Cited by 337Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Placebo Effect

Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behaviour. A prospective study

Asghari, Ali, Nicholas, Michael K.·2001·Pain

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between pain self-efficacy beliefs and a range of pain behaviours, as measured by the pain behaviour questionnaire (PBQ), using a prospective design. A heterogeneous sample of 145 chronic pain patients completed sets of questionnaires on four occasions over a nine-month period. Multiple hierarchical regression analyses revealed that the subjects' confidence in their ability to perform a range of tasks despite pain (assessed at baseline), was predictive of total pain behaviour and avoidance behaviour over the nine-month study period. This finding was particularly significant because the analyses controlled for the possible effects of pain severity (at each measurement occasion), pain chronicity, age, gender, physical disability, depression, neuroticism and catastrophising. These findings suggest that pain self-efficacy beliefs are an important determinant of pain behaviours and disability associated with pain, over and above the effects of pain, distress and personality variables. In particular, higher pain self-efficacy beliefs are predictive of reduced avoidance behaviours over an extended period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00344-x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asghari, A., & Nicholas, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Shahed University (IR)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Nicholas, Michael K.
Venue
Pain
Published
2001-10
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
85-100
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007224798
Cited by
337
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
pain self-efficacy, pain behavior, chronic pain, disability, pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, pain chronicity, depression, neuroticism
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review