Cited by 150Multisensory perception and integrationOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesIon Channels and Receptors

Smelling sounds: Olfactory-auditory sensory convergence in the olfactory tubercle

Open access
Wesson, Daniel W., Wilson, Donald A.·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Historical and psychophysical literature has demonstrated a perceptual interplay between olfactory and auditory stimuli-the neural mechanisms of which are not understood. Here, we report novel findings revealing that the early olfactory code is subjected to auditory cross-modal influences. In vivo extracellular recordings from the olfactory tubercle, a trilaminar structure within the basal forebrain, of anesthetized mice revealed that olfactory tubercle single units selectively respond to odors-with 65% of units showing significant odor-evoked activity. Remarkably, 19% of olfactory tubercle single units also showed robust responses to an auditory tone. Furthermore, 29% of single units tested displayed supraadditive or suppressive responses to the simultaneous presentation of odor and tone, suggesting cross-modal modulation. In contrast, olfactory bulb units did not show significant responses to tone presentation nor modulation of odor-evoked activity by tone-suggesting a lack of olfactory-auditory convergence upstream from the olfactory tubercle. Thus, the tubercle presents itself as a source for direct multimodal convergence within an early stage of odor processing and may serve as a seat for psychophysical interactions between smells and sounds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.6003-09.2010

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wesson and Wilson discovered direct connections between the ear and the olfactory tubercule in mice.

    “Wesson and Wilson's [160] surprising discovery of direct connections between the ear and the olfactory tubercule in mice”

    From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [160]

    The Abstract and Discussion report that olfactory-tubercle neurons in anesthetized mice responded to sounds, supporting auditory–olfactory convergence. But the Introduction describes possible routes for auditory information, and the study does not establish a direct anatomical connection between the ear and the olfactory tubercle. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wesson, D. W., & Wilson, D. A.
Affiliations
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-02-24
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
3013-3021
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2017799956
Cited by
150
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC-003906, R01DC003906)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
olfactory tubercle, cross-modal interaction, odor-evoked activity, single-unit responses, olfactory bulb, multimodal sensory integration, olfactory processing, mice
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Action Potentials, Animals, Association, Auditory Pathways, Auditory Perception, Auditory Threshold, Electrophysiology, Hearing, Male, Odorants, Olfactory Pathways, Psychophysics, Sensory Receptor Cells, Smell, Structure-Activity Relationship, Mice, Olfactory Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review