Cited by 1,585Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsUltrasound Imaging and Elastography

Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: A meta-analysis

Open access
Hernaez, Ruben, Lazo, Mariana, Bonekamp, Susanne, Kamel, Ihab, Brancati, Frederick L., Guallar, Eliseo, Clark, Jeanne M.·2011·Hepatology

Abstract

Ultrasonography is a widely accessible imaging technique for the detection of fatty liver, but the reported accuracy and reliability have been inconsistent across studies. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver. We used MEDLINE and Embase from October 1967 to March 2010. Studies that provided cross-tabulations of ultrasonography versus histology or standard imaging techniques, or that provided reliability data for ultrasonography, were included. Study variables were independently abstracted by three reviewers and double checked by one reviewer. Forty-nine (4720 participants) studies were included for the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of ultrasound for the detection of moderate-severe fatty liver, compared to histology (gold standard), were 84.8% (95% confidence interval: 79.5-88.9), 93.6% (87.2-97.0), 13.3 (6.4-27.6), and 0.16 (0.12-0.22), respectively. The area under the summary receiving operating characteristics curve was 0.93 (0.91-0.95). Reliability of ultrasound for the detection of fatty liver showed kappa statistics ranging from 0.54 to 0.92 for intrarater reliability and from 0.44 to 1.00 for interrater reliability. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound was similar to that of other imaging techniques (i.e., computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). Statistical heterogeneity was present even after stratification for multiple clinically relevant characteristics. Conclusion: Ultrasonography allows for reliable and accurate detection of moderate-severe fatty liver, compared to histology. Because of its low cost, safety, and accessibility, ultrasound is likely the imaging technique of choice for screening for fatty liver in clinical and population settings. (HEPATOLOGY 2011; 54:1082–1090)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.24452

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most recently published articles that have assessed inter-rater reliability have used Cohen's Kappa exclusively [19-26].

    “Most recently published articles that have assessed inter-rater reliability have used Cohen’s Kappa exclusively [19-26]”

    From A comparison of cohen's Kappa and gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: A study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results section, under “Systematic Review of the Reliability of Ultrasonography” (page unavailable), reports that 17 of 22 ultrasound-reliability studies used kappa statistics, including 14 reporting interrater kappa values. This supports kappa being common, but the passage does not identify the statistic specifically as Cohen’s kappa, establish that those studies used it exclusively, or limit the finding to recently published articles. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Few researchers have used AC1 as a statistical tool, or are even aware of it, especially in the medical field.

    “few researchers have used AC1 as a statistical tool, or are even aware of it, especially in the medical field.”

    From A comparison of cohen's Kappa and gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: A study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results section on ultrasonography reliability reports kappa statistics and other agreement measures, but does not discuss AC1. A search of our full-text copy for AC1 and for its use or awareness among medical researchers found no passage addressing the claim; no page number was available in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Cusumano S De Mori E Buschini M Clinical statistics on the agreement of echographic and bioptic findings in diffuse liver diseases. Minerva Med 1986 77 889 892 3523300

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernaez, R., Lazo, M., Bonekamp, S., Kamel, I., Brancati, F. L., Guallar, E., & Clark, J. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2011-09-02
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
1082-1090
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164252555
Cited by
1,585
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 114 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 170 · 2021: 188 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 22
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • National Institutes of Health (5p60dk079637-02)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P60 DK-079637, K24DK062222, R01DK083393)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Keywords
hepatic steatosis, ultrasonography, diagnostic accuracy, reliability statistics, sensitivity and specificity, histology comparison, non-invasive diagnosis, liver imaging
MeSH terms
Fatty Liver, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review