Cited by 258Connective tissue disorders researchDermatological and Skeletal DisordersGenomics and Rare Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 253 of the 253 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 72 of the 272 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes, rare types

Open access

Abstract

The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes comprise a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of heritable connective tissue disorders, which are characterized by joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility, and tissue friability. Advances in molecular testing have made it possible to now identify the causative mutation for many patients presenting these phenotypes.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review compiles clinical, molecular, and management information on rare Ehlers–Danlos syndrome subtypes, organized around newly recognized entities and their gene defects. It stresses that most of these conditions are ultra-rare, with limited natural history data, few specific treatments, and a need for registries, functional variant testing, and outcome studies.

Key findings

  • Rare EDS types are grouped by molecular and clinical overlap: for example, *COL1A1* p.(Arg312Cys) is placed within classical EDS with vascular fragility; tenascin-X deficiency causes classical-like EDS; biallelic *COL1A2* defects cause cardiac-valvular EDS; exon 6 mutations in *COL1A1* or *COL1A2* cause arthrochalasia EDS; *ADAMTS2* defects cause dermatosparaxis EDS; *PLOD1* or *FKBP14* defects cause kyphoscoliotic EDS; *ZNF469* or *PRDM5* defects cause brittle cornea syndrome; *B4GALT7*, *B3GALT6*, or *SLC39A13* defects cause spondylodysplastic EDS; *CHST14* or *DSE* defects cause musculocontractural EDS; *COL12A1* defects cause myopathic EDS; and *C1R* or *C1S* defects cause periodontal EDS.
  • Reported patient numbers vary widely: 24 patients with complete tenascin-X deficiency; 49 arthrochalasia EDS patients from 36 families; 15 dermatosparaxis EDS patients from 14 families; 84 kyphoscoliotic EDS-PLOD1 patients from 73 families; 10 kyphoscoliotic EDS-FKBP14 patients from 9 families; 51 brittle cornea syndrome patients (32 with *ZNF469* and 19 with *PRDM5* variants); 7 spEDS-B4GALT7 patients from 6 families; 47 spEDS-B3GALT6 patients from 36 families; 8 spEDS-SLC39A13 patients from 3 families; 39 CHST14-related musculocontractural EDS patients from 26 families; 9 myopathic EDS patients from 5 families; and periodontal EDS was studied in 19 families comprising 107 individuals, with *C1R* variants in 15 families and *C1S* variants in 2 families.
  • Hallmark features differ by subtype: vascular fragility in *COL1A1* p.(Arg312Cys)-associated classical EDS; absence of typical atrophic scarring and autosomal recessive inheritance in tenascin-X-deficient classical-like EDS; severe cardiac-valvular disease in cardiac-valvular EDS; congenital bilateral hip dislocation in arthrochalasia EDS; extreme skin fragility and bruising in dermatosparaxis EDS; kyphoscoliosis and muscle hypotonia in kyphoscoliotic EDS; corneal thinning and perforation risk in brittle cornea syndrome; short stature, radio-ulnar synostosis, and intellectual disability in spEDS-B4GALT7; and early-onset periodontitis with pretibial plaques in periodontal EDS.
  • Management is largely extrapolated from other EDS forms, with subtype-specific surveillance recommended for vascular, cardiac, ocular, skeletal, dental, and pregnancy-related risks; no curative treatments are described.

Methods

  • Narrative review and synthesis of published literature, case reports, case series, and cohort studies on rare EDS types; no new primary patient data are generated.
  • For each subtype, the authors summarize historical descriptions, disease mechanisms, allelic heterogeneity, clinical features, genotype–phenotype correlations, penetrance, management, and differential diagnosis.
  • Patient counts and clinical frequencies are drawn from cited reports and registries, including some unpublished or cohort data.

Limitations

  • Stated: the paper notes that pathophysiological understanding remains very limited, genetic discoveries have not yet translated into better clinical management, and future work is needed on natural history, quality of life, international registries, genotype–phenotype correlations, prevalence, clinical variability, age-dependent organ involvement, pregnancy outcomes, biomarkers, functional tests for variants of unknown significance, and therapeutic targets.
  • Evident from the text: many conclusions rest on very small numbers of patients, retrospective case reports, and heterogeneous reporting; several subtypes lack genotype–phenotype correlations; prevalence is often unknown; and management guidance is frequently extrapolated from other EDS types rather than supported by subtype-specific evidence.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.c.31550

Cites

253 of 253 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

72 of 272 cited sources checked · 42 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 100
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 192
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 9
279 of 279
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Penetrance of TNX-deficient classical-like EDS is high.

    “We assume that penetrance is high, but the research to support this assumption is lacking.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All mutations in the condition under discussion result in complete absence of the proa2(I) chains.

    “All mutations result in complete absence of the proa2(I) chains.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Penetrance of the condition under discussion is complete.

    “Penetrance is presumably complete.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Penetrance of arthrochalasia EDS is complete.

    “Penetrance is complete.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Penetrance of dermatosparaxis EDS is complete.

    “Penetrance is presumably complete.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Penetrance of kEDS-PLOD1 is complete.

    “Penetrance is complete.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Penetrance in kEDS-FKBP14 is complete.

    “Penetrance is presumably complete.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Penetrance in BCS is complete.

    “Penetrance is presumably complete.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Penetrance in spEDS-B4GALT7 is complete.

    “Penetrance is presumably complete.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Penetrance is complete for spEDS-B3GALT6.

    “Penetrance is complete.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Obligate carriers of spEDS-B3GALT6 display no overt clinical symptoms.

    “Obligate carriers display no overt clinical symptoms.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Penetrance is presumably complete for spEDS-SLC39A13.

    “Penetrance is presumably complete.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Obligate carriers of spEDS-SLC39A13 have no overt phenotype.

    “Obligate carriers have no overt phenotype.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many variants of unknown significance are being identified with the advent of next-generation sequencing techniques.

    “With the advent of next-generation sequencing techniques, many variants of unknown significance are being identified.”
14 of 14

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Sex counts exceed the stated patient total

    Minor

    The reported two females and five males add up to seven patients, not six.

    Reported 6 · recomputed 7

  • B3GALT6 is said to add a nonexistent third linker galactose

    Minor

    The mechanism describes addition of a third galactose, but the paper elsewhere defines the linker as containing only two galactoses.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 248 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Avgitidou G, 2015, Brittle cornea syndrome: Case report with novel mutation in the PRDM5 gene and review of the literature, Case Rep Ophthalmol Med, 2015, 637084
  2. 10.1136/ard.29.3.332 · DOI
  3. Lapiere CM, 1981, Ehlers–Danlos (Ed) type‐VIII skin has a reduced proportion of collagen type‐III, J Invest Dermatol, 76, 422

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Brady, A. F., Demirdas, S., Fournel‐Gigleux, S., Ghali, N., Giunta, C., Kapferer‐Seebacher, I., Kosho, T., Mendoza‐Londono, R., Pope, M. F., Rohrbach, M., Van Damme, T., Vandersteen, A., van Mourik, C., Voermans, N., Zschocke, J., & Malfait, F.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Ingénierie Moléculaire, Cellulaire et Physiopathologie (FR)
  • Northwick Park Hospital (GB)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • Shinshu University Hospital (JP)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03
Volume
175
Issue
1
Pages
70-115
ISSN
  • 1552-4868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4876
OpenAlex
W2595109880
Cited by
258
References
248
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 8
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation
  • The Ehlers-Danlos Support UK
  • The Ehlers-Danlos Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, connective tissue diseases, joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility, extracellular matrix genes, collagen defects, genetic testing, molecular diagnosis
MeSH terms
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Mutation, Genetic Heterogeneity, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review