Cited by 31Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCounseling Practices and Supervision

An ecological perspective of mentor satisfaction with their youth mentoring relationships

Suffrin, Rachael L., Todd, Nathan R., Sánchez, Bernadette·2016·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Research shows the benefits of mentoring in promoting positive youth development. Yet less is known about mentors and what predicts mentor satisfaction. Such knowledge is vital to understanding how to recruit and retain adult mentors for youth. Thus, in the current study, we examine mentors as embedded in a social ecology of relationships, such as relationships with their mentee, mentee's family, and mentoring organization they volunteer with. We use data from 247 mentors to test how each of these relationships (mentor with the mentee, mentee's family, and mentoring organization) independently and interactively predict mentor satisfaction. Findings indicate that all relationships are unique predictors of mentor satisfaction, and that relationships with the mentee's family and mentors’ mentoring organization interact in predicting mentor satisfaction. Overall, considering multiple relationships shows how various dimensions of the social ecology uniquely and interactively predict mentor satisfaction. Limitations and implications for mentoring practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.21785

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mentor satisfaction with the mentee's family regarding the emotional tone of the relationship, communication, cooperation, and appreciation predicted mentors' satisfaction with the mentoring relationship, even after controlling for organizational support, mentors' cultural competence, and other personal characteristics in a long-term American program.

    “Mentor satisfaction with the mentee’s family regarding the emotional tone of the relationship, communication, cooperation, and appreciation predicted mentors’ satisfaction with the mentoring relationship, even after controlling for organizational support, mentors’ cultural competence, and other personal characteristics in a long-term American program [181].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suffrin, R. L., Todd, N. R., & Sánchez, B.
Affiliations
  • DePaul University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Suffrin, Rachael L.
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-17
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
553-568
ISSN
  • 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6629
OpenAlex
W2423663901
Cited by
31
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
youth mentoring, mentor satisfaction, social ecology, mentoring relationships, family relationships, volunteer retention, positive youth development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review