Cited by 193Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionStudent Stress and CopingImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Coping with Cyberbullying: Differences Between Victims, Bully‐victims and Children not Involved in Bullying

Völlink, Trijntje, Bolman, Catherine A.W., Dehue, Francine, Jacobs, Niels C.L.·2013·Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigated the relationship between the use of coping strategies to deal with daily stressors in general (n = 325) and the use of coping strategies to deal with cyberbullying in particular (n = 88) among children aged 11 and 12 years. Additionally, it investigated the impact of coping strategies on depression and health in victims of cyberbullying (n = 88). The results showed that victims differed significantly from bully‐victims (i.e. victims that also bully) and from children not involved in cyberbullying, in that they use certain emotion‐focused coping strategies for daily stressors in general more than others. Additionally, this study investigated among victims of cyberbullying the relation between coping strategies in daily life, cyberspecific coping, depressive feelings and health complaints. Coping through emotional expression, avoidance and depressive coping in daily life will lead to more cyberspecific depressive coping when confronted with cyberbullying. This in turn will lead to more depressive feelings and/or health complaints for victims of cyberbullying. These results stress the importance of teaching children how to stand up for themselves and employ effective coping strategies to deal with stress in daily life in general and to deal with cyberbullying in particular. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/casp.2142

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Völlink, T., Bolman, C. A. W., Dehue, F., & Jacobs, N. C. L.
Affiliations
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Corresponding author
Völlink, Trijntje
Venue
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-27
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
7-24
ISSN
  • 1052-9284 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1298
OpenAlex
W1931925835
Cited by
193
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, coping strategies, emotion-focused coping, bully-victims, children, depression, health complaints, daily hassles, emotional expression, avoidance, depressive coping, cyberbullying victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review