Cited by 158Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Assessing the Efficacy of Mobile Health Apps Using the Basic Principles of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Systematic Review

Open access
Rathbone, Amy Leigh, Clarry, Laura, Prescott, Julie·2017·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in its basic principle has developed itself as a stand-alone, substantial method of therapy. With effective application in therapy for a range of mental health issues, the spread of CBT methods to Web-based therapy sources is evident. The development of mobile phone apps using CBT principles is increasing within the research area. Despite the move to Web-based methods of therapy, it is argued that these methods lack the same efficacy of face-to-face therapy sessions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess extent research findings with regard to the effectiveness of CBT-related mobile health (mHealth) apps. By assessing only studies employing a randomized controlled trial design, the review aimed to determine app efficacy within the highly regarded method of investigation. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases. Search results were filtered, and results were subject to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria because of the nature of the review. Where possible, analysis of effect size was calculated and results reported. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies investigating the effectiveness of mHealth CBT-related apps across a range of mental health issues were reviewed. Three studies used the app against a control group, and 5 studies used the app intervention against another form of treatment or intervention. A range of effect sizes were seen across all included studies (d=-0.13 to 1.83; 0.03-1.44), with the largest effects often being seen when comparing the data from pre- to posttest for the app engaged group. CONCLUSIONS: The studies reviewed support the use of mHealth apps containing CBT principles for a range of mental health issues. However, the effectiveness over longer time periods should be assessed. Researchers and professionals should seek to collaborate effectively when creating new apps to enhance their effectiveness as a treatment for the general public.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.8598

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have shown that CBT smartphone apps have therapeutic potential.

    “Studies have shown that CBT smartphone apps have therapeutic potential [31]”
  • A systematic review of eight randomized controlled trials (n = 1794) investigating psychological outcomes from the use of mHealth apps to manage depression, chronic pain acceptance, insomnia severity, stress or PTSD symptoms showed variations in effect sizes (d = −0.13 to 1.83; 0.03-1.44) with higher engagement associated with improved outcomes.

    “A systematic review of eight randomized controlled trials (n = 1794) investigating psychological outcomes from the use of mHealth apps to manage depression, chronic pain acceptance, insomnia severity, stress or PTSD symptoms showed variations in effect sizes (d = −0.13 to 1.83; 0.03–1.44) with higher engagement associated with improved outcomes.”

    From What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients? (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Many mental health applications for emotion regulation training were developed, mainly focused on cognitive change, mindfulness, or cognitive behavioral therapy principles.

    “Many mHealth applications for ER training were developed, mainly focused on cognitive change (Beck, 2017), mindfulness (Plaza et al., 2013), or more generally, on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) principles (Rathbone et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Hollon SD Beck AT Cognitive and cognitive-behavioral therapies Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. 4th edition 1994 Oxford, England John Wiley 428 66
  2. [6]Beck AT Freeman A Davis DD Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders. 3rd edition 2015 New York Guilford Press
  3. [7]Dobson KS Handbook of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies. 3rd edition 2009 New York Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rathbone, A. L., Clarry, L., & Prescott, J.
Affiliations
University of Greater Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Prescott, Julie
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2017-11-28
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
e399
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768506072
Cited by
158
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UBIR (University of Greater Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UBIR (University of Greater Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Bolton
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mobile health apps, cognitive behavioral therapy, digital mental health interventions, app efficacy, mental illness, effect size, online therapy
MeSH terms
Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review