Cited by 410CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Stability of Residual Oxides in Oxide‐Derived Copper Catalysts for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Investigated with 18O Labeling

Open access
Lum, Yanwei, Ager, Joel W.·2018·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

Oxide‐derived (OD) Cu catalysts have high selectivity towards the formation of multi‐carbon products (C 2/C 3) for aqueous electrochemical CO 2 reduction (CO 2 R). It has been proposed that a large fraction of the initial oxide can be surprisingly resistant to reduction, and these residual oxides play a crucial catalytic role. The stability of residual oxides was investigated by synthesizing 18 O‐enriched OD Cu catalysts and testing them for CO 2 R. These catalysts maintain a high selectivity towards C 2/C 3 products (ca. 60 %) for up to 5 h in 0.1 m KHCO 3 at −1.0 V vs. RHE. However, secondary‐ion mass spectrometry measurements show that only a small fraction (<1 %) of the original 18 O content remains, showing that residual oxides are not present in significant amounts during CO 2 R. Furthermore, we show that OD Cu can reoxidize rapidly, which could compromise the accuracy of ex situ methods for determining the true oxygen content.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.201710590

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. C. Graves, S. D. Ebbesen, M. Mogensen, K. S. Lackner, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1-23.
  2. Y. Hori, in Mod. Asp. Electrochem. (Eds.: C.G. Vayenas, R.E. White, M.E. Gamboa-Aldeco), Springer New York, New York, NY, 2008, pp. 89-189.
  3. J.-P. Jones, G. K. S. Prakash, G. A. Olah, Isr. J. Chem. 2014, 54, 1451-1466.
  4. K. P. Kuhl, E. R. Cave, D. N. Abram, T. F. Jaramillo, Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7050-7059.
  5. K. P. Kuhl, T. Hatsukade, E. R. Cave, D. N. Abram, J. Kibsgaard, T. F. Jaramillo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14107-14113.
  6. D. Ren, Y. Deng, A. D. Handoko, C. S. Chen, S. Malkhandi, B. S. Yeo, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 2814-2821.
  7. M. Ma, K. Djanashvili, W. A. Smith, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6680-6684.
  8. C. W. Li, M. W. Kanan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 7231-7234.
  9. R. Kas, R. Kortlever, A. Milbrat, M. T. M. Koper, G. Mul, J. Baltrusaitis, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 12194.
  10. Y. Lum, B. Yue, P. Lobaccaro, A. T. Bell, J. W. Ager, J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 14191-14203.
  11. D. Gao, I. Zegkinoglou, N. J. Divins, F. Scholten, I. Sinev, P. Grosse, B. Roldan Cuenya, ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4825-4831.
  12. H. Mistry, A. S. A. S. Varela, C. S. C. S. C. S. Bonifacio, I. Zegkinoglou, I. Sinev, Y.-W. Y.-W. Choi, K. Kisslinger, E. A. E. A. Stach, J. C. J. C. Yang, P. Strasser, et al., Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12123.
  13. S. Lee, D. Kim, J. Lee, Angew. Chemie 2015, 127, 14914-14918.
  14. C. H. Lee, M. W. Kanan, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 465-469.
  15. A. Eilert, F. Cavalca, F. S. Roberts, J. Osterwalder, C. Liu, M. Favaro, E. J. Crumlin, H. Ogasawara, D. Friebel, L. G. M. Pettersson, et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 285-290.
  16. M. Favaro, H. Xiao, T. Cheng, W. A. Goddard, J. Yano, E. J. Crumlin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 114, 201701405.
  17. H. Xiao, W. A. Goddard, T. Cheng, Y. Liu, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 201702405.
  18. I. Platzman, R. Brener, H. Haick, R. Tannenbaum, J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 1101-1108.
  19. L. Xu, Y. Yang, Z.-W. Hu, S.-H. Yu, ACS Nano 2016, 10, 3823- 3834.
  20. S. Matsnnaga, T. Homma, Oxid. Met. 1976, 10, 361-376.
  21. C. Gattinoni, A. Michaelides, Surf. Sci. Rep. 2015, 70, 424-447.
  22. K. Fujita, D. Ando, M. Uchikoshi, K. Mimura, M. Isshiki, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 276, 347-358.
  23. Q. Zhu, L. Zou, G. Zhou, W. A. Saidi, J. C. Yang, Surf. Sci. 2016, 652, 98-113.
  24. F. S. Roberts, K. P. Kuhl, A. Nilsson, Angew. Chemie 2015, 127, 5268-5271.
  25. M. Favaro, H. Xiao, T. Cheng, W. A. Goddard, J. Yano, E. J. Crumlin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114, 6706-6711.
  26. C. W. Li, J. Ciston, M. W. Kanan, Nature 2014, 508, 504-507.
  27. A. Verdaguer-Casadevall, C. W. Li, T. P. Johansson, S. B. Scott, J. T. McKeown, M. Kumar, I. E. L. Stephens, M. W. Kanan, I. Chorkendorff, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9808-9811.
  28. X. Feng, K. Jiang, S. Fan, M. W. Kanan, ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 169-174.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lum, Y., & Ager, J. W.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Ager, Joel W.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-08
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
551-554
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W2767281273
Cited by
410
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 25
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-SC0004993)
  • National Research Foundation Singapore (Singapore Berkeley Initiative for Sustainable Energy)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
electrochemical CO2 reduction, 18O labeling, multi-carbon products, catalyst stability, oxygen determination, catalyst reoxidation, secondary ion mass spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review