CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 238biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysisAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chemoselective Polymerization Control: From Mixed‐Monomer Feedstock to Copolymers

Open access
Romain, Charles, Williams, Charlotte K.·2014·Angewandte Chemie International Edition
DOI 10.1002/anie.201309575PMC PMC4232277
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A novel chemoselective polymerization control yields predictable (co)polymer compositions from a mixture of monomers. Using a dizinc catalyst and a mixture of caprolactone, cyclohexene oxide, and carbon dioxide enables the selective preparation of either polyesters or polycarbonates or copoly(ester‐carbonates). The selectivity depends on the nature of the zinc–oxygen functionality at the growing polymer chain end, and can be controlled by the addition of exogeneous switch reagents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.201309575

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 ROP and ROCOP, the switch mechanisms, and the structure of catalyst 1.
Figure 1 ROP and ROCOP, the switch mechanisms, and the structure of catalyst 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Chemoselective polymerization control. a) 1/CHO/CL=1:900:100, 80 °C, 16 h. Gases (CO2 or N2) are added to 1 bar total pressure.
Figure 2 Chemoselective polymerization control. a) 1/CHO/CL=1:900:100, 80 °C, 16 h. Gases (CO2 or N2) are added to 1 bar total pressure.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Changes in the intensity of IR resonances (normalized) during the reaction in Figure 2, LHS (Table 1, run 3). The mixture of CL and CHO under CO2 (1 atm) shows only the formation of PCHC, with no PCL formation.
Figure 3 Changes in the intensity of IR resonances (normalized) during the reaction in Figure 2, LHS (Table 1, run 3). The mixture of CL and CHO under CO2 (1 atm) shows only the formation of PCHC, with no PCL formation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Chemoselective polymerization control, illustrating the importance of the zinc-oxygen chain end groups. The selectivity can be rationalized if the relative rates are: k1≈k1′>k3≫k2. Where [Zn] [Zn] is defined in Figure 1 and R=growing polymer chain (PCHC/PCL/copolymer).
Figure 4 Chemoselective polymerization control, illustrating the importance of the zinc-oxygen chain end groups. The selectivity can be rationalized if the relative rates are: k1≈k1′>k3≫k2. Where [Zn] [Zn] is defined in Figure 1 and R=growing polymer chain (PCHC/PCL/copolymer).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Changes to the intensity of IR resonances during PCL-PCHC formation (Table 1, run 5). The plot shows the ROP of CL, the addition of CO2, and the ROCOP of CHO/CO2.
Figure 5 Changes to the intensity of IR resonances during PCL-PCHC formation (Table 1, run 5). The plot shows the ROP of CL, the addition of CO2, and the ROCOP of CHO/CO2.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Changes to the intensity of IR resonances for PCHC-PCL formation (Table 1, run 6). The plot shows the ROCOP of CHO/CO2, the removal of CO2 and the ROP of CL.
Figure 6 Changes to the intensity of IR resonances for PCHC-PCL formation (Table 1, run 6). The plot shows the ROCOP of CHO/CO2, the removal of CO2 and the ROP of CL.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Darensbourg D. J., 2012, Synthetic Biodegradable Polymers, Adv. Polym. Sci., 1
  2. 10.1021/ma051859 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 238

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Romain, C., & Williams, C. K.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Williams, Charlotte K.
ORCID
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-22
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
1607-1610
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
DOI
10.1002/anie.201309575
PMC
PMC4232277
OpenAlex
W1995353352
Cited by
238
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/C544838/1, EP/K035274/1, EP/C544846/1, EP/K014676/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Keywords
ε-caprolactone, cyclohexene oxide, carbon dioxide, polyesters, polycarbonate, copolymer composition control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review