Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy

Stepan, Katelyn, Zeiger, Joshua, Hanchuk, Stephanie, Del Signore, Anthony, Shrivastava, Raj, Govindaraj, Satish, Iloreta, Alfred·2017·International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology

Abstract

Background: Three‐dimensional (3D) computer modeling and interactive virtual reality (VR) simulation are validated teaching techniques used throughout medical disciplines. Little objective data exists supporting its use in teaching clinical anatomy. Learner motivation is thought to limit the rate of utilization of such novel technologies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness, satisfaction, and motivation associated with immersive VR simulation in teaching medical students neuroanatomy. Methods: Images of normal cerebral anatomy were reconstructed from human Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) computed tomography (CT) imaging and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into 3D VR formats compatible with the Oculus Rift VR System, a head‐mounted display with tracking capabilities allowing for an immersive VR experience. The ventricular system and cerebral vasculature were highlighted and labeled to create a focused interactive model. We conducted a randomized controlled study with 66 medical students (33 in both the control and experimental groups). Pertinent neuroanatomical structures were studied using either online textbooks or the VR interactive model, respectively. We then evaluated the students’ anatomy knowledge, educational experience, and motivation (using the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey [IMMS], a previously validated assessment). Results: There was no significant difference in anatomy knowledge between the 2 groups on preintervention, postintervention, or retention quizzes. The VR group found the learning experience to be significantly more engaging, enjoyable, and useful (all p < 0.01) and scored significantly higher on the motivation assessment (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Immersive VR educational tools awarded a more positive learner experience and enhanced student motivation. However, the technology was equally as effective as the traditional text books in teaching neuroanatomy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alr.21986

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:1<55::AID-CA8>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/ase.117 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1056/NEJMp048100 · doi:10.1056/nejmp048100
  4. 10.1002/1098-2353(200101)14:1<90::AID-CA1014>3.0.CO;2-X · doi:10.1002/1098-2353(200101)14:1<90::aid-ca1014>3.0.co;2-x
  5. 10.1002/ca.20359 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.aanat.2007.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/ase.186 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/ase.139 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.005 · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.005
  10. 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32814b0802 · doi:10.1097/moo.0b013e32814b0802
  11. 10.1080/08923640802239962 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/08923640109527092 · DOI
  13. Serwatka JA., 2005, Improving retention in distance learning classes, International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 2, 59
  14. 10.1007/BF02504998 · DOI
  15. 10.3102/00028312016004375 · doi:10.3102/00028312016004375 · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00690.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Keller JM., 1999, Motivation in cyber learning environments, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 7
  18. 10.1080/01587910802154970 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Chang M, 2003, Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: an experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model, CALICO Journal, 20, 81, 10.1558/cj.v20i1.81-98 · DOI
  20. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181baf56d · DOI
  21. Jang KS, 2005, Effects of a web‐based teaching method on undergraduate nursing students’ learning of electrocardiography, J Nurs Educ, 44, 35, 10.3928/01484834-20050101-07 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.11.007 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.026 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02611.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1097/00001888-200210001-00030 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hu A, 2010, Evaluation of a three‐dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction, J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 39, 315
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01897.x · DOI
  28. 10.1001/archoto.2011.76 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S0022215111002830 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.076 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.076
  31. 10.1177/194589240602000211 · doi:10.1177/194589240602000211
  32. 10.1002/ca.10067 · doi:10.1002/ca.10067
  33. Riva G, 2015, Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 3
  34. 10.1227/01.neu.0000279734.22931.21 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/neurosurgery/46.1.118 · doi:10.1093/neurosurgery/46.1.118
  36. 10.1055/s-2006-931620 · doi:10.1055/s-2006-931620
  37. 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Chandler C, 2007, Effective use of educational technology in medical education

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
Stepan, K., Zeiger, J., Hanchuk, S., Del Signore, A., Shrivastava, R., Govindaraj, S., & Iloreta, A.
Venue
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-18
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1006-1013
ISSN
  • 2042-6976 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-6984
OpenAlex
W2738549128
Cited by
402
References
5
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
Surgical Theater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/alr.21986
The paper
Stepan, K., Zeiger, J., Hanchuk, S., Del Signore, A., Shrivastava, R., Govindaraj, S., & Iloreta, A. (2017). Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21986

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.