Cited by 357Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Worry and rumination: Differential associations with anxious and depressive symptoms and coping behavior

Hong, Ryan Y.·2007·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Worry and rumination are closely allied cognitive processes that impact on the experience of anxious and depressive symptoms. Using a prospective design, this study examined overlapping and distinct features of worry and rumination in relation to symptoms and coping behavior in a nonclinical sample of Singaporean college students. Worry and rumination were highly correlated, but they retained distinct components that predicted anxious and depressive symptoms differentially within and across time. Specifically, worry was uniquely associated with anxious and depressive symptoms whereas rumination was uniquely related to depression. In comparison to rumination, worry emerged as the dominant cognitive vulnerability factor that predicted increments in symptoms over time. With regards to coping behavior, low perceived coping effectiveness partially mediated the relation between worry and increases in anxiety and depression. Conversely, rumination uniquely predicted higher disengagement from problems, which resulted in further exacerbation of depressive mood. These results demonstrated not only the distinct features of worry and rumination on coping behavior, but also the different coping pathways by which they differentially impact on subsequent symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.006

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, R. Y.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Hong, Ryan Y.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
277-290
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082266447
Cited by
357
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Guangdong Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
worry, rumination, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, coping styles, cognitive vulnerability, university students, non-clinical sample, Singaporean students
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Association, Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review