Cited by 226Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Basal ganglia circuit loops, dopamine and motivation: a review and enquiry

Open access
Ikemoto, Satoshi, Yang, Chen, Tan, Aaron·2015·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Dopamine neurons located in the midbrain play a role in motivation that regulates approach behavior (approach motivation). In addition, activation and inactivation of dopamine neurons regulate mood and induce reward and aversion, respectively. Accumulating evidence suggests that such motivational role of dopamine neurons is not limited to those located in the ventral tegmental area, but also in the substantia nigra. The present paper reviews previous rodent work concerning dopamine's role in approach motivation and the connectivity of dopamine neurons, and proposes two working models: One concerns the relationship between extracellular dopamine concentration and approach motivation. High, moderate and low concentrations of extracellular dopamine induce euphoric, seeking and aversive states, respectively. The other concerns circuit loops involving the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, epithalamus, and midbrain through which dopaminergic activity alters approach motivation. These models should help to generate hypothesis-driven research and provide insights for understanding altered states associated with drugs of abuse and affective disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.018

Cites

255 of 255 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Smith, 1998, Microcircuitry of the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia, Neuroscience, 86, 353

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ikemoto, S., Yang, C., & Tan, A.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Ikemoto, Satoshi
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
290
Pages
17-31
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081845928
Cited by
226
References
255
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (ZIADA000575, ZIADA000439, ZIADA000550)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dopamine, approach motivation, substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, reward, aversion, thalamus, epithalamus, drugs of abuse, mood disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Basal Ganglia, Motivation, Nerve Net, Reward, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review