Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endogenous amyloid‐β is necessary for hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory

Puzzo, Daniela, Privitera, Lucia, Fa', Mauro, Staniszewski, Agnieszka, Hashimoto, Gakuji, Aziz, Fahad, Sakurai, Mikako, Ribe, Elena M., Troy, Carol M., Mercken, Marc, Jung, Sonia S., Palmeri, Agostino, Arancio, Ottavio·2011·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the role of endogenous amyloid‐β peptide (Aβ) in healthy brain. Methods: Long‐term potentiation (LTP), a type of synaptic plasticity that is thought to be associated with learning and memory, was examined through extracellular field recordings from the CA1 region of hippocampal slices, whereas behavioral techniques were used to assess contextual fear memory and reference memory. Amyloid precursor protein (APP) expression was reduced through small interfering RNA (siRNA) technique. Results: We found that both antirodent Aβ antibody and siRNA against murine APP reduced LTP as well as contextual fear memory and reference memory. These effects were rescued by the addition of human Aβ 42, suggesting that endogenously produced Aβ is needed for normal LTP and memory. Furthermore, the effect of endogenous Aβ on plasticity and memory was likely due to regulation of transmitter release, activation of α7‐containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, and Aβ 42 production. Interpretation: Endogenous Aβ 42 is a critical player in synaptic plasticity and memory within the normal central nervous system. This needs to be taken into consideration when designing therapies aiming at reducing Aβ levels to treat Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol 2011;

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.22313

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Masliah E., 1995, Mechanisms of synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease, Histol Histopathol, 10, 509
  2. 10.1097/00001756-199710200-00006 · DOI
  3. 10.1152/jn.2001.85.2.708 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0014-2999(99)00601-9 · DOI
  5. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-04-01327.2001 · DOI
  6. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5291-04.2005 · DOI
  7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05703.2001 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.172504199 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nn1372 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.0602896103 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(20000401)60:1<65::AID-JNR7>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1023/A:1023251005197 · DOI
  13. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000192107.17175.39 · DOI
  14. 10.1242/jcs.113.11.1857 · DOI
  15. 10.1074/jbc.M310001200 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1074/jbc.M208110200 · DOI
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05531.2003 · DOI
  18. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0974-04.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.028 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00124-7 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01556.x · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02369-2 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/emboj/20.23.6877 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF00238949 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90066-3 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00645-9 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01204-0 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00410-2 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90073-X · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00211-8 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400391 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4656 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.0603997104 · DOI
  35. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-07.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.04.011 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/379074a0 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07116.x · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s12035-008-8037-9 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1074/jbc.275.8.5626 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04444.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-17-06740.2003 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.12.015 · DOI
  44. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6159-08.2009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Puzzo, D., Privitera, L., Fa', M., Staniszewski, A., Hashimoto, G., Aziz, F., Sakurai, M., Ribe, E. M., Troy, C. M., Mercken, M., Jung, S. S., Palmeri, A., & Arancio, O.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-06
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
819-830
ISSN
  • 0364-5134
  • 1531-8249
Cited by
278
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review