Cited by 46Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Multimodal neuroimaging of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in a U.S. Population-based sample of school-age children

Open access
Vidal-Ribas, Pablo, Janiri, Delfina, Doucet, Gaelle E., Pornpattananangkul, Narun, Nielson, Dylan M., Frangou, Sophia, Stringaris, Argyris·2021·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Suicide deaths and suicidal thoughts and behaviors are considered a public health emergency, yet their underpinnings in the brain remain elusive. The authors examined the classification accuracy of individual, environmental, and clinical characteristics, as well as multimodal brain imaging correlates, of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in a U.S. population-based sample of school-age children. METHODS: Children ages 9-10 years (N=7,994) from a population-based sample from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study were assessed for lifetime suicidal thoughts and behaviors. After quality control procedures, structural MRI (N=6,238), resting-state functional MRI (N=4,134), and task-based functional MRI (range, N=4,075-4,608) were examined. Differences with Welch's t test and equivalence tests, with observed effect sizes (Cohen's d) and their 90% confidence intervals <|0.15|, were examined. Classification accuracy was examined with area under precision-recall curves (AUPRCs). RESULTS: Among the 7,994 unrelated children (females, N=3,757, 47.0%), those with lifetime suicidal thoughts and behaviors based on child (N=684, 8.6%), caregiver (N=654, 8.2%), and concordant (N=198, 2.5%) reports had higher levels of social adversity and psychopathology, among themselves and their caregivers, compared with never-suicidal children (N=6,854, 85.7%). Only one imaging test survived statistical correction: caregiver-reported suicidal thoughts and behaviors were associated with a thinner left bank of the superior temporal sulcus. On the basis of the prespecified bounds of |0.15|, approximately 48% of the group mean differences for child-reported suicidal thoughts and behaviors comparisons and approximately 22% for caregiver-reported suicidal thoughts and behaviors comparisons were considered equivalent. All observed effect sizes were relatively small (d≤|0.30|), and both non-imaging and imaging correlates had low classification accuracy (AUPRC ≤0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Commonly applied neuroimaging measures did not reveal a discrete brain signature related to suicidal thoughts and behaviors in youths. Improved approaches to the neurobiology of suicide are critically needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20020120

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In children aged 9-10 from the ABCD cohort, suicidal thoughts and behaviors were associated with minimal macroscopic structural differences, aside from a thinner left superior temporal sulcus.

    “In one large pediatric study from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort (14), children aged 9–10 with suicidal thoughts and behaviors showed minimal macroscopic structural differences, aside from a thinner left superior temporal sulcus.”
  • In the ABCD cohort, children aged 9-10 with suicidal thoughts and behaviors showed only minimal macroscopic structural differences.

    “In the ABCD cohort, children aged 9–10 with suicidal thoughts and behaviors showed only minimal macroscopic structural differences (14)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [43]Kobak K, Kratochvil C, Stanger C, Kaufman J: Computerized screening of comorbidity in adolescents with substance or psychiatric disorders. in Poster presented at the 33rd annual anxiety disorders and depression conference, La Jolla, CA Retrieved from http://www.telepsychologynet/resources/KSADS_ADAAPosterv4pdf2013.
  2. [63]Funder DC, Ozer DJ. Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense. 2019; 2: 156– 168.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vidal-Ribas, P., Janiri, D., Doucet, G. E., Pornpattananangkul, N., Nielson, D. M., Frangou, S., & Stringaris, A.
Affiliations
  • Social and Behavioral Science Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Md. (Vidal-Ribas); Section of Clinical and Computational Psychiatry (COMP-ψ), NIMH, Bethesda, Md. (Vidal-Ribas, Pornpattananangkul, Nielson, Stringaris); Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (Janiri, Doucet, Frangou); Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome (Janiri); Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha (Doucet); Department of...
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
178
Issue
4
Pages
321-332
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W3124064148
Cited by
45
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R03AG064001)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH116147, ZIAMH002957, R01MH113619)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA041106, U01DA041120, U01DA041156, U01DA041174, U01DA041048, U24DA041147, U01DA041148, U01DA041022, U01DA041028, U01DA041134, U01DA041025, U24DA041123, U01DA041093, U01DA041089, U01DA041117)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, children, adolescents, neuroimaging, superior temporal sulcus, brain structure, social adversity, psychopathology, caregiver reports, neurobiology of suicide, Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study
MeSH terms
Brain Cortical Thickness, Mental Disorders, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Organ Size, Suicide, Attempted, Temporal Lobe, United States, Suicidal Ideation, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review