Cited by 121Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

EFFECT OF TRANSDIAGNOSTIC CBT FOR ANXIETY DISORDERS ON COMORBID DIAGNOSES: Research Article: Transdiagnostic CBT and Comorbidity

Open access
Norton, Peter J., Barrera, Terri L., Mathew, Amanda R., Chamberlain, Lance D., Szafranski, Derek D., Reddy, Radhika, Smith, Angela H.·2013·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study examines the effectiveness of a 12-week transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral group in reducing comorbid diagnoses. METHOD: Data from 79 treatment completers (60.8% women; M age = 32.57 years) during three previous trials of transdiagnostic cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) were examined to compare treatment effects between those with and without comorbid diagnoses. Additionally, rates of remission of comorbid diagnoses were compared to published diagnosis-specific CBT trials. RESULTS: Results indicate that a majority of clients (64.6%) had at least one comorbid disorder and that those with comorbid diagnoses had higher primary diagnosis severity scores than did those without comorbid diagnoses. The presence of a comorbid diagnosis at pretreatment was not associated with differential improvement in primary diagnosis severity following treatment. Two-thirds of completers with comorbid diagnoses at pretreatment (66.7%) no longer met criteria for a clinically severe comorbid diagnosis at posttreatment, a rate higher than that associated with most trials of diagnosis-specific CBT for anxiety disorders used as benchmarks. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral group treatment for anxiety may be associated with greater decreases in comorbidity than traditional diagnosis-specific CBT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22018

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improvements in one dimension of psychological experiences are associated with improvements in further dimensions of psychological experiences.

    “the concept of the transdiagnostic approach (97, 100–109) reflects the observation that improvements in one dimension of psychological experiences are associated with improvements in further dimensions of psychological experiences.”

    From Sleep disturbances and psychological well-being among military medical doctors of the Swiss Armed Forces: study protocol, rationale and development of a cross-sectional and longitudinal interventional study (2024) · cites this paper as [105]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) reports improvement in primary anxiety diagnoses alongside decreases in comorbid diagnoses after transdiagnostic CBT. That supports the claim’s general direction, but the paper does not establish that improvement in one dimension is associated with improvement in another, or extend the finding to psychological experiences broadly. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Spielberger CD. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norton, P. J., Barrera, T. L., Mathew, A. R., Chamberlain, L. D., Szafranski, D. D., Reddy, R., & Smith, A. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Department of Psychology; University of Houston; Houston Texas
Corresponding author
Norton, Peter J.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2012-12-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
168-173
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1791004779
Cited by
121
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIMH Mentored Research Scientist Development Award (1K01MH073920)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, comorbidities, group therapy, remission, treatment effectiveness, comorbidity reduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review