Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biophysical evidence to support and extend the vitamin D‐folate hypothesis as a paradigm for the evolution of human skin pigmentation

Lucock, Mark D., Jones, Patrice R., Veysey, Martin, Thota, Rohith, Garg, Manohar, Furst, John, Martin, Charlotte, Yates, Zoe, Scarlett, Christopher J., Jablonski, Nina G., Chaplin, George, Beckett, Emma L.·2022·American Journal of Human Biology

Abstract

Objective: To test the “vitamin D‐folate hypothesis for the evolution of human skin pigmentation.” Methods: Total ozone mapping spectrometer (TOMS) satellite data were used to examine surface UV‐irradiance in a large (n = 649) Australian cross‐sectional study population. Genetic analysis was used to score vitamin D‐ and folate‐related gene polymorphisms (n = 22), along with two pigmentation gene variants (IRF4‐rs12203592/HERC2‐rs12913832). Red cell folate and vitamin D 3 were measured by immunoassay and HPLC, respectively. Results: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and pigmentation genes interact to modify blood vitamin levels; Light skin IRF4‐TT genotype has greatest folate loss while light skin HERC2‐GG genotype has greatest vitamin D 3 synthesis (reflected in both TOMS and seasonal data). UV‐wavelength exhibits a dose–response relationship in folate loss within light skin IRF4‐TT genotype (305 > 310 > 324 > 380 nm). Significant vitamin D 3 photosynthesis only occurs within light skin HERC2‐GG genotype, and is maximal at 305 nm. Three dietary antioxidants (vitamins C, E, and β‐carotene) interact with UVR and pigmentation genes preventing oxidative loss of labile reduced folate vitamers, with greatest benefit in light skin IRF4‐TT subjects. The putative photosensitiser, riboflavin, did not sensitize red cell folate to UVR and actually afforded protection. Four genes (5xSNPs) influenced blood vitamin levels when stratified by pigmentation genotype; MTHFR‐rs1801133/rs1801131, TS‐rs34489327, CYP24A‐rs17216707, and VDR‐ApaI‐rs7975232. Lightest IRF4‐TT/darkest HERC2‐AA genotype combination (greatest folate loss/lowest vitamin D 3 synthesis) has 0% occurrence. The opposing, commonest (39%) compound genotype (darkest IRF4‐CC/lightest HERC2‐GG) permits least folate loss and greatest synthesis of vitamin D 3. Conclusion: New biophysical evidence supports the vitamin D‐folate hypothesis for evolution of skin pigmentation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajhb.23667

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The folate pathway mapping supports the need for DNA repair in light skin and melanin synthesis in dark skin.

    “This supports the need for DNA repair in light skin and melanin synthesis in dark skin.”
  • Recent research has extended the vitamin D-folate evolutionary model by adding the need for folate (and hence BH4) in the synthesis of eumelanin and pheomelanin and by considering UVR-folate-gene and UVR-folate-antioxidant interactions.

    “recent research has extended this evolutionary model; this addendum adds the need for folate (and hence tetrahydrobiopterin [BH4]) in the synthesis of eumelanin (black/brown pigment) and pheomelanin (yellow/red pigment), it also considers relevant UVR‐folate‐gene and UVR‐folate‐antioxidant interactions.”
  • Mapping publicly available gene frequency data to folate metabolism suggests that the effect of variant alleles on folate-dependent one-carbon transfer tends to support the evolutionary model, with the thymidylate cycle favored in a light phototype and the purine cycle favored in a dark phototype.

    “mapping of rsid to metabolism in Figure 4 suggests the effect of variant alleles on folate dependent one‐carbon transfer tends to support the evolutionary model; that is, based on the disposition of polymorphisms, the thymidylate cycle seems to be favored in a light phototype and the purine cycle favored in a dark phototype.”
  • Four genes (5 SNPs) were found to modify blood vitamin levels when stratified by pigmentation genotype: MTHFR-rs1801133/rs1801131, TS-rs34489327, CYP24A1-rs17216707, and VDR-ApaI-rs7975232.

    “four genes (5xSNPs) were found to modify blood vitamin levels when stratified by pigmentation genotype (Lucock et al., 2021). These genes were MTHFR‐rs1801133/rs1801131, TS‐rs34489327, CYP24A1‐rs17216707, and VDR‐ApaI‐rs7975232.”
  • UVB and low UVA (near UVB) wavelengths cause the greatest loss of erythrocyte folate, and this is enhanced in a lighter skin phototype with the IRF4 TT genotype rs12203592.

    “It has recently been shown that UVB and low UVA (near UVB) wavelengths cause the greatest loss of erythrocyte folate, and that this is enhanced in a lighter skin phototype (IRF4 TT genotype—rs12203592)”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1017/S0007114514000178 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/ajhb.23010 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/01635581.2016.1142584 · DOI
  4. 10.1201/9781420055962 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3290 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1210/er.2008-0004 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.010 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.675247 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1097/01.GIM.0000159904.92850.D5 · DOI
  11. 10.3378/027.085.0402 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/jid.2009.258 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10103-011-0895-0 · DOI
  14. 10.1271/bbb.80530 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/humu.20143 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/exd.14142 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.07.024 · DOI
  18. 10.1530/JME-19-0246 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/bjd.13885 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1152/ajpregu.00355.2006 · DOI
  21. 10.1056/NEJMra0804615 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1177/0148607111430189 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.6256855 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/pcmr.12976 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0349 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Jones P.(2020)Vitamin D and folate:Nutrigenetic relationships with environmental ultraviolet radiation[PhD thesis University of Newcastle Australia].
  27. Jones P., 2016, Converging evolutionary, environmental and clinical ideas on Folate metabolism, Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine, 1, 34
  28. 10.1186/s12263-020-00663-3 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.3390/ijerph17051545 · DOI
  30. 10.3390/nu10050554 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1002/ajhb.23079 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.07.030 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.mam.2021.100944 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1002/ajhb.22929 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/nutrit/nuy013 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1002/ajhb.23166 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0271-5317(03)00156-8 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S1096-7192(02)00113-0 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.bbacli.2014.11.005 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/emph/eou013 · DOI
  41. 10.1006/bmme.1995.1030 · DOI
  42. Martin C.(2016)Genotype‐phenotype relationships relevant to the lifecycle with special reference to vitamin nutrition[PhD thesis University of Newcastle Australia].
  43. Martin C. E., 2014, Vitamin D: Genetics, Environment & Health, Journal of Food and Nutritional Disorders, 3, 5
  44. 10.1159/000313854 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.jnim.2016.03.002 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.019 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1038/skinbio.2011.3 · DOI
  50. 10.1086/425285 · DOI
  51. Robinson N., 1966, Solar radiation
  52. 10.1007/s00239-019-09902-7 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.jnim.2016.04.007 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00675.x · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1177/15648265080292S103 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1002/ijc.24003 · DOI
  57. 10.1093/hmg/ddp003 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-248 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1093/ajcn/83.5.993 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1373/49.9.1521 · DOI
  62. 10.1101/gr.128652.111 · DOI
  63. 10.1146/annurev.nu.08.070188.002111 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1152/ajpregu.00136.2019 · DOI
  65. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00501.2018 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1039/c3cc41437j · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lucock, M. D., Jones, P. R., Veysey, M., Thota, R., Garg, M., Furst, J., Martin, C., Yates, Z., Scarlett, C. J., Jablonski, N. G., Chaplin, G., & Beckett, E. L.
Affiliations
  • School of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Newcastle Ourimbah New South Wales Australia
  • Medicine Hull York Medical School Heslington UK
  • Nutraceuticals Research Group University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
  • Maths and Physical Sciences University of Newcastle Ourimbah New South Wales Australia
  • Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy University of Newcastle Ourimbah New South Wales Australia
  • Anthropology Department The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA
Venue
American Journal of Human Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-21
Volume
34
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1042-0533
  • 1520-6300
Cited by
17
References
10
Language
en
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Australian Research Council (G0188386)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review