Cited by 95Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Cognitive neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Current status and working hypotheses

Open access
Vaidya, Chandan J., Stollstorff, Melanie·2008·Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience studies of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) suggest multiple loci of pathology with respect to both cognitive domains and neural circuitry. Cognitive deficits extend beyond executive functioning to include spatial, temporal, and lower‐level “nonexecutive” functions. Atypical functional anatomy extends beyond frontostriatal circuits to include posterior cortices, limbic regions, and the cerebellum. Pathophysiology includes dopaminergic as well as noradrenergic neurotransmitter systems. We review the major insights gained from functional brain imaging studies in ADHD and discuss working hypotheses regarding their neurochemical underpinnings. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2008;14:261–267.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ddrr.40

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing studies also observed the involvement of the fronto-striatal circuit in working memory impairment and delay aversion in ADHD.

    “Moreover, existing studies also observed the involvement of the fronto-striatal circuit in working memory impairment and delay aversion in ADHD (Castellanos et al., 2006; Vaidya and Stollstorff, 2008; Darki and Klingberg, 2015; Bollmann et al., 2017).”

    From A Review of Heterogeneity in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (2019) · cites this paper as Vaidya and Stollstorff, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaidya, C. J., & Stollstorff, M.
Affiliations
  • Children's National (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Vaidya, Chandan J.
Venue
Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
261-267
ISSN
  • 1940-5510 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-5529
OpenAlex
W2112435834
Cited by
95
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH65395, R01MH065395)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, executive function, frontostriatal circuits, posterior cortex, limbic system, cerebellum, dopamine signaling, noradrenergic neurotransmission, functional neuroimaging, ADHD pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition Disorders, Corpus Striatum, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Neuropsychological Tests, Neurosciences, Parietal Lobe, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review