Cited by 60Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Dutch Cyberbullying Victims’ experiences, perceptions, attitudes and motivations related to (coping with) Cyberbullying: Focus group interviews

Open access
Jacobs, Niels, Goossens, Linda, Dehue, Francine, Völlink, Trijntje, Lechner, Lilian·2015·Societies

Abstract

Because of the negative effects of cyberbullying; and because of its unique characteristics; interventions to stop cyberbullying are needed. For this purpose, more insightful information is needed about cyberbullying victims’ (i.e., the target group) experiences, perceptions, attitudes and motivations related to (coping with) cyberbullying. Five schools with 66 low-educated Dutch adolescents between 12 and 15 (53% female) participated in 10 focus group interviews. Results show that victims do not perceive all behaviors as cyberbullying and traditional bullying is generally perceived as worse than cyberbullying. Cyberbullies are perceived as sad, cowards and embarrassing themselves. Victims are perceived as easy targets; they wear strange clothes, act in a provocative manner and have a bad appearance. These perceptions often depend on context, the level of anonymity, being in a fight or not, the person sending the message and his/her behavior. Further, victims reacted to cyberbullying by acting nonchalant, by not actually saying anything and seeking help from others (i.e., parents are not often asked for help because they do not want to bother them; fear of restricted Internet privileges). It can be concluded that asking cyberbullying victims about their experiences in an open manner, and allowing them to discuss these experiences, likely results in new and insightful information compared to using self-reports. In this questioning the perception of adolescents is key to see what is perceived as cyberbullying.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/soc5010043

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While there are commonalities between traditional bullying and cyberbullying, there are also factors unique to cyberbullying due to the complexity of the cyber world and the ambiguous nature of some interactions within it.

    “These studies highlight that while there are commonalties between traditional bullying and cyberbullying, there are also a number of factors unique to cyberbullying due to the complexity of the cyber world and the ambiguous nature of some of the interactions which take place within it (Baas, de Jong, & Drossaert, 2013;Betts & Spenser, 2017;Jacobs, Goossens, Dehue, Völlink, & Lechner, 2015;Mishna,”
  • Young people's characterization of cyberbullying was complicated by the all-consuming and complex nature of the cyber world and the ambiguous nature of many interactions within it.

    “However, young people's characterization of the phenomenon was complicated by the all-consuming and complex nature of the cyber world and the ambiguous nature of many interactions that take place within it (Baas et al., 2013;Betts & Spenser, 2017;Jacobs et al., 2015;Mishna et al., 2009;Nocentini et al., 2010;Pelfrey & Weber, 2014).”
  • A number of studies suggested that girls were more likely to be involved in cyberbullying as victims and perpetrators.

    “However, a number of studies suggested that girls were more likely to be involved in cyberbullying as victims and perpetrators (Berne et al., 2014;Jacobs et al., 2015;Smith et al., 2008).”
  • Three conceptually rich studies were purposefully read and open-coded independently by two reviewers to ensure inter-coder reliability and validity in the coding process.

    “Three conceptually rich studies were identified and these were purposefully read and open-coded independently by two reviewers (RD, CS) to ensure inter-coder reliability and validity in the coding process (Jacobs et al., 2015;Mishna et al., 2009;Nocentini et al., 2010).”
  • Young people perceived cyberbullies as insecure and recognized cyberbullying acts as enhancing the self-esteem of the perpetrator.

    “Young people perceived cyberbullies as insecure and recognized cyberbullying acts as enhancing the self-esteem of the perpetrator (Berne et al., 2014;Betts & Spenser, 2017;Jacobs et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, N., Goossens, L., Dehue, F., Völlink, T., & Lechner, L.
Affiliations
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, Niels
Venue
Societies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-01-13
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
43-64
ISSN
2075-4698 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063049967
Cited by
60
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Societies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyberbullying victims, adolescents, victim perceptions, victim attitudes, perceived anonymity, traditional bullying, victim stereotypes, help-seeking, Dutch adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review