Cited by 117Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

The ventral striatopallidothalamic projection: I. The striatopallidal link originating in the striatal parts of the olfactory tubercle

Heimer, L., Zaborszky, L., Zahm, D. S., Alheid, G. F.·1987·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The projections from the striatal part of the olfactory tubercle were examined in rats, both with the aid of experimental silver impregnation methods following superficial laminar heat lesions of the tubercle and by the use of anterograde transport of Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) following injections of the lectin in the dense cell layer of the tubercle. Retrograde transport of fluorescent substances following injections of the tracer in the multiform layer of the tubercle were used to corroborate the results obtained by the anterograde transport and degeneration methods. The main and apparently only significant termination from the striatal cells in the olfactory tubercle is located immediately deep to the dense cell layer in areas that could be identified as part of the ventral pallidum on the basis of either the Nissl method or glutamate decarboxylase immunocytochemistry. Whereas a mediolateral topography is generally maintained by the ventral striatopallidal pathway originating in the dense cell layer, there is a considerable spread of the projection in the rostrocaudal direction. The dense projection field of the olfactory tubercle component of the ventral striatopallidal pathway permeates the ventrolateral part of the ventral pallidum, thereby complementing the termination of the accumbens projection to the more mediodorsal parts of the ventral pallidum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902550409

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heimer, L., Zaborszky, L., Zahm, D. S., & Alheid, G. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-01-22
Volume
255
Issue
4
Pages
571-591
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2014989557
Cited by
117
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 01799, NS-17743)
  • National Center for Research Resources (2-507RR05431-24)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
olfactory tubercle, ventral pallidum, striatal projections, anterograde tracing, retrograde tracing, glutamic acid decarboxylase, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Corpus Striatum, Globus Pallidus, Male, Nerve Degeneration, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Olfactory Bulb, Phytohemagglutinins, Rats, Inbred Strains, Thalamus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review