The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo
Abstract
The use of polycaprolactone (PCL) as a biomaterial, especially in the fields of drug delivery and tissue engineering, has enjoyed significant growth. Understanding how such a device or scaffold eventually degrades in vivo is paramount as the defect site regenerates and remodels. Degradation studies of three‐dimensional PCL and PCL‐based composite scaffolds were conducted invitro (in phosphate buffered saline) and in vivo (rabbit model). Results up to 6 months are reported. All samples recorded virtually no molecular weight changes after 6 months, with a maximum mass loss of only about 7% from the PCL‐composite scaffolds degraded in vivo, and a minimum of 1% from PCL scaffolds. Overall, crystallinity increased slightly because of the effects of polymer recrystallization. This was also a contributory factor for the observed stiffness increment in some of the samples, while only the PCL‐composite scaffold registered a decrease. Histological examination of the in vivo samples revealed good biocompatibility, with no adverse host tissue reactions up to 6 months. Preliminary results of medical‐grade PCL scaffolds, which were implanted for 2 years in a critical‐sized rabbit calvarial defect site, are also reported here and support our scaffold design goal for gradual and late molecular weight decreases combined with excellent long‐term biocompatibility and bone regeneration. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage
Hutmacher, D. W. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6 · Cited by 4,994
Self-citationPorous scaffold design for tissue engineering
Hollister, S. J. (2005) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1421 · Cited by 3,969
Third-Generation Biomedical Materials
Hench, L. L., & Polak, J. M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067404 · Cited by 2,789
Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications
Zein, I., Hutmacher, D. W., Tan, K. C., & Teoh, S. H. (2002) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00232-0 · Cited by 1,874
Self-citationMechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion
Göpferich, A. (1996) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(96)85755-3 · Cited by 1,781
The in vivo degradation, absorption and excretion of PCL-based implant
Sun, H., Mei, L., Song, C., Cui, X., & Wang, P. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.019 · Cited by 976
Hydrolytic degradation of devices based on poly(DL-lactic acid) size-dependence
Grizzi, I., Garreau, H., Li, S., & Vert, M. (1995) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(95)93258-f · Cited by 895
Late degradation tissue response to poly(?-lactide) bone plates and screws
Bergsma, J. (1995) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(95)91092-d · Cited by 799
Aliphatic polyesters. I. The degradation of poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) in vivo
Pitt, C. G., Chasalow, F. I., Hibionada, Y. M., Klimas, D. M., & Schindler, A. (1981) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.1981.070261124 · Cited by 712
Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers
(1998) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780367802219 · Cited by 702
Cited by
The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century
Woodruff, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2010) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 · Cited by 4,033
Self-citationBone tissue engineering using 3D printing
Bose, S., Vahabzadeh, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2013) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 · Cited by 1,866
A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
Reddy, M. S. B., Ponnamma, D., Choudhary, R., & Sadasivuni, K. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13071105 · Cited by 1,104
Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions — A 21st Century Perspective
Henkel, J., Woodruff, M. A., Epari, D. R., Steck, R., Glatt, V., Dickinson, I. C., Choong, P. F. M., Schuetz, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Bone Research · doi:10.4248/br201303002 · Cited by 907
Self-citationDegradation mechanisms of polycaprolactone in the context of chemistry, geometry and environment
Bartnikowski, M., Dargaville, T. R., Ivanovski, S., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2019) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.05.004 · Cited by 769
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lam, C. X. F., Hutmacher, D. W., Schantz, J., Woodruff, M. A., & Teoh, S. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-21
- Volume
- 90A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 906-919
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2120980993
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.32052
- The paper
- Lam, C. X. F., Hutmacher, D. W., Schantz, J., Woodruff, M. A., & Teoh, S. H. (2009). Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.