hospital malnutrition in Europe; a narrative review. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2015; 10(3): e89- e94. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2015.04.003 28531387 · DOI
  7. [8]Schuetz P, Greenwald JL Web exclusive. Annals for hospitalists inpatient notes—optimizing inpatient nutrition—why hospitalists should get involved. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 172(4): HO2- HO3. doi: 10.7326/M20-0120 32066166 · DOI
  8. [9]Reber E, Gomes F, Bally L, Schuetz P, Stanga Z Nutritional management of medical inpatients. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(8): 1130. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081130 31366042 PMC6722626 · DOI
  9. [10]Bally MR, Blaser Yildirim PZ, Bounoure L, nutritional support and outcomes in malnourished medical inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176(1): 43- 53. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6587 26720894 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]Mueller C, Compher C, Ellen DM; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011; 35(1): 16- 24. doi: 10.1177/0148607110389335 21224430 · DOI
  11. [16]Gilbert T, Neuburger J, Kraindler J, Development and validation of a hospital frailty risk score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study. Lancet. 2018; 391(10132): 1775- 1782. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30668-8 29706364 PMC5946808 · DOI
  12. [17]Reber E, Gomes F, Vasiloglou MF, Schuetz P, Stanga Z Nutritional risk screening and assessment. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(7): E1065. doi: 10.3390/jcm8071065 31330781 PMC6679209 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [19]Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z; Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003; 22(3): 321- 336. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5614(02)00214-5 12765673 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [20]Vonzun N, Sterchi AB, Imoberdof R, Rhülin M Mangelernährung und DRG—die schweizer lösung. Aktuel Ernahrungsmed. 2014; 39(06): 392- 396. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387435 · DOI
  15. [22]Zhang X, Zhang M-J, Fine J A proportional hazards regression model for the subdistribution with right-censored and left-truncated competing risks data. Stat Med. 2011; 30(16): 1933- 1951. doi: 10.1002/sim.4264 21557288 PMC3408877 · DOI
  16. [23]Gomes F, Baumgartner A, Bounoure L, Association of nutritional support with clinical outcomes among medical inpatients who are malnourished or at nutritional risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(11): e1915138. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15138 31747030 PMC6902795 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [24]Gariballa S, Forster S, Walters S, Powers H A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nutritional supplementation during acute illness. Am J Med. 2006; 119(8): 693- 699. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.12.006 16887416 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [25]Gazzotti C, Arnaud-Battandier F, Parello M, Prevention of malnutrition in older people during and after hospitalisation: results from a randomised controlled clinical trial. Age Ageing. 2003; 32(3): 321- 325. doi: 10.1093/ageing/32.3.321 12720620 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [26]Potter JM, Roberts MA, McColl JH, Reilly JJ Protein energy supplements in unwell elderly patients—a randomized controlled trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001; 25(6): 323- 329. doi: 10.1177/0148607101025006323 11688936 · DOI
  20. [29]Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT,; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012; 307(8): 795- 803. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.137 22307571 PMC3743415 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [30]Khalatbari-Soltani S, Waeber G, Marques-Vidal P Diagnostic accuracy of undernutrition codes in hospital administrative discharge database: improvements needed. Nutrition. 2018; 55-56: 111- 115. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.03.051 29980090 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaegi-Braun, N., Mueller, M., Schuetz, P., Mueller, B., & Kutz, A.
Affiliations
  • Kantonsspital Aarau (CH)
  • Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Kutz, Alexander
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2021-01-20
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
e2033433
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123976730
Cited by
126
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Universität Basel
  • Nestlé Health Science
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (3071410.000.086, 167376)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
malnutrition, nutritional support, in-hospital mortality, hospital readmission, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, oral nutritional supplementation, dietary recommendations, medical inpatients, routine clinical practice, propensity score matching, hospital costs, length of hospital stay, hospital readmission costs
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Patient Readmission, Switzerland, Hospital Mortality, Nutritional Support, Subacute Care, Malnutrition, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review