Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 564

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Open access
Musso, Giovanni, Gambino, Roberto, Cassader, Maurizio, Pagano, Gianfranco·2010·Hepatology

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a histological spectrum ranging from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NAFLD carries a higher risk of cardio-metabolic and liver-related complications, the latter being confined to NASH and demanding specific treatment. We assessed the efficacy of proposed treatments for NAFLD/NASH by reviewing reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on online databases and national and international meeting abstracts through January 2010. Primary outcome measure was histological improvement; secondary outcome was biochemical improvement; improvement in radiological steatosis was also evaluated. Two reviewers extracted articles using predefined quality indicators, independently and in duplicate. Main outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were pooled using random-effects or fixed-effects models. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. Forty-nine RCTs (30 in NASH) were included: 23 RCTs (22 in NASH, 1 in NAFLD) had post-treatment histology. Most RCTs were small and did not exceed 1-year duration. Weight loss, thiazolidinediones (especially pioglitazone), and antioxidants were most extensively evaluated. Weight loss was safe and dose-dependently improved histological disease activity in NASH, but more than 50% of patients failed to achieve target weight loss. Thiazolidinediones improved steatosis and inflammation but yielded significant weight gain. RCTs with antioxidants yielded conflicting results and were heterogeneous with respect to type and dose of drug, duration, implementation of lifestyle intervention. Among the other agents, pentoxifylline, telmisartan and L-carnitine improved liver histology in at least 1 RCT in NASH; polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) ameliorated biochemical and radiological markers of NAFLD. Other approaches yielded negative results. Conclusion: Well-designed RCTs of adequate size and duration, with histological endpoints, are needed to assess long-term safety and efficacy of proposed treatments on patient-oriented clinical outcomes. Hepatology 2010

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.23623

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Musso, G., Gambino, R., Cassader, M., & Pagano, G.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2010-07
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
79-104
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025680761
Cited by
564
References
9
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.