Cited by 224Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesCognitive Functions and MemoryMind wandering and attention

Solving future problems: default network and executive activity associated with goal-directed mental simulations

Open access
Gerlach, Kathy D., Spreng, R. Nathan, Gilmore, Adrian W., Schacter, Daniel L.·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

Mental simulations are often focused on a goal in the future or a problem to be solved. Recent neuroimaging studies have associated mental simulations of the future with default network activity, but the simulations in these studies were not typically directed toward achieving a particular goal. Goal-directed simulation requires cognitive control to maintain information, make decisions, and coordinate abstract action sequences. Therefore, it should recruit not only the default network, but also executive regions. To investigate whether default network and executive regions can be coactive in the context of goal-directed simulation, we designed a problem-solving task in which participants simulated solving several specific problems in imaginary scenarios while in the MRI scanner. We analyzed brain activity during simulation relative to a semantic elaboration task and found that goal-directed simulation engaged core regions of the default network and executive dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. A functional connectivity analysis with posterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex seeds revealed that activity in these regions was coupled throughout the goal-directed simulation period and associated with a distributed network of other default and executive regions, including medial prefrontal cortex, medial temporal, and parietal regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.030

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The default and control networks have also shown cooperation during several cognitive processes.

    “Importantly, the default and control networks have also shown cooperation during several cognitive processes [8, 17–21].”

    From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [19]

  • The default and control networks cooperate during autobiographical future planning, which involves constructing a detailed and sequential mental representation of a future goal state.

    “For example, the default and control networks show cooperation during autobiographical future planning—constructing a detailed and sequential mental representation about a future goal state [10, 19, 24].”

    From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [19]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Creative thought involves similar cognitive and neural mechanisms as other forms of goal-directed, self-generated cognition, such as autobiographical future planning.

    “We propose that creative thought involves similar cognitive and neural mechanisms as other forms of goal-directed, self-generated cognition (e.g., autobiographical future planning; [10, 19, 24]).”

    From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerlach, K. D., Spreng, R. N., Gilmore, A. W., & Schacter, D. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Gerlach, Kathy D.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1816-1824
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160632445
Cited by
224
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIMH (MH060941)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
mental simulation, default mode network, executive function, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, problem solving, prospection, cognitive control, functional connectivity, posterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, semantic elaboration
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Female, Goals, Humans, Imagination, Problem Solving, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review