The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biophysical evidence to support and extend the vitamin D‐folate hypothesis as a paradigm for the evolution of human skin pigmentation
Abstract
Objective: To test the “vitamin D‐folate hypothesis for the evolution of human skin pigmentation.” Methods: Total ozone mapping spectrometer (TOMS) satellite data were used to examine surface UV‐irradiance in a large (n = 649) Australian cross‐sectional study population. Genetic analysis was used to score vitamin D‐ and folate‐related gene polymorphisms (n = 22), along with two pigmentation gene variants (IRF4‐rs12203592/HERC2‐rs12913832). Red cell folate and vitamin D 3 were measured by immunoassay and HPLC, respectively. Results: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and pigmentation genes interact to modify blood vitamin levels; Light skin IRF4‐TT genotype has greatest folate loss while light skin HERC2‐GG genotype has greatest vitamin D 3 synthesis (reflected in both TOMS and seasonal data). UV‐wavelength exhibits a dose–response relationship in folate loss within light skin IRF4‐TT genotype (305 > 310 > 324 > 380 nm). Significant vitamin D 3 photosynthesis only occurs within light skin HERC2‐GG genotype, and is maximal at 305 nm. Three dietary antioxidants (vitamins C, E, and β‐carotene) interact with UVR and pigmentation genes preventing oxidative loss of labile reduced folate vitamers, with greatest benefit in light skin IRF4‐TT subjects. The putative photosensitiser, riboflavin, did not sensitize red cell folate to UVR and actually afforded protection. Four genes (5xSNPs) influenced blood vitamin levels when stratified by pigmentation genotype; MTHFR‐rs1801133/rs1801131, TS‐rs34489327, CYP24A‐rs17216707, and VDR‐ApaI‐rs7975232. Lightest IRF4‐TT/darkest HERC2‐AA genotype combination (greatest folate loss/lowest vitamin D 3 synthesis) has 0% occurrence. The opposing, commonest (39%) compound genotype (darkest IRF4‐CC/lightest HERC2‐GG) permits least folate loss and greatest synthesis of vitamin D 3. Conclusion: New biophysical evidence supports the vitamin D‐folate hypothesis for evolution of skin pigmentation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The folate pathway mapping supports the need for DNA repair in light skin and melanin synthesis in dark skin.
“This supports the need for DNA repair in light skin and melanin synthesis in dark skin.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Recent research has extended the vitamin D-folate evolutionary model by adding the need for folate (and hence BH4) in the synthesis of eumelanin and pheomelanin and by considering UVR-folate-gene and UVR-folate-antioxidant interactions.
“recent research has extended this evolutionary model; this addendum adds the need for folate (and hence tetrahydrobiopterin [BH4]) in the synthesis of eumelanin (black/brown pigment) and pheomelanin (yellow/red pigment), it also considers relevant UVR‐folate‐gene and UVR‐folate‐antioxidant interactions.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Mapping publicly available gene frequency data to folate metabolism suggests that the effect of variant alleles on folate-dependent one-carbon transfer tends to support the evolutionary model, with the thymidylate cycle favored in a light phototype and the purine cycle favored in a dark phototype.
“mapping of rsid to metabolism in Figure 4 suggests the effect of variant alleles on folate dependent one‐carbon transfer tends to support the evolutionary model; that is, based on the disposition of polymorphisms, the thymidylate cycle seems to be favored in a light phototype and the purine cycle favored in a dark phototype.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Four genes (5 SNPs) were found to modify blood vitamin levels when stratified by pigmentation genotype: MTHFR-rs1801133/rs1801131, TS-rs34489327, CYP24A1-rs17216707, and VDR-ApaI-rs7975232.
“four genes (5xSNPs) were found to modify blood vitamin levels when stratified by pigmentation genotype (Lucock et al., 2021). These genes were MTHFR‐rs1801133/rs1801131, TS‐rs34489327, CYP24A1‐rs17216707, and VDR‐ApaI‐rs7975232.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
UVB and low UVA (near UVB) wavelengths cause the greatest loss of erythrocyte folate, and this is enhanced in a lighter skin phototype with the IRF4 TT genotype rs12203592.
“It has recently been shown that UVB and low UVA (near UVB) wavelengths cause the greatest loss of erythrocyte folate, and that this is enhanced in a lighter skin phototype (IRF4 TT genotype—rs12203592)”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Individuals with the lightest IRF4-TT/darkest HERC2-AA genotype combination, with greatest folate loss and lowest vitamin D3 synthesis, had a 0% occurrence; the opposing commonest compound genotype, darkest IRF4-CC/lightest HERC2-GG, had a 39% occurrence.
“Individuals with the lightest IRF4‐TT/darkest HERC2‐AA genotype combination (greatest folate loss/lowest vitamin D3 synthesis) had a 0% occurrence. By contrast, the opposing, commonest compound genotype (darkest IRF4‐CC/lightest HERC2‐GG) had a 39% occurrence.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
UVR and pigmentation genes interacted to alter blood vitamin levels; the light skin IRF4-TT genotype showed the highest folate loss while the light skin HERC2-GG genotype had the highest vitamin D3 synthesis.
“UVR and pigmentation genes interacted to alter blood vitamin levels; the light skin IRF4‐TT genotype showed the highest folate loss while light skin HERC2‐GG genotype had the highest vitamin D3 synthesis.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Riboflavin does not sensitize erythrocyte folate to UVR and actually affords anti-oxidative protection toward folate.
“recent research shows that riboflavin, does not sensitize erythrocyte folate to UVR, and actually affords anti‐oxidative protection toward folate”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Collectively, the above findings provide new biophysical evidence to support and extend the vitamin D-folate hypothesis for the evolution of skin pigmentation.
“Collectively, the above findings (Lucock et al., 2021) provide new biophysical evidence to support and extend the vitamin D‐folate hypothesis for the evolution of skin pigmentation.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Statistically significant vitamin D3 photosynthesis only occurred in individuals with the light skin HERC2-GG genotype and was maximal at 305 nm.
“Statistically significant vitamin D3 photosynthesis only occurred in individuals with the light skin HERC2‐GG genotype and was maximal at 305 nm.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
UV wavelength exhibited a dose-response relationship with respect to folate loss in individuals with the light skin IRF4-TT genotype, with 305 > 310 > 324 > 380 nm.
“UV‐wavelength exhibited a dose–response relationship with respect to folate loss in individuals with the light skin IRF4‐TT genotype (305 > 310 > 324 > 380 nm).”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Folate metabolism is challenged most in light skin phototypes in high UV regimes; IRF4 genotype, MTHFR genotype, and folate act together in a contemporary population, and historically may have acted to drive the evolution of skin pigmentation phenotype as an adaptive mechanism to the prevailing UV exposome.
“Folate metabolism is challenged most in light skin phototypes in high UV regimes. IRF4 genotype, MTHFR genotype, and folate act together in a contemporary population, and hence, historically, may have acted to drive the evolution of skin pigmentation phenotype as an adaptive mechanism to the prevailing UV exposome.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Three dietary antioxidant vitamins (vitamins C, E, and β-carotene) interacted with UVR and pigmentation genes to prevent oxidative loss of highly labile reduced erythrocyte folate vitamers, with the greatest benefit to individuals with the light skin IRF4-TT genotype.
“three dietary antioxidant vitamins (vitamins C, E, and β‐carotene) interacted with UVR and pigmentation genes to prevent oxidative loss of highly labile reduced erythrocyte folate vitamers. The greatest benefit was to individuals with the light skin IRF4‐TT genotype.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Recent evidence strongly supports the vitamin D-folate evolutionary model.
“Although hard evidence is now beginning to emerge that strongly supports the vitamin D‐folate evolutionary model (Lucock et al., 2021)”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
The study by Lucock and colleagues examines a population that for the most part exhibits an environmentally maladapted pigmentation phenotype because it gathers data from individuals of mostly European ancestry living in a very high UVR regime in Australia.
“Furthermore, the latter study by Lucock and colleagues examines a population that for the most part, exhibits an environmentally “maladapted” pigmentation phenotype since it gathers data from individuals of mostly European ancestry living in a very high UVR regime in Australia.”
From The evolution of human skin pigmentation: A changing medley of vitamins, genetic variability, and UV radiation during human expansion (2023) · cites this paper as Lucock et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
The evolution of human skin coloration
Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2000) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0403 · Cited by 1,212
Self-citationHuman skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation
Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914628107 · Cited by 728
Self-citationThe evolution of human skin and skin color
Jablonski, N. G. (2004) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143955 · Cited by 367
Self-citationLao, O., de Gruijter, J. M., van Duijn, K., Navarro, A., & Kayser, M. (2007) · Annals of Human Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00341.x · Cited by 231
A polymorphism in IRF4 affects human pigmentation through a tyrosinase-dependent MITF/TFAP2A pathway
Praetorius, C., Grill, C., Stacey, S. N., Metcalf, A. M., Gorkin, D. U., Robinson, K. C., Van Otterloo, E., Kim, R. S. Q., Bergsteinsdottir, K., Ogmundsdottir, M. H., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.022 · Cited by 228
An Unexpectedly Complex Architecture for Skin Pigmentation in Africans
Martin, A. R., Lin, M., Granka, J. M., Myrick, J. W., Liu, X., Sockell, A., Atkinson, E. G., Werely, C. J., Möller, M., Sandhu, M. S., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.015 · Cited by 156
Regulation of Tetrahydrobiopterin Synthesis and Bioavailability in Endothelial Cells
Shi, W., Meininger, C. J., Haynes, T. E., Hatakeyama, K., & Wu, G. (2004) · Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1385/cbb:41:3:415 · Cited by 137
Biological Perspectives on Human Pigmentation
Robins, A. H. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511600463 · Cited by 106
Why do blue-eyed men prefer women with the same eye color?
Laeng, B., Mathisen, R., & Johnsen, J.-A. (2006) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0266-1 · Cited by 68
5-Methyltetrahydrofolate is photosensitive in the presence of riboflavin
Steindal, A. H., Tam, T. T. T., Lu, X. Y., Juzeniene, A., & Moan, J. (2008) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/b718907a · Cited by 52
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- 10.1017/S0007114514000178 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajhb.23010 · DOI
- 10.1080/01635581.2016.1142584 · DOI
- 10.1201/9781420055962 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3290 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1210/er.2008-0004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.010 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.675247 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/01.GIM.0000159904.92850.D5 · DOI
- 10.3378/027.085.0402 · DOI
- 10.1038/jid.2009.258 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10103-011-0895-0 · DOI
- 10.1271/bbb.80530 · DOI
- 10.1002/humu.20143 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/exd.14142 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.07.024 · DOI
- 10.1530/JME-19-0246 · DOI
- 10.1111/bjd.13885 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/ajpregu.00355.2006 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMra0804615 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0148607111430189 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.6256855 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/pcmr.12976 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2016.0349 · DOI · Paper page
- Jones P.(2020)Vitamin D and folate:Nutrigenetic relationships with environmental ultraviolet radiation[PhD thesis University of Newcastle Australia].
- Jones P., 2016, Converging evolutionary, environmental and clinical ideas on Folate metabolism, Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine, 1, 34
- 10.1186/s12263-020-00663-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/ijerph17051545 · DOI
- 10.3390/nu10050554 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajhb.23079 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.07.030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mam.2021.100944 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajhb.22929 · DOI
- 10.1093/nutrit/nuy013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajhb.23166 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0271-5317(03)00156-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1096-7192(02)00113-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbacli.2014.11.005 · DOI
- 10.1093/emph/eou013 · DOI
- 10.1006/bmme.1995.1030 · DOI
- Martin C.(2016)Genotype‐phenotype relationships relevant to the lifecycle with special reference to vitamin nutrition[PhD thesis University of Newcastle Australia].
- Martin C. E., 2014, Vitamin D: Genetics, Environment & Health, Journal of Food and Nutritional Disorders, 3, 5
- 10.1159/000313854 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jnim.2016.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/skinbio.2011.3 · DOI
- 10.1086/425285 · DOI
- Robinson N., 1966, Solar radiation
- 10.1007/s00239-019-09902-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jnim.2016.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00675.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/15648265080292S103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ijc.24003 · DOI
- 10.1093/hmg/ddp003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-248 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ajcn/83.5.993 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1373/49.9.1521 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.128652.111 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.nu.08.070188.002111 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/ajpregu.00136.2019 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00501.2018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/c3cc41437j · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lucock, M. D. (2023) · American Journal of Biological Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24564 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucock, M. D., Jones, P. R., Veysey, M., Thota, R., Garg, M., Furst, J., Martin, C., Yates, Z., Scarlett, C. J., Jablonski, N. G., Chaplin, G., & Beckett, E. L.
- Affiliations
- School of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Newcastle Ourimbah New South Wales Australia
- Medicine Hull York Medical School Heslington UK
- Nutraceuticals Research Group University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
- Maths and Physical Sciences University of Newcastle Ourimbah New South Wales Australia
- Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy University of Newcastle Ourimbah New South Wales Australia
- Anthropology Department The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA
- ORCID
- Lucock, Mark D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Human Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-08-21
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1042-0533
- 1520-6300
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 10
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Australian Research Council (G0188386)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review