Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Model‐Informed Precision Dosing for Antibiotics

Open access
Wicha, Sebastian G., Märtson, Anne‐Grete, Nielsen, Elisabet I., Koch, Birgit C.P., Friberg, Lena E., Alffenaar, Jan‐Willem, Minichmayr, Iris K., the International Society of Anti‐Infective Pharmacology (ISAP), the PK/PD study group of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases (EPASG)·2021·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and model‐informed precision dosing (MIPD) have evolved as important tools to inform rational dosing of antibiotics in individual patients with infections. In particular, critically ill patients display altered, highly variable pharmacokinetics and often suffer from infections caused by less susceptible bacteria. Consequently, TDM has been used to individualize dosing in this patient group for many years. More recently, there has been increasing research on the use of MIPD software to streamline the TDM process, which can increase the flexibility and precision of dose individualization but also requires adequate model validation and re‐evaluation of existing workflows. In parallel, new minimally invasive and noninvasive technologies such as microneedle‐based sensors are being developed, which—together with MIPD software—have the potential to revolutionize how patients are dosed with antibiotics. Nonetheless, carefully designed clinical trials to evaluate the benefit of TDM and MIPD approaches are still sparse, but are critically needed to justify the implementation of TDM and MIPD in clinical practice. The present review summarizes the clinical pharmacology of antibiotics, conventional TDM and MIPD approaches, and evidence of the value of TDM/MIPD for aminoglycosides, beta‐lactams, glycopeptides, and linezolid, for which precision dosing approaches have been recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpt.2202

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Wicha, S. G., Märtson, A., Nielsen, E. I., Koch, B. C. P., Friberg, L. E., Alffenaar, J., Minichmayr, I. K., & the International Society of Anti‐Infective Pharmacology (ISAP), T. P. S. G. O. T. E. S. O. C. M.
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-16
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
928-941
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W3126910175
Cited by
322
References
82
FWCI
22.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.