Cited by 70Neurological disorders and treatmentsTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

A new translational target for deep brain stimulation to treat depression

Open access
Kiening, Karl, Sartorius, Alexander·2013·EMBO Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Depression is a common, severe psychiatric illness with an enormous individual and societal burden and limited therapeutic options. Unfortunately, between about 10 and 30% of depressed patients taking antidepressants and receiving psychotherapy are partially or totally resistant to these treatments, and even with electroconvulsive therapy, a significant number remain refractory between about 10 and 30% of depressed patients taking antidepressants and receiving psychotherapy are partially or totally resistant to these treatments, and even with electroconvulsive therapy, a significant number remain refractory. Thus, there is an urgent need for more effective treatments, especially for the most severely affected fraction of patients. > …between about 10 and 30% of depressed patients taking antidepressants and receiving psychotherapy are partially or totally resistant to these treatments, and even with electroconvulsive therapy, a significant number remain refractory. For the treatment of neurological symptoms, such as essential tremor, dystonia and Parkinson Disease, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a routine treatment. Given this success, the last decade has seen its application in small case series and individual cases to treat depression. Most of these studies have described successful treatment rates of around 30–50% in patients who had previously been characterised as treatment resistant. Such an approach in treatment resistant depression (TRD) of course depends on the selection of suitable targets in the complex neural circuits mediating this brain disease. To be able to translate preclinical findings into human research, a valid animal model and a tool for translation are required. In our search for an appropriate target, we have used the congenital Learned Helpless (cLH) model, which uniquely models TRD. Inter alia , our established genetic …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/emmm.201302947

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Keining et al 2013 open-label study of two patients with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 100% remission rate, measured by HDRS.

    “| | Keining et al | 2013 Open label | N = 2 | N/A | 100.0% | 100.0% | HDRS |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Across the four pooled lateral habenula deep brain stimulation studies totaling 11 patients, the response rate was 85.7%.

    “Total* | | | N = 11 | | 85.7% | 53.6% | |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Across the four pooled lateral habenula deep brain stimulation studies totaling 11 patients, the remission rate was 53.6%.

    “Total* | | | N = 11 | | 85.7% | 53.6% | |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [46]

  • In the Keining et al 2013 open-label study of two patients with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 100% response rate, measured by HDRS.

    “| | Keining et al | 2013 Open label | N = 2 | N/A | 100.0% | 100.0% | HDRS |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [46]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiening, K., & Sartorius, A.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Kiening, Karl
Venue
EMBO Molecular Medicine
Published
2013-07-04
Volume
5
Issue
8
Pages
1151-1153
ISSN
  • 1757-4676 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-4684
OpenAlex
W2112694709
Cited by
70
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EMBO Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EW1110)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, depression, animal models of depression, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Depressive Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Helplessness, Learned, Humans, Phenotype, Treatment Outcome, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Habenula, Deep Brain Stimulation, Rats, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review