Cited by 720Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsInflammatory Bowel Disease

High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Open access
Lindor, Keith D., Kowdley, Kris V., Luketic, Velimir A. C., Harrison, Edwyn M., McCashland, Timothy, Befeler, Alex S., Harnois, Denise, Jorgensen, Roberta +12 more·2009·Hepatology

Abstract

Previous controlled trials are inconclusive regarding the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for treating primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). One hundred fifty adult patients with PSC were enrolled in a long-term, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of high-dose UDCA (28-30 mg/kg/day) versus placebo. Liver biopsy and cholangiography were performed before randomization and after 5 years. The primary outcome measures were development of cirrhosis, varices, cholangiocarcinoma, liver transplantation, or death. The study was terminated after 6 years due to futility. At enrollment, the UDCA (n = 76) and placebo (n = 74) groups were similar with respect to sex, age, duration of disease, serum aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase levels, liver histology, and Mayo risk score. During therapy, aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase levels decreased more in the UDCA group than the placebo group ( P < 0.01), but improvements in liver tests were not associated with decreased endpoints. By the end of the study, 30 patients in the UDCA group (39%) versus 19 patients in the placebo group (26%) had reached one of the pre-established clinical endpoints. After adjustment for baseline stratification characteristics, the risk of a primary endpoint was 2.3 times greater for patients on UDCA than for those on placebo ( P < 0.01) and 2.1 times greater for death, transplantation, or minimal listing criteria ( P = 0.038). Serious adverse events were more common in the UDCA group than the placebo group (63% versus 37% [ P < 0.01]). Conclusion: Long-term, high-dose UDCA therapy is associated with improvement in serum liver tests in PSC but does not improve survival and was associated with higher rates of serious adverse events. (Hepatology 2009.)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.23082

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of smaller pilot studies and larger RCTs demonstrated improvement of serum liver tests, except for 2 of them, but these studies were all underpowered for the identification of hard clinical outcome parameters such as death or liver transplantation.

    “A number of smaller pilot studies and larger RCTs 13,80,[147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156] demonstrated improvement of serum liver tests (except for 2 of them 150,155 ), but these studies were all underpowered for the identification of”

    From EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on sclerosing cholangitis (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

  • Except for demonstrating the negative impact of high-dose UDCA (28-30 mg/kg), no systematic studies have evaluated the impact of treatment with medium or moderate dose UDCA on HVPG or the risk of portal hypertension-related complications in PSC.

    “However, except for demonstrating the negative impact of high-dose UDCA (28-30 mg/kg), 80 no systematic studies have evaluated the impact of treatment with medium/moderate dose UDCA on HVPG or the risk of portal hypertension-related complications in PSC.”

    From EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on sclerosing cholangitis (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

  • Ursodeoxycholic acid is less effective in primary sclerosing cholangitis than in primary biliary cholangitis.

    “while UDCA has proven beneficial effects in about 60% of PBC patients, it is less effective in PSC.(69)(70)(71)”

    From The ascending pathophysiology of cholestatic liver disease (2017) · cites this paper as [71]

  • In a controlled trial, primary sclerosing cholangitis patients given high-dose UDCA had more portal hypertension-related complications than those given placebo.

    “In a controlled trial PSC patients received high-dose UDCA or placebo.Patients allocated to the UDCA group developed more complications related to portal hypertension than placebo-treated patients.(71)”

    From The ascending pathophysiology of cholestatic liver disease (2017) · cites this paper as [71]

  • Ursodeoxycholic acid produces beneficial effects in roughly 60% of patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

    “while UDCA has proven beneficial effects in about 60% of PBC patients, it is less effective in PSC.(69)(70)(71)”

    From The ascending pathophysiology of cholestatic liver disease (2017) · cites this paper as [71]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindor, K. D., Kowdley, K. V., Luketic, V. A. C., Harrison, E. M., McCashland, T., Befeler, A. S., Harnois, D., Jorgensen, R., Petz, J., Keach, J., Mooney, J., Sargeant, C., Braaten, J., Bernard, T., King, D., Miceli, E., Schmoll, J., Hoskin, T., Thapa, P., & Enders, F.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Virginia Mason Medical Center (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Lindor, Keith D.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2009-09
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
808-814
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133403920
Cited by
720
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 58
FWCI
36.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • U.S. Public Health Service (56924)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK002957, R01DK056924)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000065)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
ursodeoxycholic acid, primary sclerosing cholangitis, liver cirrhosis, cholangiocarcinoma, liver transplantation, varices, liver enzymes, adverse events, treatment efficacy, futility
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Bilirubin, Cholagogues and Choleretics, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Liver Function Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, Cholangitis, Sclerosing, Liver Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review