Cited by 428Mind wandering and attentionPsychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Frequency, characteristics and functions of future‐oriented thoughts in daily life

Open access
D'Argembeau, Arnaud, Renaud, Olivier, Van der Linden, Martial·2011·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in future‐oriented cognition in various areas of psychology, there is still little empirical data regarding the occurrence and nature of future‐oriented thoughts in daily life. In this study, participants recorded future‐oriented thoughts occurring in natural settings and rated their characteristics and functions. The results show that future‐oriented thoughts occur frequently in daily life and can take different representational formats (more or less abstract), embrace various thematic contents (e.g. work, relationships) and serve a range of functions (e.g. action planning, decision making). The functions and characteristics of thoughts differed according to their temporal distance, with thoughts referring to the near future being more specific and serving action planning to a greater extent than thoughts concerning the far future. The characteristics of future thoughts were also related to affective content, with positive thoughts being more frequent, more specific, and associated with more visual images than negative thoughts. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.1647

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In behavioural studies, everyday inner speech is often reported to be involved in self-awareness, past and future thinking and emotional reflection.

    “In behavioural studies, everyday inner speech is often reported to be involved in self-awareness, past and future thinking and emotional reflection (D’Argembeau et al., 2011; Morin et al., 2011)”

    From The brain's conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech (2016) · cites this paper as D’Argembeau et al., 2011

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports that future-oriented action planning and decision making were associated with more inner speech than daydreams or reassurances. The Discussion (page unavailable) links inner speech to planning and self-regulation. This supports the future-thinking part, but the study does not establish the claimed involvement of everyday inner speech in past thinking or self-awareness, and its findings on reassurances do not support the broad emotional-reflection claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many individuals report experiencing an "inner monologue".

    “many individuals report experiencing an “inner monologue”21–24.”
  • Inner speech experiences are particularly associated with action-planning and decision-making, in contrast to visual forms.

    “Experiences of inner speech were particularly associated with action-planning and decision-making, in contrast to more visual forms of future-oriented cognition.”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as D'Argembeau, Renaud, and Van der Linden, 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd Ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.
  2. Good, P. (1994). Permutation tests: A practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  3. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psycho- logy, 75, 5-18.
  4. MacLeod, A. K., & Byrne, A. (1996). Anxiety, depression, and the anticip- ation of future positive and negative experiences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 286-289.
  5. Morin, A., & Michaud, J. (2007). Self-awareness and the left inferior frontal gyrus: Inner speech use during self-related processing. Brain Research Bulletin, 74, 387-396.
  6. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1992). Thought self-leadership: The influence of self-talk and mental imagery on performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 681-699.
  7. Newby-Clark, I. R., & Ross, M. (2003). Conceiving the past and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 807-818.
  8. Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1198-1212.
  9. Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 250-260.
  10. Robinson, M. D., & Ryff, C. D. (1999). The role of self-deception in the perceptions of past, present, and future happiness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 596-608.
  11. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 39-60.
  12. Szpunar, K. K. (in press). Episodic future thought: An emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
  13. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
  14. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-820.
  15. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 25: 96-103 (2011)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Argembeau, A., Renaud, O., & Van der Linden, M.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
96-103
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W2016067220
Cited by
428
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 22
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
temporal distance, action planning, decision-making, emotional content, visual imagery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review