Cited by 21Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCrime Patterns and Interventions

THE ROLE OF RELATIONAL, RECREATIONAL, AND TUTORING ACTIVITIES IN THE PERCEPTIONS OF RECEIVED SUPPORT AND QUALITY OF MENTORING RELATIONSHIP DURING A COMMUNITY-BASED MENTORING RELATIONSHIP: Activities and Mentoring Relationship Quality

Larose, Simon, Savoie, Julien, DeWit, David J., Lipman, Ellen L., DuBois, David L.·2015·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Previous research has shown that activities between volunteer mentors and youth mentees are associated with relationship quality. Using data from a longitudinal investigation of Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) community mentoring relationships across Canada, the current study investigated whether different types of activities (relational and skill, recreational, and tutoring) moderate the association between mentees’ perceptions of received support and subsequent relationship quality. The results showed that, irrespective of activity type, activity frequency was positively associated with perceptions of received support and relationship quality. More importantly, higher frequency of recreational activities strengthened the positive association between perceptions of received support and relationship quality, whereas higher frequency of tutoring activities weakened this association. The implications for the provision of relational and skill, recreational, and tutoring activities are discussed in relation to BBBS programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.21700

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A higher frequency of tutoring activities decreased the positive association between mentees' perceptions of received support and relationship quality.

    “A higher frequency of recreational activities reinforced the positive association between mentees’ perceptions of received support and relationship quality, whereas a higher frequency of tutoring activities decreased this association [72].”
  • A higher frequency of recreational activities reinforced the positive association between mentees' perceptions of received support and relationship quality.

    “A higher frequency of recreational activities reinforced the positive association between mentees’ perceptions of received support and relationship quality, whereas a higher frequency of tutoring activities decreased this association [72].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larose, S., Savoie, J., DeWit, D. J., Lipman, E. L., & DuBois, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Larose, Simon
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-11
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
527-544
ISSN
0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1943272854
Cited by
21
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
mentoring relationships, community mentoring, Big Brothers Big Sisters, perceived support, relationship quality, recreational activities, tutoring, relational activities, skill development, activity frequency, volunteer mentors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review