Cited by 62Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyDigital Games and Media

Video gaming in school children: How much is enough?

Open access
Pujol, Jesus, Fenoll, Raquel, Forns, Joan, Harrison, Ben J., Martínez‐Vilavella, Gerard, Macià, Dídac, Alvarez‐Pedrerol, Mar, Blanco‐Hinojo, Laura +3 more·2016·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite extensive debate, the proposed benefits and risks of video gaming in young people remain to be empirically clarified, particularly as regards an optimal level of use. METHODS: In 2,442 children aged 7 to 11 years, we investigated relationships between weekly video game use, selected cognitive abilities, and conduct-related problems. A large subgroup of these children (n = 260) was further examined with magnetic resonance imaging approximately 1 year later to assess the impact of video gaming on brain structure and function. RESULTS: Playing video games for 1 hour per week was associated with faster and more consistent psychomotor responses to visual stimulation. Remarkably, no further change in motor speed was identified in children playing >2 hours per week. By comparison, the weekly time spent gaming was steadily associated with conduct problems, peer conflicts, and reduced prosocial abilities. These negative implications were clearly visible only in children at the extreme of our game-playing distribution, with 9 hours or more of video gaming per week. At a neural level, changes associated with gaming were most evident in basal ganglia white matter and functional connectivity. INTERPRETATION: Significantly better visuomotor skills can be seen in school children playing video games, even with relatively small amounts of use. Frequent weekly use, by contrast, was associated with conduct problems. Further studies are needed to determine whether moderate video gaming causes improved visuomotor skills and whether excessive video gaming causes conduct problems, or whether children who already have these characteristics simply play more video games. Ann Neurol 2016;80:424-433.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24745

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents who engage in video gaming for a moderate, consistent amount of time have been shown to exhibit greater processing speed and sustained attention compared to their non-gaming peers.

    “For example, adolescents who engage in video gaming for a moderate, consistent amount of time have been shown to exhibit greater processing speed and sustained attention compared to their non-gaming peers [29–31].”

    From Health Benefits of Video Games in Adolescents and Young Adults (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Behavioral results (page not supplied) report faster and more consistent motor responses among gamers than non-gamers, with much of the advantage observed at one hour per week. They also report no effects on specific attentional features, so sustained attention is not supported. The study examined children aged 7–11, not adolescents, and its single measurement of gaming time does not establish consistent gaming over time. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sunyer J. Esnaola M, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, et al. Traffic-related air pollution in schools impairs cognitive development in primary school children. PLoS Med. 2015;2: e1001792.
  2. Pujol, J., Fenoll, R., Forns, J., Harrison, B. J., Martinez-Vilavella, G., Macia, D., Alvarez- Pedrerol, M., Blanco-Hinojo, L., Gonzalez-Ortiz, S., Deus, J. & Sunyer, J. (2016). Video gaming in school children: How much is enough?. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 80 (3), pp.424-433. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24745. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/291638

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pujol, J., Fenoll, R., Forns, J., Harrison, B. J., Martínez‐Vilavella, G., Macià, D., Alvarez‐Pedrerol, M., Blanco‐Hinojo, L., González‐Ortiz, S., Deus, J., & Sunyer, J.
Affiliations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital del Mar Barcelona Spain
  • Hospital Del Mar (ES)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Center for Research in Environmental Epidemiology Barcelona Spain
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-22
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
424-433
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2475522276
Cited by
62
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8
FWCI
20.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council (268479)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
video gaming, elementary school students, visuomotor skills, conduct problems, peer conflict, prosocial behavior, functional connectivity, brain structure, excessive gaming
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Basal Ganglia, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Peer Group, Psychomotor Performance, Sleep, Time Factors, Video Games, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Connectome, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review